+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1

    wait until nicks cimes back

    barden is no nicks. We would kill the eagles defense if nicks is there. Im pissed.

  2. #2
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    San Jose, Costa Rica
    Posts
    524
    nicks is the best against bump and run coverage.. barden.. well lets just say is not.. we needed nicks today..

  3. #3
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    9,621
    Yes, Nicks is the reason why they didn't win tonight. What about all the games against the Eagles he played in and they lost? Nicks has played in exactly 1 game against the Eagles that the Giants have won. The Eagles just own the Giants and no one player is the difference.

  4. #4
    Moderator RoanokeFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    99,203
    Quote Originally Posted by VBGiantsFan View Post
    barden is no nicks. We would kill the eagles defense if nicks is there. Im pissed.
    Having Nicks back would be great, but Cruz had a 100 yard game and Hixon had a 114 yard game. Barden had a great game in Carolina but, as some tried to point out, the defense was playing so far off it was like pitch and catch with Eli. In press coverage, he struggles.
    “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1


  5. #5
    All-Pro egyptian420's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    11,293
    Quote Originally Posted by RoanokeFan View Post
    Having Nicks back would be great, but Cruz had a 100 yard game and Hixon had a 114 yard game.
    I think for this reason our offense will perform better when it's Nicks, Cruz, and Hixon with Barden being matched up on a dime CB like last week.

  6. #6
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    9,621
    Why? Why would Nicks make a difference? He has played them a bunch o times already and has only been in 1 game that they beat the Eagles.

  7. #7
    Nicks wouldn't have made a difference. Even if he played, it only means we would've found another dumb way to lose a close game to those feathered ****bags

  8. #8
    All-Pro Eliscruzzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Warwick NY
    Posts
    6,520
    Yes Nicks was heavily missed tonight he had to be sick watching that game.....

  9. #9
    IMO, we would have lost this game with Nicks anyways. Hixon more than handled his business in Nicks' absence, something I did not expect at all.

  10. #10
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    9,621
    Exactly. It's not like Hixon didn't have a good game. Nicks has been on the losing side a number of times when the played the Eagles. Why would tonight be any different.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts