+ Reply to Thread

Thread: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

  1. #135751
    Hall of Famer MattMeyerBud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    60,564

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

    NEW VOTE

    2 WR FLEX: Lawl, Pappy

    3 WR FLEX: Me, Daven, Amanda

    (just called her and asked and she said its ludacris to be forced to only start 2 WRs. EVerybody will have stacked WRs)

    smart girl
    Fear the name, appreciate the game

  2. #135752
    All-Pro Morehead State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Westfield, MA
    Posts
    44,809

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

    [quote user="byron"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="Morehead State"]Flex: Kase, Lawl, Pats, Morehead, Scrappy, Sharick.................. No flex: MMB. Blondie, Byron, Pizzey, Lando................. Waiting for LT. ................6-5 Flex right now.[/quote]

    then it's 6/6 because I remember matt saying he got a text from LT saying no flex.
    [/quote]

    and mind u if that was the case we give Commish the 1.5 votes for even tiebreakers.
    [/quote] so its not flex[/quote]
    Its flex. The question now is 3 WR plus flex or 2 WR plus flex. This is a riot, I only voted flex because I didn't want 3 WR. I would have voted no flex if I thought we could still do 3 WR.
    Get well soon 80.

  3. #135753
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    15,649

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

    [quote user="MattMeyerBud"]


    I highly disagree on that, I think WRs are too stacked to only have a mandatory two receivers.

    So that means u just go RB heavy and then u can still get a WR like Reggie Wayne or STevie Johnson as your WR2...

    no stratagy, no skill, it kills the game. FORCE people to have to account for 3 WRs and the RB power won't exist
    [/quote]

    There is no REASON to go RB heavy Matt, WR's and RB's are interchangeable neither gives you significantly more Fantasy points anymore, RB's used to, but not anymore...and your "Wr's are deeper" argument doesn't come into effect unless we have like 20+ teams....people are going to have their starting lineup finished before you have to worry about the depth on WR or RB running out and having to use a **** player.

  4. #135754
    Hall of Famer MattMeyerBud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    60,564

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

    [quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="byron"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="Morehead State"]Flex: Kase, Lawl, Pats, Morehead, Scrappy, Sharick.................. No flex: MMB. Blondie, Byron, Pizzey, Lando................. Waiting for LT. ................6-5 Flex right now.[/quote]

    then it's 6/6 because I remember matt saying he got a text from LT saying no flex.
    [/quote]

    and mind u if that was the case we give Commish the 1.5 votes for even tiebreakers.
    [/quote] so its not flex[/quote]
    Its flex. The question now is 3 WR plus flex or 2 WR plus flex. This is a riot, I only voted flex because I didn't want 3 WR. I would have voted no flex if I thought we could still do 3 WR.[/quote]

    whats the difference? Nothing should change by your theory. U just take a stab at WRs since its luck and play for RBs if it lands
    Fear the name, appreciate the game

  5. #135755
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Right Here
    Posts
    6,848

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD



    [quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="byron"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="Morehead State"]Flex: Kase, Lawl, Pats, Morehead, Scrappy, Sharick.................. No flex: MMB. Blondie, Byron, Pizzey, Lando................. Waiting for LT. ................6-5 Flex right now.[/quote]

    then it's 6/6 because I remember matt saying he got a text from LT saying no flex.
    [/quote]

    and mind u if that was the case we give Commish the 1.5 votes for even tiebreakers.
    [/quote] so its not flex[/quote] Its flex. The question now is 3 WR plus flex or 2 WR plus flex. This is a riot, I only voted flex because I didn't want 3 WR. I would have voted no flex if I thought we could still do 3 WR.[/quote]never filpflop man!!</P>


    </P>

  6. #135756
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    15,649

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

    [quote user="MattMeyerBud"]NEW VOTE

    2 WR FLEX: Lawl, Pappy

    3 WR FLEX: Me, Daven, Amanda

    (just called her and asked and she said its ludacris to be forced to only start 2 WRs. EVerybody will have stacked WRs)

    smart girl
    [/quote]

    you should say clever girl instead of smart girl, and neither is really true in this situation, you've just trained her...and that's terrible lol.

  7. #135757
    Hall of Famer MattMeyerBud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    60,564

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

    [quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]


    I highly disagree on that, I think WRs are too stacked to only have a mandatory two receivers.

    So that means u just go RB heavy and then u can still get a WR like Reggie Wayne or STevie Johnson as your WR2...

    no stratagy, no skill, it kills the game. FORCE people to have to account for 3 WRs and the RB power won't exist
    [/quote]

    There is no REASON to go RB heavy Matt, WR's and RB's are interchangeable neither gives you significantly more Fantasy points anymore, RB's used to, but not anymore...and your "Wr's are deeper" argument doesn't come into effect unless we have like 20+ teams....people are going to have their starting lineup finished before you have to worry about the depth on WR or RB running out and having to use a **** player.
    [/quote]

    when you have WR3s out there like Reggie WAyne and STevie Johnson caliber that u could easily put in at WR2, u don't have to worry baout RB.. make sure u get the pick of the litter at RB and let WR go to the back burner. Its what most would do. ESPECIALLY in a year where RB talent is not deep
    Fear the name, appreciate the game

  8. #135758
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    15,649

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

    [quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="byron"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="Morehead State"]Flex: Kase, Lawl, Pats, Morehead, Scrappy, Sharick.................. No flex: MMB. Blondie, Byron, Pizzey, Lando................. Waiting for LT. ................6-5 Flex right now.[/quote]

    then it's 6/6 because I remember matt saying he got a text from LT saying no flex.
    [/quote]

    and mind u if that was the case we give Commish the 1.5 votes for even tiebreakers.
    [/quote] so its not flex[/quote]
    Its flex. The question now is 3 WR plus flex or 2 WR plus flex. This is a riot, I only voted flex because I didn't want 3 WR. I would have voted no flex if I thought we could still do 3 WR.[/quote]

    don't worry, it's not gonna pass anyhow.

  9. #135759
    Hall of Famer MattMeyerBud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    60,564

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

    Pappy, make your selection on the initial vote with the knowledge that we're going to put the compromise up to vote.

    REgardless my vote will stay the same and I will vote for WR3 Flex
    Fear the name, appreciate the game

  10. #135760

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

    It's been a while since I have posted up in this joint. Barely been on at all since I got promoted to Zone Supervisor. I see what's going on and I am going to vote for 3 WR flex. Looking forward to getting back what's rightfully mine (FF Championship Belt and the beer money)
    Close or you hit the bricks

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts