THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

[DavenIII]

[quote user="MattMeyerBud"]lol u said ur not even in the league[/quote]

Matt's losing it, he's voting for Blondie telling everyone that if they vote flex they are bad players...and now...now he's kicking people out of the league for voting flex...

calm yourself matt...it'll be ok

:P J/k

[bigblue4417]

[quote user="bandwgn86"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="bandwgn86"]If you had to pick between Marshal Faulk or LdT who would you pick as your RB.
I think I go with MF[/quote]

i dunno man

thats a hard one but i think i have to go with LdT. In his prime we were talking about him being the greatest of all time

Faulk's receiving was great, but I think it got inflated because of MArtz's offense
[/quote]it is very tough choice.. LdT was a TD machine..[/quote]
The past 10 years have seen some extraordinary seasons from running
backs, with Marshall Faulk who set the record for fantasy points in a season by a
non-QB, with 374.9 in 2000. Faulk did that in just fourteen games, for
an astounding 26.8 FP/G., Priest Holmes and Shaun Alexander setting a
variety of records for yards and touchdowns. Still, Tomlinson's 2006
campaign was a clear cut above the rest. In rushing for 1,815 yards and
28 touchdowns, LT essentially matched Alexander's numbers from a year
earlier. The key difference was that Tomlinson added 508 yards and three
touchdowns as a receiver. His 2,323 total yards are within sniffing
distance of Faulk's best campaign. He scored three or more touchdowns in
a game six times and tallied at least 100 yards of total offense in 15
of 16 games.

[Kase-1]

[quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="Kase-1"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="bigblue4417"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="bigblue4417"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]u starting with that flex bs again. U said u finally saw the folly of your ways
[/quote]
I said I understood where you were coming from. It would make the draft more challenging and would change the overall dynamic of the league. I still said I preferred Flex. I like to have the option of playing a WR or a RB instead of having to play 3 WRs and 2 RBs.
[/quote]

the weaker players tend to do that
[/quote]
LOL Good thing "The Champ" doesn't fit in that category...

4 losses in 2 years but keep hatin Mr. 500
[/quote]

real leagues real money - u'll get a taste of it if u respond to my email

flex leagues are crutches
[/quote]LMAO, you're trying so hard
[/quote]

i really despise flex leagues

i wouldn't mind having the 3rd WR spot being TE capable, but going etiher WR and RB is ******ed to me
[/quote]And your reasoning behind this is....

[lawl]

Flex

[bandwgn86]

[quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="bandwgn86"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="bandwgn86"][quote user="bigblue4417"]Shock is on the record as flex. 99% sure...
[/quote]Flex for me[/quote]

lol u said ur not even in the league
[/quote]thats a good point[/quote]

u said u'd fill in if we needed though right?
[/quote]yes sir

[MattMeyerBud]

[quote user="Kase-1"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="Kase-1"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="bigblue4417"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="bigblue4417"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]u starting with that flex bs again. U said u finally saw the folly of your ways
[/quote]
I said I understood where you were coming from. It would make the draft more challenging and would change the overall dynamic of the league. I still said I preferred Flex. I like to have the option of playing a WR or a RB instead of having to play 3 WRs and 2 RBs.
[/quote]

the weaker players tend to do that
[/quote]
LOL Good thing "The Champ" doesn't fit in that category...

4 losses in 2 years but keep hatin Mr. 500
[/quote]

real leagues real money - u'll get a taste of it if u respond to my email

flex leagues are crutches
[/quote]LMAO, you're trying so hard
[/quote]

i really despise flex leagues

i wouldn't mind having the 3rd WR spot being TE capable, but going etiher WR and RB is ******ed to me
[/quote]And your reasoning behind this is....
[/quote]

because u should be required to start 3 WRs at all times because theres so many of them. Pretty much everybody has stud WRs and everybody goes for 3 RBs. It weakens the WR class

It makes for a predictable draft and favors anybody in the first 4 picks. By going standard it changes the draft and makes things more competitive. Different stratagies could and do exist within those draft, oppose to just taking the first 3 RBs you see

[bigblue4417]

[quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="bigblue4417"]Shock is on the record as flex. 99% sure...
[/quote]

we're going to need his vote fun boy

[/quote]
<font color="#FF0000">Just like we needed Blondies right? </font>

[MattMeyerBud]

[quote user="lawl"]Flex[/quote]

sorry rook, u haven't earned voting rights yet...

looks like its comin down to big b lol

[MattMeyerBud]

[quote user="bigblue4417"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="bigblue4417"]Shock is on the record as flex. 99% sure...
[/quote]

we're going to need his vote fun boy

[/quote]
<font color="#ff0000">Just like we needed Blondies right? </font>
[/quote]

lol text her

[bandwgn86]

[quote user="bigblue4417"][quote user="bandwgn86"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="bandwgn86"]If you had to pick between Marshal Faulk or LdT who would you pick as your RB.
I think I go with MF[/quote]

i dunno man

thats a hard one but i think i have to go with LdT. In his prime we were talking about him being the greatest of all time

Faulk's receiving was great, but I think it got inflated because of MArtz's offense
[/quote]it is very tough choice.. LdT was a TD machine..[/quote]
The past 10 years have seen some extraordinary seasons from running
backs, with Marshall Faulk who set the record for fantasy points in a season by a
non-QB, with 374.9 in 2000. Faulk did that in just fourteen games, for
an astounding 26.8 FP/G., Priest Holmes and Shaun Alexander setting a
variety of records for yards and touchdowns. Still, Tomlinson's 2006
campaign was a clear cut above the rest. In rushing for 1,815 yards and
28 touchdowns, LT essentially matched Alexander's numbers from a year
earlier. The key difference was that Tomlinson added 508 yards and three
touchdowns as a receiver. His 2,323 total yards are within sniffing
distance of Faulk's best campaign. He scored three or more touchdowns in
a game six times and tallied at least 100 yards of total offense in 15
of 16 games.

[/quote]LT?!? boooooooo