+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    All-Pro joemorrisforprez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    12,093

    According to NY Daily News, Bradshaw expected to return, start v. Eagles


    "..... Bradshaw was cleared by doctors on Monday to return to practice this week, according to a source familiar with his situation. ..... Bradshaw is expected to reclaim his starting job if he’s healthy, though it’s hard to imagine Brown being relegated to the bench. Tom Coughlin has yet to address the situation, but he did say, “There’s a place for everybody.”
    Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/fo...#ixzz27Ro8aVLM

  2. #2
    As bad as this sounds, I'm not sure how I feel about this. I really want to see more of Brown at #1.
    Last edited by Giant stuck in Texas; 09-25-2012 at 12:39 AM.

  3. #3

    Having two great back is better than having one!

    Quote Originally Posted by Giant stuck in Texas View Post
    As bad as this sounds, I'm not sure how I feel about this. I really want to see more of Brown at #1.
    Keep them fresh and tire out the D! GO GIANTS!!!

  4. #4
    Veteran Cool Papa B.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    1,839
    IMO, Bradshaw will start, but Brown will get the majority of the carries.

  5. #5
    there's carries to go around ... Wilson is the odd man out ... but even he can get touches just like Ware did last year

    personally, with Bradshaw having the neck issue, my gut is Brown will start vs. Philly

    but the following week there will be a decision to make esp. if Brown has another standout game ... if he just has an average game, then the start will go back to Bradshaw, but i see a "hot hand" approach at RB from here on out as far as who gets the most carries, so long as Brown dont have ball security or pass protection issues (he did have 1 pass protection issue vs. Carolina)

    good issue to have ... competition is great, depth is great and at RB you need at least 2 anyway
    Apologize to Melo 5

  6. #6
    All-Pro Captain Chaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Alexandria, Va
    Posts
    10,741
    I only want Bradshaw to play if he is healthy, I think with the line starting to solidify we may see a resurgence from him.

  7. #7
    Veteran RagTime Blue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Carlstadt, NJ
    Posts
    4,040
    Brown's solid play could make the difference over the course of the year. And with all due respect to his performance, he had a superior line working in front of him.

    All I'm saying is that this can't be a bad thing. . .having two backs that can get the job done.
    We need our coaches to assign playing time based on something other than player salary.

  8. #8
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    4,557
    Remember when it was BJ, AB, and Ward. Having several good RB's is a good thing. Whoever has the hot hand gets the rock.

  9. #9
    Starter
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    221
    I sincerely hope the emergence of Brown lights a fire under Bradshaw's *** and gets him going...

  10. #10
    Veteran ryan12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    RUDYY IS THE MIKE!!!!!
    Posts
    4,762
    Quote Originally Posted by Cool Papa B. View Post
    IMO, Bradshaw will start, but Brown will get the majority of the carries.
    agreed ive been saying that since last Friday bradshaw will start get between 8-12 touches brown between 12-15 touches.
    FUTURE NFL STAR



    2014 season
    23 rushes for 255yards 3td
    39 pancake blocks
    50 tackles 3 sacks (3 td saving tackles including final tackle as time expired to clinch win, hit of the game 9/14 & 10/26 )
    9-0-1 record///// invited to play in tiny mite bowl and beat the team we tied in regular season
    youtube (youth football Iselin Giants and look for video that's 4 mins 19sec)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts