[quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="JPizzack"]
Not to amp up for disappointment or anything but....
Philly gave up FOUR....4 ****ing passing TDs last week!
Where's this stud secondary?
Our run game + their ****ty d-line.....</p>
our passing game just needs to show up to work, and this isn't an unreasonable expectation.
our pass rush needs to be A+ though for this to work.</p>
[/quote]
not for nothing, Ryan threw for under 200 yqards. It was just goalline stuff.
[/quote]</p>
You love those passing yardage totals. </p>
As is almost always the case, last week QB's who threw for more than 300 yards had a losing record.</p>[/quote]
<u>well when your speaking on how a secondary played pass defense specifically, i thin kpassing yardage is a viable point to make.</u> The 4 TDs were basically all off of defensive turnovers and rushing the ball down their throats. The passing game really never got going. ITs not more of a mistake to try and use throwing TDs vs throwing yards to make this point
[/quote]especially when the likes of rex grossman and bradford are putting up over 300 yards, teams we would usually crush.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 117,341 to 117,350 of 145748
Thread: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD
-
09-22-2011 09:54 AM #117341
Re: THEE SWAG THREAD
-
09-22-2011 09:56 AM #117342All-Pro
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Westfield, MA
- Posts
- 32,575
Re: THEE SWAG THREAD
[quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="JPizzack"]
Not to amp up for disappointment or anything but....
Philly gave up FOUR....4 ****ing passing TDs last week!
Where's this stud secondary?
Our run game + their ****ty d-line.....</P>
our passing game just needs to show up to work, and this isn't an unreasonable expectation.
our pass rush needs to be A+ though for this to work.</P>
[/quote]
not for nothing, Ryan threw for under 200 yqards. It was just goalline stuff.
[/quote]</P>
You love those passing yardage totals. </P>
As is almost always the case, last week QB's who threw for more than 300 yards had a losing record.</P>
[/quote]
well when your speaking on how a secondary played pass defense specifically, i thin kpassing yardage is a viable point to make. The 4 TDs were basically all off of defensive turnovers and rushing the ball down their throats. The passing game really never got going. ITs not more of a mistake to try and use throwing TDs vs throwing yards to make this point
[/quote]</P>
Didn't he engineer 2, 80 yard drives in crunch time?</P>
You used to be impressed with Eli when he used to do that, despite his passing totals. </P>reverbnation.com/yummytheunderdog
-
09-22-2011 09:59 AM #117343
Re: THEE SWAG THREAD
[quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="JPizzack"]
Not to amp up for disappointment or anything but....
Philly gave up FOUR....4 ****ing passing TDs last week!
Where's this stud secondary?
Our run game + their ****ty d-line.....</p>
our passing game just needs to show up to work, and this isn't an unreasonable expectation.
our pass rush needs to be A+ though for this to work.</p>
[/quote]
not for nothing, Ryan threw for under 200 yqards. It was just goalline stuff.
[/quote]</p>
You love those passing yardage totals. </p>
As is almost always the case, last week QB's who threw for more than 300 yards had a losing record.</p>
[/quote]
well when your speaking on how a secondary played pass defense specifically, i thin kpassing yardage is a viable point to make. The 4 TDs were basically all off of defensive turnovers and rushing the ball down their throats. The passing game really never got going. ITs not more of a mistake to try and use throwing TDs vs throwing yards to make this point
[/quote]</p>
Didn't he engineer 2, 80 yard drives in crunch time?</p>
<u>You used to be impressed with Eli when he used to do that, despite his passing totals. </u></p>[/quote]yea i think he did that at the end of the 2nd quarter last week troll. 7 for 7 with a +20 yard td
-
09-22-2011 10:01 AM #117344Hall of Famer
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 60,001
Re: THEE SWAG THREAD
[quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="JPizzack"]
Not to amp up for disappointment or anything but....
Philly gave up FOUR....4 ****ing passing TDs last week!
Where's this stud secondary?
Our run game + their ****ty d-line.....</p>
our passing game just needs to show up to work, and this isn't an unreasonable expectation.
our pass rush needs to be A+ though for this to work.</p>
[/quote]
not for nothing, Ryan threw for under 200 yqards. It was just goalline stuff.
[/quote]</p>
You love those passing yardage totals. </p>
As is almost always the case, last week QB's who threw for more than 300 yards had a losing record.</p>
[/quote]
well when your speaking on how a secondary played pass defense specifically, i thin kpassing yardage is a viable point to make. The 4 TDs were basically all off of defensive turnovers and rushing the ball down their throats. The passing game really never got going. ITs not more of a mistake to try and use throwing TDs vs throwing yards to make this point
[/quote]</p>
Didn't he engineer 2, 80 yard drives in crunch time?</p>
You used to be impressed with Eli when he used to do that, despite his passing totals. </p>[/quote]
starting to troll already?
Alllllrighty
again, this is not a debate about Ryans play. We are talking about how productive the EAgles secondary was. But Yes Ryan did put together that one nice drive. Im pretty sure the other one had more to do with the 61 yard run on first down after the penalty on Turner. Ryan threw for 13 yards on that lead taking drive
Morehead Prediction
AL East
1. Red Sox
2. Orioles
3. Tampa
4. Jays
5. Yankees
BOOK IT!!!!!!
-
09-22-2011 10:01 AM #117345All-Pro
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Westfield, MA
- Posts
- 32,575
Re: THEE SWAG THREAD
[quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="JPizzack"]
Not to amp up for disappointment or anything but....
Philly gave up FOUR....4 ****ing passing TDs last week!
Where's this stud secondary?
Our run game + their ****ty d-line.....</P>
our passing game just needs to show up to work, and this isn't an unreasonable expectation.
our pass rush needs to be A+ though for this to work.</P>
[/quote]
not for nothing, Ryan threw for under 200 yqards. It was just goalline stuff.
[/quote]</P>
You love those passing yardage totals. </P>
As is almost always the case, last week QB's who threw for more than 300 yards had a losing record.</P>
[/quote]
well when your speaking on how a secondary played pass defense specifically, i thin kpassing yardage is a viable point to make. The 4 TDs were basically all off of defensive turnovers and rushing the ball down their throats. The passing game really never got going. ITs not more of a mistake to try and use throwing TDs vs throwing yards to make this point
[/quote]</P>
Didn't he engineer 2, 80 yard drives in crunch time?</P>
<U>You used to be impressed with Eli when he used to do that, despite his passing totals. </U></P>
[/quote]yea i think he did that at the end of the 2nd quarter last week troll. 7 for 7 with a +20 yard td
[/quote]</P>
Evidentally Matt is not impressed with that anymore.</P>
And stick that "troll" garbage up your *** you little ****.</P>reverbnation.com/yummytheunderdog
-
09-22-2011 10:02 AM #117346Hall of Famer
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 60,001
Re: THEE SWAG THREAD
[quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="JPizzack"]
Not to amp up for disappointment or anything but....
Philly gave up FOUR....4 ****ing passing TDs last week!
Where's this stud secondary?
Our run game + their ****ty d-line.....</p>
our passing game just needs to show up to work, and this isn't an unreasonable expectation.
our pass rush needs to be A+ though for this to work.</p>
[/quote]
not for nothing, Ryan threw for under 200 yqards. It was just goalline stuff.
[/quote]</p>
You love those passing yardage totals. </p>
As is almost always the case, last week QB's who threw for more than 300 yards had a losing record.</p>
[/quote]
well when your speaking on how a secondary played pass defense specifically, i thin kpassing yardage is a viable point to make. The 4 TDs were basically all off of defensive turnovers and rushing the ball down their throats. The passing game really never got going. ITs not more of a mistake to try and use throwing TDs vs throwing yards to make this point
[/quote]</p>
Didn't he engineer 2, 80 yard drives in crunch time?</p>
<u>You used to be impressed with Eli when he used to do that, despite his passing totals. </u></p>[/quote]yea i think he did that at the end of the 2nd quarter last week troll. 7 for 7 with a +20 yard td
[/quote]
he really has turned into one. Arguments or not... i really don't want to hear him feel insulted when hes called that anymore with the fact that he just trolls EVERY single debate in here even when it has nothing to do wtih the giants even.
Morehead Prediction
AL East
1. Red Sox
2. Orioles
3. Tampa
4. Jays
5. Yankees
BOOK IT!!!!!!
-
09-22-2011 10:03 AM #117347
Re: THEE SWAG THREAD
[quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="JPizzack"]
Not to amp up for disappointment or anything but....
Philly gave up FOUR....4 ****ing passing TDs last week!
Where's this stud secondary?
Our run game + their ****ty d-line.....</p>
our passing game just needs to show up to work, and this isn't an unreasonable expectation.
our pass rush needs to be A+ though for this to work.</p>
[/quote]
not for nothing, Ryan threw for under 200 yqards. It was just goalline stuff.
[/quote]</p>
You love those passing yardage totals. </p>
As is almost always the case, last week QB's who threw for more than 300 yards had a losing record.</p>
[/quote]
well when your speaking on how a secondary played pass defense specifically, i thin kpassing yardage is a viable point to make. The 4 TDs were basically all off of defensive turnovers and rushing the ball down their throats. The passing game really never got going. ITs not more of a mistake to try and use throwing TDs vs throwing yards to make this point
[/quote]</p>
Didn't he engineer 2, 80 yard drives in crunch time?</p>
<u>You used to be impressed with Eli when he used to do that, despite his passing totals. </u></p>
[/quote]yea i think he did that at the end of the 2nd quarter last week troll. 7 for 7 with a +20 yard td
[/quote]</p>
Evidentally Matt is not impressed with that anymore.</p>
And stick that "troll" garbage up your *** you little ****.</p>[/quote][
]
-
09-22-2011 10:04 AM #117348
Re: THEE SWAG THREAD
</P>
Add 2011 to that list. </P>
Giants fan since the early 80s
-
09-22-2011 10:04 AM #117349Hall of Famer
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 60,001
Re: THEE SWAG THREAD
[quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="JPizzack"]
Not to amp up for disappointment or anything but....
Philly gave up FOUR....4 ****ing passing TDs last week!
Where's this stud secondary?
Our run game + their ****ty d-line.....</p>
our passing game just needs to show up to work, and this isn't an unreasonable expectation.
our pass rush needs to be A+ though for this to work.</p>
[/quote]
not for nothing, Ryan threw for under 200 yqards. It was just goalline stuff.
[/quote]</p>
You love those passing yardage totals. </p>
As is almost always the case, last week QB's who threw for more than 300 yards had a losing record.</p>
[/quote]
well when your speaking on how a secondary played pass defense specifically, i thin kpassing yardage is a viable point to make. The 4 TDs were basically all off of defensive turnovers and rushing the ball down their throats. The passing game really never got going. ITs not more of a mistake to try and use throwing TDs vs throwing yards to make this point
[/quote]</p>
Didn't he engineer 2, 80 yard drives in crunch time?</p>
<u>You used to be impressed with Eli when he used to do that, despite his passing totals. </u></p>
[/quote]yea i think he did that at the end of the 2nd quarter last week troll. 7 for 7 with a +20 yard td
[/quote]</p>
Evidentally Matt is not impressed with that anymore.</p>
And stick that "troll" garbage up your *** you little ****.</p>[/quote]
get annoying and feel insulted all you want
when your fixated on trying to make EVERYTHING about Eli, its annoying.
Infact we weren't even TALKING about QBs really, we were talking about the performance of Eagles secondary. All of a sudden it turns into Matt Ryan vs Eli. YOu are defining troll, whether you want to admit it or not. Stop crying your insulted when its all you've been doing and getting progressively worse
Morehead Prediction
AL East
1. Red Sox
2. Orioles
3. Tampa
4. Jays
5. Yankees
BOOK IT!!!!!!
-
09-22-2011 10:05 AM #117350All-Pro
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Westfield, MA
- Posts
- 32,575
Re: THEE SWAG THREAD
[quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="JPizzack"]
Not to amp up for disappointment or anything but....
Philly gave up FOUR....4 ****ing passing TDs last week!
Where's this stud secondary?
Our run game + their ****ty d-line.....</P>
our passing game just needs to show up to work, and this isn't an unreasonable expectation.
our pass rush needs to be A+ though for this to work.</P>
[/quote]
not for nothing, Ryan threw for under 200 yqards. It was just goalline stuff.
[/quote]</P>
You love those passing yardage totals. </P>
As is almost always the case, last week QB's who threw for more than 300 yards had a losing record.</P>
[/quote]
well when your speaking on how a secondary played pass defense specifically, i thin kpassing yardage is a viable point to make. The 4 TDs were basically all off of defensive turnovers and rushing the ball down their throats. The passing game really never got going. ITs not more of a mistake to try and use throwing TDs vs throwing yards to make this point
[/quote]</P>
Didn't he engineer 2, 80 yard drives in crunch time?</P>
<U>You used to be impressed with Eli when he used to do that, despite his passing totals. </U></P>
[/quote]yea i think he did that at the end of the 2nd quarter last week troll. 7 for 7 with a +20 yard td
[/quote]
he really has turned into one. Arguments or not... i really don't want to hear him feel insulted when hes called that anymore with the fact that he just trolls EVERY single debate in here even when it has nothing to do wtih the giants even.
[/quote]</P>
Pointing out your hipocrosy isn't trolling at all. The kid drove his team twice, 80 yards each and won the game. Thats a great performance. </P>
So now if I disagree with Matt, I am a troll. This is an interesting standard.</P>reverbnation.com/yummytheunderdog
Reply With Quote
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts