+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Would the 49ers bite on a 4th or 5th in 2013...

  1. #1

    Would the 49ers bite on a 4th or 5th in 2013...

    for Jacobs? (edit: I meant jacobs now, but didn't know we were past trade deadline already...)

    He's doing absolutely nothing over there. All their other RBs panned out (part of the reason they got Jacobs was for insurance against Hunter and Dixon). You can bet this wasn't what Jacobs had in mind when he left over 500k. He'd probably bite on a vet min deal just so he could get one last hurrah on the field. He knows our blocking schemes.
    Last edited by Toadofsteel; 11-13-2012 at 04:29 PM.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mercury View Post
    We need a tight end,
    repeat, again and again
    ToadofSteel's mantra.

  2. #2
    All-Pro Rudyy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Posts
    30,171
    Eh,
    I think we moved on from Jacobs.

    MUCH better.

  3. #3
    All-Pro Eliscruzzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Warwick NY
    Posts
    6,510
    I love what Jacobs brought and I can only imagine that he would've fired up this offense in a positive way but we have moved on.

  4. #4
    Oh and for the record I would only condone something like this if Bradshaw ends up on IR. I like it as a better option than bringing in some unknown that got cut by Chicago...

    Quote Originally Posted by Mercury View Post
    We need a tight end,
    repeat, again and again
    ToadofSteel's mantra.

  5. #5
    Jacobs has a better chance of getting released and up for grabs.

  6. #6
    All-Pro ny06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    13,809
    Using a draft pick for an ageing running back would not be what I call smart decision. And if I was the 49ers; I would jump on that trade in a heart beat.

    Giants fan since the early 80s

  7. #7
    Hall of Famer Harooni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Think Big Rudy
    Posts
    57,885
    trade deadline?
    The pessimist complains about the wind;
    The optimist expects it to change;
    The realist adjusts the sails."
    - William Arthur Ward -

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Harooni View Post
    trade deadline?
    He said 2013 but it's still a bad trade. It's so easy to find good RBs in the late rounds that are 10 years younger.

  9. #9
    Hall of Famer Harooni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Think Big Rudy
    Posts
    57,885
    Quote Originally Posted by TheEnigma View Post
    He said 2013 but it's still a bad trade. It's so easy to find good RBs in the late rounds that are 10 years younger.
    oh yeah i thought he meant trade now for 2013 picks. but bye next year BJ will be older and he most likely wont last a full season
    The pessimist complains about the wind;
    The optimist expects it to change;
    The realist adjusts the sails."
    - William Arthur Ward -

  10. #10
    I meant a 2013 pick for jacobs now... but i wasnt aware we were past trade deadline. So yeah, forget that.

    I'm just trying to make the best of a bad situation... if Bradshaw is out for the season, we need someone to share carries with Brown. It would be nice if the coaches would let Wilson do his thing, but they just seem to refuse to. And for some reason they think bringing in a UDFA cut by chicago is a good idea. I'd rather activate Martinek off the PS, but they seem to want someone with veteran experience. Jacobs would have been the perfect candidate for that...
    Last edited by Toadofsteel; 11-13-2012 at 04:23 PM.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mercury View Post
    We need a tight end,
    repeat, again and again
    ToadofSteel's mantra.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts