+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 49 of 49
  1. #41
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    589
    I love seeing Giants fans cry over the refs against us last year. Too bad so sad.

  2. #42
    All-Pro Eliscruzzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Warwick NY
    Posts
    6,520
    Quote Originally Posted by Rodgers12 View Post
    I love seeing Giants fans cry over the refs against us last year. Too bad so sad.
    It's funny cause I don't remember our players crying as much as the Packers are I think Aaron Rodgers is still crying.... he is such a baby man wawawawa sorry fans this and that he is just as much as a diva as Farve. Maybe he shouldn't have done the six shooters ****y loser they got what was coming to them....but hey you got your little butt buddies back so you'll probably get every call cause of lord Rodgers so you should be happy.

  3. #43
    it could have gone either way...IMO, it's not a catch until the receivers ("O" or "D") feet hit the ground....

  4. #44
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    11,197
    With Tate's leg blocking the view of his hands we will never know

    All of the "Experts" who got the same blocked view we got, and the replay official got are shooting in the dark

    The Official with the best view of who had hands on the ball made the call.....why he is so mistrusted is beyond me

    It had the effect of ending the strike, and it also paid GB back for the blown calls in our game last Dec 11th........so lets move on

  5. #45
    Veteran Rusty192's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Chad
    Posts
    3,890
    Quote Originally Posted by Rodgers12 View Post
    I love seeing Giants fans cry over the refs against us last year. Too bad so sad.
    cmon Lambeau i thought you were alright.

    now you are talking a ton of trash on us and sound pretty bitter. Are you really that obsessed with our team?

  6. #46
    All-Pro Drez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    14,591
    Quote Originally Posted by blueomaha View Post
    it could have gone either way...IMO, it's not a catch until the receivers ("O" or "D") feet hit the ground....
    For it to be a simultaneous catch 4 hands must reach the ball at the same time. If one player has possession first, then the second also gains possession before hitting the ground, it is not a simultaneous catch. The team that the player that first came into possession of the ball is given possession.

  7. #47
    All-Pro Drez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    14,591
    Quote Originally Posted by Rusty192 View Post
    cmon Lambeau i thought you were alright.

    now you are talking a ton of trash on us and sound pretty bitter. Are you really that obsessed with our team?
    No, it's his Friday night Tear in My Beer ritual.

  8. #48
    Bench Player
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by Drez View Post
    For it to be a simultaneous catch 4 hands must reach the ball at the same time. If one player has possession first, then the second also gains possession before hitting the ground, it is not a simultaneous catch. The team that the player that first came into possession of the ball is given possession.
    I agree with this statement except for where you say "4 hands must reach the ball at the same time." Why can it be 3 hands? Are catches solely made with one hand not considered catches?

  9. #49
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,990
    Hahaha refs screw over Green Bay again!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts