THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

[MattMeyerBud]

[quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]the closest Jacobs would come is in the 40.. he won't maintain the speed for the 100 or have a quick enough burst out the gate for the 20[/quote]

Dude...it doesn't matter when it comes to the actual game, football speed is different then 40 times and shuttle tests and that crap, but when it comes to those tests Bradshaw just isn't fast man....that's not what he is...he's agile not fast.

he was 4.55 on his 40, Jacobs was 4.56.....1 thousandth of a second...and Bradshaw obviously got off the starting line faster...takes less for him to get started....so Jacobs "caught up" by 40 yards...it's common sense he will continue to gain speed on Bradshaw as the race goes on...

yes to a point....maybe Jacobs has less endurance...who knows...the point is that over 100 yards neither of them is going to run out of steam...the are Running Backs a 100 yard sprint is nothing to them.
[/quote]

this is where debating with Daven is annoying. He just makes things up .

WHat does his first paragraph have to do with anything i said?

The second paragraph essentially proves everything I said except that the difference is that he thinks Jacobs would be able to maintain that speed. I completely disagree.

[lttaylor56]

[quote user="JPizzack"]

[quote user="lttaylor56"][quote user="JPizzack"]MUAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! I CAUSED IT AGAIN!!!!![/quote]Remember that time JP brought the debate back to life? hahaha
[/quote]</p>


I feel like I do this once a year lol</p>[/quote]That's awesome. Lately every time I post in tagf--some testosterone lacking mod has an issue with one of my pics. ****!

[lttaylor56]

[quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]the closest Jacobs would come is in the 40.. he won't maintain the speed for the 100 or have a quick enough burst out the gate for the 20[/quote]

Dude...it doesn't matter when it comes to the actual game, football speed is different then 40 times and shuttle tests and that crap, but when it comes to those tests Bradshaw just isn't fast man....that's not what he is...he's agile not fast.

he was 4.55 on his 40, Jacobs was 4.56.....1 thousandth of a second...and Bradshaw obviously got off the starting line faster...takes less for him to get started....so Jacobs "caught up" by 40 yards...it's common sense he will continue to gain speed on Bradshaw as the race goes on...

yes to a point....maybe Jacobs has less endurance...who knows...the point is that over 100 yards neither of them is going to run out of steam...the are Running Backs a 100 yard sprint is nothing to them.
[/quote]

this is where debating with Daven is annoying. He just makes things up .

WHat does his first paragraph have to do with anything i said?

The second paragraph essentially proves everything I said except that the difference is that he thinks Jacobs would be able to maintain that speed. I completely disagree.
[/quote]Daven should be a Lawyer, not a scientist.

[bigblue4417]

[quote user="ny06"]

If the Giants lose to the Bills I blame you all...</p>


And this is what will happen to the Thee Thread </p>


</p>[/quote]
The Giants are 2-0 in Thee Thread Games.

[JPizzack]

[quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="JPizzack"]


[quote user="MattMeyerBud"][/quote]</P>


Does your avatar text refer to the Gmen Bandwagon? hahaha</P>


[/quote]
goddamn right it does
[/quote]</P>


+1</P>

[ny06]

[quote user="bigblue4417"][quote user="ny06"]


If the Giants lose to the Bills I blame you all...</P>


And this is what will happen to the Thee Thread </P>


</P>


[/quote]
The Giants are 2-0 in Thee Thread Games.
[/quote]</P>


That's refreshing. </P>


Make it 3-0</P>

[JPizzack]

[quote user="bigblue4417"][quote user="ny06"]


If the Giants lose to the Bills I blame you all...</P>


And this is what will happen to the Thee Thread </P>


</P>


[/quote]
The Giants are 2-0 in Thee Thread Games.
[/quote]</P>


not to jinx it, but the Giants have won every game I ever went to lol</P>

[bigblue4417]

[quote user="JPizzack"][quote user="bigblue4417"][quote user="ny06"]


If the Giants lose to the Bills I blame you all...</p>


And this is what will happen to the Thee Thread </p>


</p>


[/quote]
The Giants are 2-0 in Thee Thread Games.
[/quote]</p>


<font color="#0000FF">not to jinx it</font>, but the Giants have won every game I ever went to lol</p>[/quote]
Uh Oh Ny06. Now there is time for concern...

[lttaylor56]

[quote user="bigblue4417"][quote user="ny06"]

If the Giants lose to the Bills I blame you all...</p>


And this is what will happen to the Thee Thread </p>


</p>[/quote]
The Giants are 2-0 in Thee Thread Games.
[/quote]If we win this one, it's got all the makings to be a really great game. I would prefer bills to be 5/0 coming in to us and we hand them their first loss and take their QB out of the game.

[Morehead State]

Well my drunken rage from last night is in the past. No more drunken texts to Matt.</P>


BUT, the Yankees are a disgrace. I was watching the games with a Yankee fan and he was embarrassed for not bringing in Mo in the 9th.</P>


The Sox blew the game without a doubt. And we probably would have gotten beat today, but the Yanks have disgraced themselves and all of baseball.</P>


The Phillies played it straight for 13 innings. And for the entire series with Atlanta. Just like the Giants did in 07 against the Pats. And we applauded our team for doing that.</P>


You can spin it anyway you want, but your team is bush.</P>