+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30
  1. #1
    Starter Mr.TRUEBLUE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    YANKEELAND, NY
    Posts
    329

    Niners are screwing us! ..Instead of simply releasing Jacobs they put him on suspend

    Niners are screwing us! ..Instead of simply releasing Jacobs they suspend him knowing full well we could've used him down the stretch ..I mean why not? isn't like they are? .. Even if we get healthy Jacobs could be still used as a decoy and blocking back to spell Hynoski ....
    Last edited by Mr.TRUEBLUE; 12-16-2012 at 07:30 AM.

  2. #2
    Since we're past the trading deadline and Jacobs is a vested player, he would need to be waived in which there are several teams that have their chance at Jacobs before the Giants.

  3. #3
    Starter Mr.TRUEBLUE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    YANKEELAND, NY
    Posts
    329
    If they released him BJac would MOST DEF choose N.Y. Even to be used as a blocking back at this point who may get only 3 or 4 looks all game. Still better than how he was used by Harbaugh

  4. #4
    Moderator RoanokeFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    100,461
    We don't have any idea whether the team would invite him back. The 49ers are screwing Jacobs, not the Giants
    “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1








    # 80

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.TRUEBLUE View Post
    If they released him BJac would MOST DEF choose N.Y. Even to be used as a blocking back at this point who may get only 3 or 4 looks all game. Still better than how he was used by Harbaugh
    Again, he has no say as being released is different than being waived. He would have to clear the waiver wire. Only then is he free to negotiate with any team he wishes. And saying he would "MOST DEFINITELY" choose NY is still speculation.

  6. #6
    Moderator RoanokeFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    100,461
    Quote Originally Posted by penguinfarmer View Post
    Again, he has no say as being released is different than being waived. He would have to clear the waiver wire. Only then is he free to negotiate with any team he wishes. And saying he would "MOST DEFINITELY" choose NY is still speculation.
    Any team with a worser ecord than the Giants could claim him
    Last edited by RoanokeFan; 12-16-2012 at 11:06 AM.
    “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1








    # 80

  7. #7
    Administrator Die-Hard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2,829
    Quote Originally Posted by penguinfarmer View Post
    Again, he has no say as being released is different than being waived. He would have to clear the waiver wire. Only then is he free to negotiate with any team he wishes. And saying he would "MOST DEFINITELY" choose NY is still speculation.
    He said point blank that the only team he wants to play for is the Giants

  8. #8
    Where and when?

  9. #9
    stop with this nonsense already.
    we let him go for the same reason they weren't using him out there.
    why would we want to waste a roster spot.
    he is not even close to being his former self.
    you BJ homers need to let it go.
    when the aliens finally come to conquer us ....
    i hope that their weapons of choice are Gibsons and Fenders

  10. #10
    Niners don't want to face an angry Jacobs in the playoffs. Neither would I.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts