From the Clips point of you
1. Helps them keep Chris Paul
2. Best player in the trade
3. Wont be able to resign Bledsoe
jordan at least hustles and is a great shot blocker. he is also better offensively other than free throw shooting. i think that trade is realistic. they would probably try to get us to add shump which i would not want to do. i'd swap chandler straight up for jordan if they would do it. he's more athletic, younger, and like i said is a great shot blocker. at least he could potentially get better. tyson is only going to get worse at this stage of his career.
i was looking at the knicks salaries... and man just imagine if all that money spent on amare, chandler, novak and camby was spent on players that could have actually helped in that series. most of the best knicks players throughout the playoffs (other than melo) were guys on cheap deals like pablo, cope, felton, kmart, shump, etc.
Dont know if Id swap them straight up Id want some other asset a late 1st. I doubt we could get Bledsoe and Jordan and I agree they would probably ask for Shump. I was wondering if our 1st this year along with Chandler and Kidd would be enough.
Judging from the papers, were gonna have pretty much the exact same team going forward.. Minus a minor role players here or there.. They seem to think JR Smith is coming back, along with Tyson Chandler.. I'm not that excited about seeing a team that won 50plus games in the regular season and then flopped for the most part in the postseason, and never looked right offensively.. We can win 50plus games and still wonder if we'll instantly struggle in the postseason..