I don't know why I bothered arguing with you again. I usually just laugh at you now. Guess I'm bored.
We're you dropped on your head? Some of those defensive "stops" were because of penalty and saying they WOULDN'T have had a TD there if they don't get the lucky bounce just proves my theory about you.
I just told you why there was no guarantee they would score a TD there. They did in fact stop Washington in the red zone last night holding them to a field goal. This is a fact. As far as the two punts in the first half neither where because of penalties. Again, just a fact.
2 stops were primarily because the Redskins dug a hole for themselves with penalties that they couldn't overcome. Oh....speaking of facts.
The fact that you keep arguing with me after I have already laid the blame for the loss at the feet of the offense is laughable.
Last edited by FBomb; 12-05-2012 at 12:28 AM.
but yeah eli was 8 of 10 on 3rd and forevers that 1rst half. he kept making throws that had gruden going "my goodness". the 2nd half and imo when lockler went down, its as if we knew we had to abandon the pass game or something. eli looked completely diff with lockler and dd...but yeah 2nd half play calling, bs penalties that we never got to see on ST EVERY return on ST and when we hit their 35 (some serious bs imho)...eli looked excellent imho esp when given time and even often when he couldnt. its again, we ask too much of him imho.
whens the last time we had a big play running td? fbomb is right tho, the goal was obviously TOP to limit his possessions. it sure looked like to me washington was running on us at will and the only times we got a stop or the fumble was on a mistake from them, not our d forcing the issue...
i place the loss more on the DE's than anyone else. they did NOTHING and were the POA for washington, and they kept playing scared bc thats what they are thanks to tuck