Closed Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 35 of 35
  1. #31
    All-Pro FBomb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    27,957

    Re: Sometimes we lose sight of what's really important

    [quote user="daynemustgo"][quote user="FBomb"][quote user="daynemustgo"][quote user="FBomb"][quote user="daynemustgo"][quote user="jints10"]


    [quote user="RoanokeFan"]You have have to copy to your web browser. It's about real heroes who secure our freedom every day.


    http://s259.photobucket.com/albums/h...t=Untitled.flv
    [/quote]




    Its a sad world we live in , but we gotta keep it going over there so they don't bring it over here, again!




    [/quote]




    Such a simple and indisputable fact and yet it completely mystifies those on the left. They would prefer leaving it up tothe criminal justice system because that approach was oh so successful under Bubba.




    We owe everything to those folks over there.fficeffice" />>>







    [/quote]







    Fine, but the problem is "over there" should be Afganistan. Had we focused all of our attention there, this entire thing may have been over now........with Saddam still vertiually no threat to us.




    It s bogus war, and my support for the troops is about getting them out of harms way. Sadly, nothing will change no matter who gets into office. The entire system is 'on the take.' So you Liberals will be in for a shock if you thing "change" is coming. It isn't.




    [/quote]




    "In a conversation recently, I mentioned as an aside what a great president George Bush has been and my friend was surprised. I was surprised that he was surprised.




    I generally don'ttalk about the manifestly obvious, but, yes, the man responsible for keeping Americans safe from another terrorist attack on American soil for nearly seven years now will go down in history as one of America's greatest presidents.




    Produce one person who believed, on Sept. 12, 2001, that there would not be another attack for seven years, and I'll consider downgrading Bush from "Great" to "Really Good."




    Merely taking out Saddam Hussein and his winsome sons Uday and Qusay (Hussein family slogan: "We're the Rape Room People!") constitutes a greater humanitarian accomplishment than anything Bill Clinton ever did -- and I'm including remembering Monica's name on the sixth sexual encounter.




    But unlike liberals, who are so anxious to send American troops to Rwanda or Darfur, Republicans oppose deploying U.S. troops for purely humanitarian purposes. We invaded Iraq to protect America.




    It is unquestionable that Bush has made this country safe by keeping Islamic lunatics pinned down fighting our troops in Iraq. In the past few years, our brave troops have killed more than 20,000 al-Qaida and other Islamic militants in Iraq alone. That's 20,000 terrorists who will never board a plane headed for JFK -- or a landmark building, for that matter.




    We are, in fact, fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them at, say, the corner of 72nd and Columbus in Manhattan -- the mere mention of which never fails to enrage liberals, which is why you should say it as often as possible.




    The Iraq war has been a stunning success. The Iraqi army is "standing up" (as they say), fat Muqtada al-Sadr --the Dr. Phil of Islamofascist radicalism -- has waddled off in retreat to Iran, and Sadr City and Basra are no longer war zones. Our servicemen must be baffled by the constant nay-saying coming from their own country.




    The Iraqis have a democracy -- a miracle on the order of flush toilets in that godforsaken region of the world. Despite its newness, Iraq's democracy appears to be no more dysfunctional than one that would condemn a man who has kept the nation safe for seven years while deifying a man who has accomplished absolutely nothing in his entire life except to give speeches about "change."




    (Guess what Bill Clinton's campaign theme was in 1992? You are wrong if you guessed: "bringing dignity back to the White House." It was "change." In January 1992, James Carville told Steve Daley of The Chicago Tribune that it had gotten to the point that the press was complaining about Clinton's "constant talk of change.")




    Monthly casualties in Iraq now come in slightly lower than a weekend with Anna Nicole Smith. According to a CNN report last week, for the entire month of May, there were only 19 troop deaths in Iraq. (Last year, five people on average were shot every day in Chicago.) With Iraqi deaths at an all-time low, Iraq is safer than Detroit -- although the Middle Eastern food is still better in Detroit.




    Al-Qaida is virtually destroyed, surprising even the CIA. Two weeks ago, The Washington Post reported: "Less than a year after his agency warned of new threats from a resurgent al-Qaida, CIA Director Michael V. Hayden now portrays the terrorist movement as essentially defeated in Iraq and Saudi Arabia and on the defensive throughout much of the rest of the world, including in its presumed haven along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border."




    It's almost as if there's been some sort of "surge" going on, as strange as that sounds.




    Just this week, The New York Times reported that al-Qaida and other terrorist groups in Southeast Asia have all but disappeared, starved of money and support. The U.S. and Australia have been working closely with the Philippines, Malaysia and Indonesia, sending them counterterrorism equipment and personnel.




    But no one notices when 9/11 doesn't happen. Indeed, if we had somehow stopped the 9/11 attack, we'd all be watching Mohammed Atta being interviewed on MSNBC, explaining his lawsuit against the Bush administration. Maureen Dowd would be writing columns describing Khalid Sheik Mohammed as a "wannabe" terrorist being treated like Genghis Khan by an excitable Bush administration.




    We begin to forget what it was like to turn on the TV, see a tornado, a car chase or another Pamela Anderson marriage and think: Good -- another day without a terrorist attack.




    But liberals have only blind hatred for Bush -- and for those brute American interrogators who do not supply extra helpings of béarnaise sauce to the little darlings at Guantanamo with sufficient alacrity.




    The sheer repetition of lies about Bush is wearing people down. There is not a liberal in this country worthy of kissing Bush's rear end, but the weakest members of the herd run from Bush. Compared to the lickspittles denying and attacking him, Bush is a moral giant -- if that's not damning with faint praise. John McCain should be so lucky as to be running for Bush's third term. Then he might have a chance."




    Ann Coulter 6/08




    [/quote]




    Ann Coulter?? Really? You're going to use Ann Coulter as a reasonable arguement? Why didn't you just say "Mega-Dittos"? It would have saved a little cutting and pasting.




    Listen, I am not arguing for the Liberals in this country..........the ENTIRE system is broken. Nothing is going to change no matter what happens in November. The lack of actual demorcacy in our own government is astounding.




    [/quote]




    Aside from not liking her, can you point to any mistakes in her assessment?




    [/quote]




    You mean ASIDE from it being complete fabrication? No. She makes a very good (and quite funny ) arguement for her world of fantasy.

    And now, in the interest of equal time, here is a message from the National Institute of Pancakes: It reads, and I quote, “**** waffles.”......G Carlin

  2. #32

    Re: Sometimes we lose sight of what's really important

    [quote user="jints10"][quote user="daynemustgo"][quote user="FBomb"][quote user="daynemustgo"][quote user="FBomb"][quote user="daynemustgo"][quote user="jints10"]


    [quote user="RoanokeFan"]You have have to copy to your web browser. It's about real heroes who secure our freedom every day.


    http://s259.photobucket.com/albums/h...t=Untitled.flv
    [/quote]




    Its a sad world we live in , but we gotta keep it going over there so they don't bring it over here, again!




    [/quote]




    Such a simple and indisputable fact and yet it completely mystifies those on the left. They would prefer leaving it up tothe criminal justice system because that approach was oh so successful under Bubba.




    We owe everything to those folks over there.fficeffice" />>>







    [/quote]







    Fine, but the problem is "over there" should be Afganistan. Had we focused all of our attention there, this entire thing may have been over now........with Saddam still vertiually no threat to us.




    It s bogus war, and my support for the troops is about getting them out of harms way. Sadly, nothing will change no matter who gets into office. The entire system is 'on the take.' So you Liberals will be in for a shock if you thing "change" is coming. It isn't.




    [/quote]




    "In a conversation recently, I mentioned as an aside what a great president George Bush has been and my friend was surprised. I was surprised that he was surprised.




    I generally don'ttalk about the manifestly obvious, but, yes, the man responsible for keeping Americans safe from another terrorist attack on American soil for nearly seven years now will go down in history as one of America's greatest presidents.




    Produce one person who believed, on Sept. 12, 2001, that there would not be another attack for seven years, and I'll consider downgrading Bush from "Great" to "Really Good."




    Merely taking out Saddam Hussein and his winsome sons Uday and Qusay (Hussein family slogan: "We're the Rape Room People!") constitutes a greater humanitarian accomplishment than anything Bill Clinton ever did -- and I'm including remembering Monica's name on the sixth sexual encounter.




    But unlike liberals, who are so anxious to send American troops to Rwanda or Darfur, Republicans oppose deploying U.S. troops for purely humanitarian purposes. We invaded Iraq to protect America.




    It is unquestionable that Bush has made this country safe by keeping Islamic lunatics pinned down fighting our troops in Iraq. In the past few years, our brave troops have killed more than 20,000 al-Qaida and other Islamic militants in Iraq alone. That's 20,000 terrorists who will never board a plane headed for JFK -- or a landmark building, for that matter.




    We are, in fact, fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them at, say, the corner of 72nd and Columbus in Manhattan -- the mere mention of which never fails to enrage liberals, which is why you should say it as often as possible.




    The Iraq war has been a stunning success. The Iraqi army is "standing up" (as they say), fat Muqtada al-Sadr --the Dr. Phil of Islamofascist radicalism -- has waddled off in retreat to Iran, and Sadr City and Basra are no longer war zones. Our servicemen must be baffled by the constant nay-saying coming from their own country.




    The Iraqis have a democracy -- a miracle on the order of flush toilets in that godforsaken region of the world. Despite its newness, Iraq's democracy appears to be no more dysfunctional than one that would condemn a man who has kept the nation safe for seven years while deifying a man who has accomplished absolutely nothing in his entire life except to give speeches about "change."




    (Guess what Bill Clinton's campaign theme was in 1992? You are wrong if you guessed: "bringing dignity back to the White House." It was "change." In January 1992, James Carville told Steve Daley of The Chicago Tribune that it had gotten to the point that the press was complaining about Clinton's "constant talk of change.")




    Monthly casualties in Iraq now come in slightly lower than a weekend with Anna Nicole Smith. According to a CNN report last week, for the entire month of May, there were only 19 troop deaths in Iraq. (Last year, five people on average were shot every day in Chicago.) With Iraqi deaths at an all-time low, Iraq is safer than Detroit -- although the Middle Eastern food is still better in Detroit.




    Al-Qaida is virtually destroyed, surprising even the CIA. Two weeks ago, The Washington Post reported: "Less than a year after his agency warned of new threats from a resurgent al-Qaida, CIA Director Michael V. Hayden now portrays the terrorist movement as essentially defeated in Iraq and Saudi Arabia and on the defensive throughout much of the rest of the world, including in its presumed haven along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border."




    It's almost as if there's been some sort of "surge" going on, as strange as that sounds.




    Just this week, The New York Times reported that al-Qaida and other terrorist groups in Southeast Asia have all but disappeared, starved of money and support. The U.S. and Australia have been working closely with the Philippines, Malaysia and Indonesia, sending them counterterrorism equipment and personnel.




    But no one notices when 9/11 doesn't happen. Indeed, if we had somehow stopped the 9/11 attack, we'd all be watching Mohammed Atta being interviewed on MSNBC, explaining his lawsuit against the Bush administration. Maureen Dowd would be writing columns describing Khalid Sheik Mohammed as a "wannabe" terrorist being treated like Genghis Khan by an excitable Bush administration.




    We begin to forget what it was like to turn on the TV, see a tornado, a car chase or another Pamela Anderson marriage and think: Good -- another day without a terrorist attack.




    But liberals have only blind hatred for Bush -- and for those brute American interrogators who do not supply extra helpings of béarnaise sauce to the little darlings at Guantanamo with sufficient alacrity.




    The sheer repetition of lies about Bush is wearing people down. There is not a liberal in this country worthy of kissing Bush's rear end, but the weakest members of the herd run from Bush. Compared to the lickspittles denying and attacking him, Bush is a moral giant -- if that's not damning with faint praise. John McCain should be so lucky as to be running for Bush's third term. Then he might have a chance."




    Ann Coulter 6/08




    [/quote]




    Ann Coulter?? Really? You're going to use Ann Coulter as a reasonable arguement? Why didn't you just say "Mega-Dittos"? It would have saved a little cutting and pasting.




    Listen, I am not arguing for the Liberals in this country..........the ENTIRE system is broken. Nothing is going to change no matter what happens in November. The lack of actual demorcacy in our own government is astounding.




    [/quote]




    Aside from not liking her, can you point to any mistakes in her assessment?




    [/quote]




    Unfortunately fbomb rarely offers opinions but is quick to mock yours




    [/quote]




    He's a good poster and I am always interested in hearing his opinions.


  3. #33
    All-Pro FBomb's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    27,957

    Re: Sometimes we lose sight of what's really important

    [quote user="jints10"][quote user="daynemustgo"][quote user="FBomb"][quote user="daynemustgo"][quote user="FBomb"][quote user="daynemustgo"][quote user="jints10"]


    [quote user="RoanokeFan"]You have have to copy to your web browser. It's about real heroes who secure our freedom every day.


    http://s259.photobucket.com/albums/h...t=Untitled.flv
    [/quote]




    Its a sad world we live in , but we gotta keep it going over there so they don't bring it over here, again!




    [/quote]




    Such a simple and indisputable fact and yet it completely mystifies those on the left. They would prefer leaving it up tothe criminal justice system because that approach was oh so successful under Bubba.




    We owe everything to those folks over there.fficeffice" />>>







    [/quote]







    Fine, but the problem is "over there" should be Afganistan. Had we focused all of our attention there, this entire thing may have been over now........with Saddam still vertiually no threat to us.




    It s bogus war, and my support for the troops is about getting them out of harms way. Sadly, nothing will change no matter who gets into office. The entire system is 'on the take.' So you Liberals will be in for a shock if you thing "change" is coming. It isn't.




    [/quote]




    "In a conversation recently, I mentioned as an aside what a great president George Bush has been and my friend was surprised. I was surprised that he was surprised.




    I generally don'ttalk about the manifestly obvious, but, yes, the man responsible for keeping Americans safe from another terrorist attack on American soil for nearly seven years now will go down in history as one of America's greatest presidents.




    Produce one person who believed, on Sept. 12, 2001, that there would not be another attack for seven years, and I'll consider downgrading Bush from "Great" to "Really Good."




    Merely taking out Saddam Hussein and his winsome sons Uday and Qusay (Hussein family slogan: "We're the Rape Room People!") constitutes a greater humanitarian accomplishment than anything Bill Clinton ever did -- and I'm including remembering Monica's name on the sixth sexual encounter.




    But unlike liberals, who are so anxious to send American troops to Rwanda or Darfur, Republicans oppose deploying U.S. troops for purely humanitarian purposes. We invaded Iraq to protect America.




    It is unquestionable that Bush has made this country safe by keeping Islamic lunatics pinned down fighting our troops in Iraq. In the past few years, our brave troops have killed more than 20,000 al-Qaida and other Islamic militants in Iraq alone. That's 20,000 terrorists who will never board a plane headed for JFK -- or a landmark building, for that matter.




    We are, in fact, fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them at, say, the corner of 72nd and Columbus in Manhattan -- the mere mention of which never fails to enrage liberals, which is why you should say it as often as possible.




    The Iraq war has been a stunning success. The Iraqi army is "standing up" (as they say), fat Muqtada al-Sadr --the Dr. Phil of Islamofascist radicalism -- has waddled off in retreat to Iran, and Sadr City and Basra are no longer war zones. Our servicemen must be baffled by the constant nay-saying coming from their own country.




    The Iraqis have a democracy -- a miracle on the order of flush toilets in that godforsaken region of the world. Despite its newness, Iraq's democracy appears to be no more dysfunctional than one that would condemn a man who has kept the nation safe for seven years while deifying a man who has accomplished absolutely nothing in his entire life except to give speeches about "change."




    (Guess what Bill Clinton's campaign theme was in 1992? You are wrong if you guessed: "bringing dignity back to the White House." It was "change." In January 1992, James Carville told Steve Daley of The Chicago Tribune that it had gotten to the point that the press was complaining about Clinton's "constant talk of change.")




    Monthly casualties in Iraq now come in slightly lower than a weekend with Anna Nicole Smith. According to a CNN report last week, for the entire month of May, there were only 19 troop deaths in Iraq. (Last year, five people on average were shot every day in Chicago.) With Iraqi deaths at an all-time low, Iraq is safer than Detroit -- although the Middle Eastern food is still better in Detroit.




    Al-Qaida is virtually destroyed, surprising even the CIA. Two weeks ago, The Washington Post reported: "Less than a year after his agency warned of new threats from a resurgent al-Qaida, CIA Director Michael V. Hayden now portrays the terrorist movement as essentially defeated in Iraq and Saudi Arabia and on the defensive throughout much of the rest of the world, including in its presumed haven along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border."




    It's almost as if there's been some sort of "surge" going on, as strange as that sounds.




    Just this week, The New York Times reported that al-Qaida and other terrorist groups in Southeast Asia have all but disappeared, starved of money and support. The U.S. and Australia have been working closely with the Philippines, Malaysia and Indonesia, sending them counterterrorism equipment and personnel.




    But no one notices when 9/11 doesn't happen. Indeed, if we had somehow stopped the 9/11 attack, we'd all be watching Mohammed Atta being interviewed on MSNBC, explaining his lawsuit against the Bush administration. Maureen Dowd would be writing columns describing Khalid Sheik Mohammed as a "wannabe" terrorist being treated like Genghis Khan by an excitable Bush administration.




    We begin to forget what it was like to turn on the TV, see a tornado, a car chase or another Pamela Anderson marriage and think: Good -- another day without a terrorist attack.




    But liberals have only blind hatred for Bush -- and for those brute American interrogators who do not supply extra helpings of béarnaise sauce to the little darlings at Guantanamo with sufficient alacrity.




    The sheer repetition of lies about Bush is wearing people down. There is not a liberal in this country worthy of kissing Bush's rear end, but the weakest members of the herd run from Bush. Compared to the lickspittles denying and attacking him, Bush is a moral giant -- if that's not damning with faint praise. John McCain should be so lucky as to be running for Bush's third term. Then he might have a chance."




    Ann Coulter 6/08




    [/quote]




    Ann Coulter?? Really? You're going to use Ann Coulter as a reasonable arguement? Why didn't you just say "Mega-Dittos"? It would have saved a little cutting and pasting.




    Listen, I am not arguing for the Liberals in this country..........the ENTIRE system is broken. Nothing is going to change no matter what happens in November. The lack of actual demorcacy in our own government is astounding.




    [/quote]




    Aside from not liking her, can you point to any mistakes in her assessment?




    [/quote]




    Unfortunately fbomb rarely offers opinions but is quick to mock yours




    [/quote]







    aww.....somones feelings are hurt because people don't agree with him. Poor lil feller.

    And now, in the interest of equal time, here is a message from the National Institute of Pancakes: It reads, and I quote, “**** waffles.”......G Carlin

  4. #34

    Re: Sometimes we lose sight of what's really important

    [quote user="FBomb"][quote user="daynemustgo"][quote user="FBomb"][quote user="daynemustgo"][quote user="FBomb"][quote user="daynemustgo"][quote user="jints10"]


    [quote user="RoanokeFan"]You have have to copy to your web browser. It's about real heroes who secure our freedom every day.


    http://s259.photobucket.com/albums/h...t=Untitled.flv
    [/quote]




    Its a sad world we live in , but we gotta keep it going over there so they don't bring it over here, again!




    [/quote]




    Such a simple and indisputable fact and yet it completely mystifies those on the left. They would prefer leaving it up tothe criminal justice system because that approach was oh so successful under Bubba.




    We owe everything to those folks over there.fficeffice" />>>







    [/quote]







    Fine, but the problem is "over there" should be Afganistan. Had we focused all of our attention there, this entire thing may have been over now........with Saddam still vertiually no threat to us.




    It s bogus war, and my support for the troops is about getting them out of harms way. Sadly, nothing will change no matter who gets into office. The entire system is 'on the take.' So you Liberals will be in for a shock if you thing "change" is coming. It isn't.




    [/quote]




    "In a conversation recently, I mentioned as an aside what a great president George Bush has been and my friend was surprised. I was surprised that he was surprised.




    I generally don'ttalk about the manifestly obvious, but, yes, the man responsible for keeping Americans safe from another terrorist attack on American soil for nearly seven years now will go down in history as one of America's greatest presidents.




    Produce one person who believed, on Sept. 12, 2001, that there would not be another attack for seven years, and I'll consider downgrading Bush from "Great" to "Really Good."




    Merely taking out Saddam Hussein and his winsome sons Uday and Qusay (Hussein family slogan: "We're the Rape Room People!") constitutes a greater humanitarian accomplishment than anything Bill Clinton ever did -- and I'm including remembering Monica's name on the sixth sexual encounter.




    But unlike liberals, who are so anxious to send American troops to Rwanda or Darfur, Republicans oppose deploying U.S. troops for purely humanitarian purposes. We invaded Iraq to protect America.




    It is unquestionable that Bush has made this country safe by keeping Islamic lunatics pinned down fighting our troops in Iraq. In the past few years, our brave troops have killed more than 20,000 al-Qaida and other Islamic militants in Iraq alone. That's 20,000 terrorists who will never board a plane headed for JFK -- or a landmark building, for that matter.




    We are, in fact, fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them at, say, the corner of 72nd and Columbus in Manhattan -- the mere mention of which never fails to enrage liberals, which is why you should say it as often as possible.




    The Iraq war has been a stunning success. The Iraqi army is "standing up" (as they say), fat Muqtada al-Sadr --the Dr. Phil of Islamofascist radicalism -- has waddled off in retreat to Iran, and Sadr City and Basra are no longer war zones. Our servicemen must be baffled by the constant nay-saying coming from their own country.




    The Iraqis have a democracy -- a miracle on the order of flush toilets in that godforsaken region of the world. Despite its newness, Iraq's democracy appears to be no more dysfunctional than one that would condemn a man who has kept the nation safe for seven years while deifying a man who has accomplished absolutely nothing in his entire life except to give speeches about "change."




    (Guess what Bill Clinton's campaign theme was in 1992? You are wrong if you guessed: "bringing dignity back to the White House." It was "change." In January 1992, James Carville told Steve Daley of The Chicago Tribune that it had gotten to the point that the press was complaining about Clinton's "constant talk of change.")




    Monthly casualties in Iraq now come in slightly lower than a weekend with Anna Nicole Smith. According to a CNN report last week, for the entire month of May, there were only 19 troop deaths in Iraq. (Last year, five people on average were shot every day in Chicago.) With Iraqi deaths at an all-time low, Iraq is safer than Detroit -- although the Middle Eastern food is still better in Detroit.




    Al-Qaida is virtually destroyed, surprising even the CIA. Two weeks ago, The Washington Post reported: "Less than a year after his agency warned of new threats from a resurgent al-Qaida, CIA Director Michael V. Hayden now portrays the terrorist movement as essentially defeated in Iraq and Saudi Arabia and on the defensive throughout much of the rest of the world, including in its presumed haven along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border."




    It's almost as if there's been some sort of "surge" going on, as strange as that sounds.




    Just this week, The New York Times reported that al-Qaida and other terrorist groups in Southeast Asia have all but disappeared, starved of money and support. The U.S. and Australia have been working closely with the Philippines, Malaysia and Indonesia, sending them counterterrorism equipment and personnel.




    But no one notices when 9/11 doesn't happen. Indeed, if we had somehow stopped the 9/11 attack, we'd all be watching Mohammed Atta being interviewed on MSNBC, explaining his lawsuit against the Bush administration. Maureen Dowd would be writing columns describing Khalid Sheik Mohammed as a "wannabe" terrorist being treated like Genghis Khan by an excitable Bush administration.




    We begin to forget what it was like to turn on the TV, see a tornado, a car chase or another Pamela Anderson marriage and think: Good -- another day without a terrorist attack.




    But liberals have only blind hatred for Bush -- and for those brute American interrogators who do not supply extra helpings of béarnaise sauce to the little darlings at Guantanamo with sufficient alacrity.




    The sheer repetition of lies about Bush is wearing people down. There is not a liberal in this country worthy of kissing Bush's rear end, but the weakest members of the herd run from Bush. Compared to the lickspittles denying and attacking him, Bush is a moral giant -- if that's not damning with faint praise. John McCain should be so lucky as to be running for Bush's third term. Then he might have a chance."




    Ann Coulter 6/08




    [/quote]




    Ann Coulter?? Really? You're going to use Ann Coulter as a reasonable arguement? Why didn't you just say "Mega-Dittos"? It would have saved a little cutting and pasting.




    Listen, I am not arguing for the Liberals in this country..........the ENTIRE system is broken. Nothing is going to change no matter what happens in November. The lack of actual demorcacy in our own government is astounding.




    [/quote]




    Aside from not liking her, can you point to any mistakes in her assessment?




    [/quote]




    You mean ASIDE from it being complete fabrication? No. She makes a very good (and quite funny ) arguement for her world of fantasy.




    [/quote]




    Fair enough


  5. #35

    Re: Sometimes we lose sight of what's really important

    Great video. I won't delete the thread, but I will have to lock it because we can't have this kind of conversation. We can barely get civilized football conversations going around here, nevermind politics or religion. Sorry guys

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts