+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 41

Thread: Andre Brown?

  1. #1
    Bench Player Walshl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    6

    Question Andre Brown?

    I've been seeing all these posts on the board about the giants trying out all these different running backs. What i don't understand is if bradshaw is injured, and is not able to play then why don't the coaches see we have our answer with Andre Brown and David Wilson. Andre Brown is averaging 5.4 yards a carry and has 7 touchdowns with an average offensive line that has been horrible in the run blocking department.

  2. #2
    Moderator RoanokeFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    95,669
    Quote Originally Posted by Walshl View Post
    I've been seeing all these posts on the board about the giants trying out all these different running backs. What i don't understand is if bradshaw is injured, and is not able to play then why don't the coaches see we have our answer with Andre Brown and David Wilson. Andre Brown is averaging 5.4 yards a carry and has 7 touchdowns with an average offensive line that has been horrible in the run blocking department.
    If Bradshaw can't play, Brown becomes # 1 and Wilson # 2. Have you seen some quote from a coach that it would be otherwise?
    “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1


  3. #3
    Like it was said in all the other threads, if Bradshaw goes to IR, we need another #3 back. Brown, Wilson, and new guy.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by timmytimm3 View Post
    Like it was said in all the other threads, if Bradshaw goes to IR, we need another #3 back. Brown, Wilson, and new guy.
    In that situation, I'd rather promote Martinek than bring in some FA...

    Quote Originally Posted by Mercury View Post
    We need a tight end,
    repeat, again and again
    ToadofSteel's mantra.

  5. #5
    Moderator RoanokeFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    95,669
    Quote Originally Posted by timmytimm3 View Post
    Like it was said in all the other threads, if Bradshaw goes to IR, we need another #3 back. Brown, Wilson, and new guy.
    The new guy could be Martinek who knows the playbook
    “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1


  6. #6
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    908
    If all else fails, pull Ron Dayne out of moth balls.

  7. #7
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    2,300
    the way the coaches are playing an injured Bradshaw, they're gonna end his career or make it very short

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Cloud57 View Post
    the way the coaches are playing an injured Bradshaw, they're gonna end his career or make it very short
    This is what I was worried about... Bradshaw can't handle a full workload for very long before his feet break down. Now we're paying for it, because our coaches are too ****ing stupid to use Brown more often...

    Quote Originally Posted by Mercury View Post
    We need a tight end,
    repeat, again and again
    ToadofSteel's mantra.

  9. #9
    Veteran EnragedYouth85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Osan AB, S. Korea
    Posts
    2,811
    Quote Originally Posted by Toadofsteel View Post
    This is what I was worried about... Bradshaw can't handle a full workload for very long before his feet break down. Now we're paying for it, because our coaches are too ****ing stupid to use Brown more often...
    Yeah I don't understand why they don't use brown more, but its ultimately the coaches choice. I think they are just being stubborn and trying to stick with what use to work instead of trying to fix the problem at hand. Also, them trying out RB's isn't to replace Bradshaw at #1, it's to fill the depth if Bradshaw goes to IR. Brown, Wilson, New Guy...

    “I never try to be something I'm not,”

    Eli Manning

  10. #10
    Moderator RoanokeFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    95,669
    Quote Originally Posted by EnragedYouth85 View Post
    Yeah I don't understand why they don't use brown more, but its ultimately the coaches choice. I think they are just being stubborn and trying to stick with what use to work instead of trying to fix the problem at hand. Also, them trying out RB's isn't to replace Bradshaw at #1, it's to fill the depth if Bradshaw goes to IR. Brown, Wilson, New Guy...
    They did use Brown more in the last game in which he started
    “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1


+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts