+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 70

Thread: Why the Nicks injury is actually a positive

  1. #1

    Why the Nicks injury is actually a positive

    I want Nicks out there as much as anybody (he's killing my fantasy team), but in the long run I think this is a positive.

    If Nicks had a monster year he would be in line for a HUGE contract. He would probably be looking for something just short of Larry Fitz money. Given the Giants have to take care of Cruz with JPP (highest paid defender ever?) on the horizon, I don't know if they would have sprung for that. Now Nicks can't possibly expect a monster contract mainly because of his injury history. Certainly he is due a raise, but it shouldn't be a cap-crippling contract. This way we can keep both Cruz and Nicks for years to come.

  2. #2
    its true. that is one small positive that comes from this.

    but i dont think nicks is as hurt as some (buddy) around here say. i'd bet he returns for the SF game. pretty much every nfl player would aggravate their knees if they went from strict rest all week, to full bore on gamedays...he'll be alright. but that is a good bargaining chip altho it could also work against us bc Nicks could believe he is worth x amount of dollars and JR believes he's worth y amount, and JR wont overpay for any FA from his past dealings...so...

  3. #3
    Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Cliffside Park, NJ
    Posts
    4,723
    Quote Originally Posted by Riverboat76 View Post
    I want Nicks out there as much as anybody (he's killing my fantasy team), but in the long run I think this is a positive.

    If Nicks had a monster year he would be in line for a HUGE contract. He would probably be looking for something just short of Larry Fitz money. Given the Giants have to take care of Cruz with JPP (highest paid defender ever?) on the horizon, I don't know if they would have sprung for that. Now Nicks can't possibly expect a monster contract mainly because of his injury history. Certainly he is due a raise, but it shouldn't be a cap-crippling contract. This way we can keep both Cruz and Nicks for years to come.
    When the time comes I guarantee you Nicks (if he recovers fully from what nags him now and avoids further more significant injuries) gets more than Cruz. If Cruz is agreeable to that because he is more endorseable (off the field endorsements) than Nicks then the Giants will hopefully be able to find a way to keep them both.
    Last edited by repeatchamps; 10-04-2012 at 02:10 PM.
    Over 5500 posts, advanced member, joined March 2002. 1st post (as anonymous) was the day after Super Bowl 35

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Riverboat76 View Post
    I want Nicks out there as much as anybody (he's killing my fantasy team), but in the long run I think this is a positive.

    If Nicks had a monster year he would be in line for a HUGE contract. He would probably be looking for something just short of Larry Fitz money. Given the Giants have to take care of Cruz with JPP (highest paid defender ever?) on the horizon, I don't know if they would have sprung for that. Now Nicks can't possibly expect a monster contract mainly because of his injury history. Certainly he is due a raise, but it shouldn't be a cap-crippling contract. This way we can keep both Cruz and Nicks for years to come.
    Didn't the Giants throw a bunch of money a T2? (I know there were outs written into the contract but we shouldn't have offered him a copper penny)

    The Giants are willy nilly with their money which is why we're always in cap hell.

    And Nicks is gonna want that Larry Fitz money regardless. A swollen knee and a broken bone in the foot does not translate to an injury risk on the open market.
    My 5 year old son right before the kickoff of the Super Bowl 46: Dad, are the Giants gonna win?

    Burier: Yes.

    My 5 year old son right before the kickoff of Super Bowl 46: Do you promise?

    Burier: Yes. I promise.

  5. #5
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    9,843
    Here is nothing good that can come from losing a top 5 WR. Tell us this if they miss the playoffs or lose another divisional game and he is in the bench.

  6. #6
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    9,843
    I'm sure Nicks has an agent who would laugh at his idea. He has put up the numbers to get him the money. If the Giants can't afford him or try to low ball him because he is hurt he will leave.

  7. #7
    This is just a wishful thinking of a fan, Nicks will get his money, Giants would be fools to expect a discount deal out of Nicks. I only hope that FO would not think too little of Nicks and let him go and think they'll find another Nicks right away or something, Nicks is one of those WRs who only comes around once a decade.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Buddy333 View Post
    I'm sure Nicks has an agent who would laugh at his idea. He has put up the numbers to get him the money. If the Giants can't afford him or try to low ball him because he is hurt he will leave.
    Agree with this. IMO they will offer him something similar to what they offered smith after his monster year, adjusted for inflation of course. That is, if they can find the cap room.

  9. #9
    No, the injury to our #1 WR is not a positive no matter how you spin it. It sucks.

  10. #10
    The Redskins or Raiders will pay him top dollar if we won't (ie: Cornelius Griffin, Barry Cofield, Gibril Wilson, Kevin Boss). Sure he might lose some money due to his injury history, but Reese should still give him a deserving contract considering what he's done and how important he actually is to this offense.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts