+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: Postitve Nicks Update

  1. #11
    Veteran ebick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,308
    Quote Originally Posted by GiantFanatic55 View Post
    GiantsWFAN ‏@giantswfan
    Nicks watching and moving around a bit.....thinking a good sign for SF
    (so as not to get banned for positive posting) we've pretty much been hearing this kind of message on him every week, no?

  2. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by GameTime View Post
    Nicks will be on the field when ready. I will not payattenton to anything until I see him line up. When ever that may be.
    This.

  3. #13
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    9,986
    Quote Originally Posted by RoanokeFan View Post
    In the meantime we have receivers who can get the job done
    I hope your right. I think they need a 3rd potion at WR and right now they don't have a proven one. To bad about Barden because I thought he was coming along nicely the past 2 games.

  4. #14
    Moderator RoanokeFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    102,271
    Quote Originally Posted by Toadofsteel View Post
    I'm more concerned about Hosley being out at this point. We have WR depth that can get it done (Cruz and Hixon come to mind, and even Barden is stepping up). But there's only 2 corners on our roster that can get it done as far as I'm concerned: Prince and Hosley. C-web looks old and washed out, Tryon is terrible, and Coe is too underwhelming but at least serviceable in the nickel...
    I agree about Hosley
    “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1






    # 80

  5. #15
    If we have Hosley, Webster, Prince, and Rivers healthy for the 49ers I will feel good going into that game. With or without Nicks.

  6. #16
    Moderator RoanokeFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    102,271
    Quote Originally Posted by Buddy333 View Post
    I hope your right. I think they need a 3rd potion at WR and right now they don't have a proven one. To bad about Barden because I thought he was coming along nicely the past 2 games.
    That's true, but with all of the hub bub surrounding Randle's "work ethic" he has a golden opportunity to shut them all up...or not. We'll be fine with Cruz, Hixon, Bennett, Hynoski, and Pascoe. Randle will be a bonus is he can step up.
    “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1






    # 80

  7. #17
    Veteran BlueJayC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Hoboken, NJ
    Posts
    1,431

  8. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by RoanokeFan View Post
    That's true, but with all of the hub bub surrounding Randle's "work ethic" he has a golden opportunity to shut them all up...or not. We'll be fine with Cruz, Hixon, Bennett, Hynoski, and Pascoe. Randle will be a bonus is he can step up.
    I 'd rather throw to JJ than count on much from Hynoski.

  9. #19
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Jimi Hendrix Sept 18, 1970 RIP
    Posts
    26,926
    Quote Originally Posted by Shockeystays08 View Post
    I 'd rather throw to JJ than count on much from Hynoski.
    not dogging either player but why?
    Also they play radically different postions so why compare the two....
    "Measure Twice......Cut Once"
    You couldn't be more full of **** if you were break dancing in a Port-a-Potty.......Kruunch

  10. #20
    Moderator RoanokeFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    102,271
    Quote Originally Posted by Shockeystays08 View Post
    I 'd rather throw to JJ than count on much from Hynoski.
    Really?
    “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1






    # 80

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts