+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26
  1. #1
    Veteran TroyArcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    4,685

    Giants defensive rankings, not as bad as I thought, but not good

    Stats don't tell the everything but they do tell something:

    25th in the NFL giving up 270 yards per game, not very good, I still compare all Giants Defenses to the 86 Giants, probably unfair
    9th in scoring at 20.8 points per game, better than I thought
    12 in sacks with 31, very disappointing - Osi and Tuck in particular
    2nd in interceptions with 20, Stevie Brown, who would have known
    21st in Rushing defense at 123 per game, I believe TC used the word soft
    27th against the pass, pathetic

    Fewell has a SB ring but the D is not good and under-performing in my opinion.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by TroyArcher View Post
    Stats don't tell the everything but they do tell something:

    25th in the NFL giving up 270 yards per game, not very good, I still compare all Giants Defenses to the 86 Giants, probably unfair
    9th in scoring at 20.8 points per game, better than I thought
    12 in sacks with 31, very disappointing - Osi and Tuck in particular
    2nd in interceptions with 20, Stevie Brown, who would have known
    21st in Rushing defense at 123 per game, I believe TC used the word soft
    27th against the pass, pathetic

    Fewell has a SB ring but the D is not good and under-performing in my opinion.
    We've been fortunate with the turnovers and stops at the right times.... that IS part of a good defense.. however Im not surprised at all about the pass and rush rankings. It's pretty clear when you watch them on the field... and why I'm never at ease with them on the field.
    80

  3. #3
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    9,845
    The only numbers that count are the ones on the score board. There are only 8 teams that have allowed less points and all but one of those teams are all very close to the same number.

  4. #4
    All-Pro Rudyy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Waffles > Pancakes
    Posts
    34,373
    Quote Originally Posted by TroyArcher View Post
    Stats don't tell the everything but they do tell something:25th in the NFL giving up 270 yards per game, not very good, I still compare all Giants Defenses to the 86 Giants, probably unfair9th in scoring at 20.8 points per game, better than I thought12 in sacks with 31, very disappointing - Osi and Tuck in particular2nd in interceptions with 20, Stevie Brown, who would have known21st in Rushing defense at 123 per game, I believe TC used the word soft27th against the pass, patheticFewell has a SB ring but the D is not good and under-performing in my opinion.
    I think underperforming is the correct word.

    Please support.
    Get well soon #80.

  5. #5
    How about second in creating turnovers? Forgot that one?

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by TroyArcher View Post
    Stats don't tell the everything but they do tell something:

    25th in the NFL giving up 270 yards per game, not very good, I still compare all Giants Defenses to the 86 Giants, probably unfair
    9th in scoring at 20.8 points per game, better than I thought
    12 in sacks with 31, very disappointing - Osi and Tuck in particular
    2nd in interceptions with 20, Stevie Brown, who would have known
    21st in Rushing defense at 123 per game, I believe TC used the word soft
    27th against the pass, pathetic

    Fewell has a SB ring but the D is not good and under-performing in my opinion.
    Just to add another stat ... 7th in red zone defense.

    To understand the stats you have to understand PF's defensive scheme. He plays a lot of Nickle and Cover 2. It's a soft defense meant to not give up the big play and capitalize on opponents' mistakes by having players always around the ball.

    By and large he accomplishes this. Poor yards per game given up is due to allowing all the intermediate stuff. Above average red zone defense (7th) limits scoring (also seen in the 9th ranked in points allowed). It also produces a high turnover ratio which we have (currently 6th with +14).

    It's effective ... just not my personal style. I don't like defenses that give up tons of yards and rely on stout red zone stands (seems like putting your back against the wall as a mentality). I also don't like defenses that rely on turnovers since they're never guaranteed (sort of like relying on defensive scoring).

    If our defense tightens up this post season like it did last post season, then I think we'll be fine. If not, it's gonna be a short ride come January (if we make it to that point even).

  7. #7
    Basically we have a bend but don't break D this yr. We give up a ton of yds per game but only giving up an avg of 20 ppg. Do I wish it was 5-6 pts lower, heck yeah, but our O is very prolific & have scored more pts than anyone in the NFC & only NE & Denver have put up more pts than us this yr. We avg 28 ppg.

    Only reason we lost to the Skins is the game plan on Offense stank & the O & ST kept shooting itself in the foot with stupid penalties. I heard people bashing the D but they gave up 10 pts as the RG turd fumble turned into a TD can't really be blamed on them. We should have lit that team up thru the air the entire 2nd half. No way they could have matched us score for score. The Saints couldn't & they have a way more potent O than the Skins do.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Kruunch View Post
    Just to add another stat ... 7th in red zone defense.

    To understand the stats you have to understand PF's defensive scheme. He plays a lot of Nickle and Cover 2. It's a soft defense meant to not give up the big play and capitalize on opponents' mistakes by having players always around the ball.

    By and large he accomplishes this. Poor yards per game given up is due to allowing all the intermediate stuff. Above average red zone defense (7th) limits scoring (also seen in the 9th ranked in points allowed). It also produces a high turnover ratio which we have (currently 6th with +14).

    It's effective ... just not my personal style. I don't like defenses that give up tons of yards and rely on stout red zone stands (seems like putting your back against the wall as a mentality). I also don't like defenses that rely on turnovers since they're never guaranteed (sort of like relying on defensive scoring).

    If our defense tightens up this post season like it did last post season, then I think we'll be fine. If not, it's gonna be a short ride come January (if we make it to that point even).
    7th in the red zone is great, definitely great.

    The problem is with the way they let the ball get moved on them between the 20's, this wears the D out, moreso than when people blame the offense for not giving them the rest. It's the D's job to get their own asses off the field and if they're giving up only 3 or no points on early drives GREAT... but it sometimes means they're doing it giving up 10 play and 12 play drives with more than their share of demoralizing 3rd and 4th down conversions. I dont buy that thats the way they want it to be... getting beat on like that only to solidify (sometimes) at the end. Its happened all year long and by mid 3rd quarter they're wiped. This can catch up to them.
    80

  9. #9
    I think the reason we don't like this bend dont break style is 2 reasons:

    1) It's high-risk/high-reward. Every play could be a huge game changing turnover, or it could be a long completion. Witness Brees' long completion to Colston, followed by Stevie intercepting another long completion attempt on pretty much the same play call the very next play.

    2) Players that don't have the best stamina in the world will get winded playing for such a defense. It depends on the offense sustaining a long drive to give the defense time to rest. If the offense has a three-and-out, the results are devastating.

    3) It's not what Giants fans from any time up until as recent as 2007 would call "GIANTS" brand defense. It's been nearly 30 years since the pass rush has NOT been the primary facet of the defense. It's part of our fabric as part of the Giants nation, and to see it so casually disregarded gives us all (myself included) fits. After all, it was our fierce pass rush that exposed Tom Brady as mere human. By the same notion, PF was able to get it done vs Brady as well, with his own back-end style. I still don't think he really is the man for the job, but there's no arguing that he did help bring us a super bowl victory.

  10. #10
    Veteran TroyArcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    4,685
    Quote Originally Posted by PRGiant View Post
    How about second in creating turnovers? Forgot that one?
    I posted 2nd in Ints?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts