Either way, the 200yds and kudos should go to our offensive line, Pascoe, and Bennett. They are the unsung heroes of our running game.
Either way, the 200yds and kudos should go to our offensive line, Pascoe, and Bennett. They are the unsung heroes of our running game.
which is exactly what Bradshaw did.....Originally Posted by CowboysSuck
Eli gave them props
Tuck gave them props..
they are not unsung or unoticed
Measure Twice......Cut Once"
more carries = more chances to get injured.
Bradshaw was having a great game, no doubt, but there really is no reason they could not have used Wilson more than 2 snaps all game.
If David Wilson had the handoff in the same exact play every single time that Bradshaw was given the ball, I think Wilson could have had like 270 yds.
purely hypothetical but interesting to think about
I get it the ratio thing......
it is what it is.....no harm done so move on....
Measure Twice......Cut Once"
Im not upset about the game, but going forward it needs to change, Wilson needs to get more snaps. This 1 or 2 snaps on offense a game thing is ridiculous.
Slipknottin we often to dot agree but I couldn't be happier that someone agrees with my simple point that Wilson deserves more than 2..count it TWO handoffs a game.
Lets also not forget the fact that every single play Wilson has been given the handoff, the opposing defense is 99% sure he is getting the ball. This is practically a lose-lose situation for any RB in the league, I dont care if you are Adrian Peterson in his rookie year.
so whats the real complaint...
Bradshaw staying in too long or Wilson not getting enough carries????
No worries the kind will be a dynamic player for this team. They have shown confidence in him as a return guy which requires good hands and ball security and now he has htis run. He will get his chance as RB.
Measure Twice......Cut Once"
The complaint has always been for more touches for Wilson. No one is taking anything away from AB, just that (I think) Wilson deserves more than TWO carries a game.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote