I never said cheap shots were okay, I just take issue with what is considered a cheap shot nowadays. In any time, just blatantly diving at somebody's knee was always a dirty move. A one in a billion chance that it might of changed the outcome is a garbage answer. How do YOU make the arguments for player safety and then say this bull**** sore loser move is acceptable?
Answer is: you don't. And I applaud your Trolling today good sir
I'm not talking about "cheap shots". I'm talking about trying to knock the QB down before he has a chance to take a knee with the hope of dislodging the football. And/or forcing him to rush the play and possibly bobbling the snap.
That just seems like good football.
I guess you're happy when we stand around and watch Romo take 3 knees unchallenged, dispite his history of fumble snaps under pressure.
reverbnation.com/yummytheunderdog
I just had a really funny debate with a friend of mine. lol
She said she just read an article about how there is less than 15 mins of actual action in football. and how "man and ppl say baseball is bad".
So I said, let me use math to show you how ****ing boring baseball is.
IF you consider "Action" the following:
-the release of a pitch, all the way to hitting a catcher's glove (not even a full second)
-pickoff moves/throwovers
-watching a fielder wait for a popped up ball fall to their location
Then baseball is JUST BARELY 15 minutes of action.
And that's with me being generous to how many actual hits there are per game, and how many pitches are thrown by each team.
Internet Celebrity