THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

[lttaylor56]

[quote user="JPizzack"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="JPizzack"]


[quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]the offense for giving the ball to SF on the 17 and then special teams for not staying true to their responsibilities on kick return and giving SF the ball on the 50
[/quote]

If I have to place blame on a particular player/set of players it's on Manningham.

you can't stop like that, he reverted to last year...that **** was happening constantly last year.
[/quote]</p>


I have to wonder....
Is Manningham good, or does Eli just make him look good when they connect?!</p>


[/quote]

we'll know this offseason what the giants think. Mario is a FA.

Personally I think hes gone and Smith's back.
[/quote]</p>


Sucks to think about....I mean he still IS a good option...but, maybe.
If so, I think I was right about what receivers we would keep. haha....except Smith messed the whole thing up when he ditched us.</p>[/quote]....and the dumbass left me with a Jersey to stare at and not know wtf to do with.

[MattMeyerBud]

[quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="dezzzR"]matts trolling, without a doubt. i know he hates fewell.
[/quote]

im being realistic...

the defense by far and away was on the blame game for 18 of those points:

BUT that does not mean its on Fewell.

- 3 FGs - all on the defense
- giving up the TD to V.Davis, on the defense. BUT it was also because a backup played missed an assignemtn. Fewell can't go play for them
- 2 point conversion

The defense is no more to blame than the offense. Scoring only 20 points and setting their offense up for the game winning TD is just as much if not more of the issue from yesterdays game. Settled for 2 FGs in the red zone, is a problem
[/quote]im not putting it ALL on fewell, but its a constant trend with this guy. he cant get our defense off the field. we cant rely on our defense and with the names we have its pretty pathetic imo. even with injuries!, theres not one person in that secondary that was higher than a 2nd round pick. its pathetic!
[/quote]

we can't get out defense off the field because we gave up an onside pick and the offense had two turnovers. We finally played alot of man like u've wanted, our players get beat and ur still trying to act like it was Fewell.

Our defenes gave up 300 yards yesterday which was the lowest they've given up on the season. There was nothing trending about our defense yesterday.
[/quote] get over the onside kick please. the giants gave up 27 points. end of story
[/quote]

thank you for again proving that use no logic, u just get ur **** hard on attempting to **** talk fewell and put blame on him. So far every idea you've thought of has been blah

is it cause hes black?

[dezzzR]

anyone watch the marquez pacman fight? it was a close one. something about marquez style makes it a hard fight for pacman. pacman floyd next finally?? saw a bunch of shirt in the crowd that said

"Run Floyd". haha i want one.

[MattMeyerBud]

[quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]the offense for giving the ball to SF on the 17 and then special teams for not staying true to their responsibilities on kick return and giving SF the ball on the 50
[/quote]

If I have to place blame on a particular player/set of players it's on Manningham.

you can't stop like that, he reverted to last year...that **** was happening constantly last year.
[/quote]

well I agree...

but still Dezz is on an anti-fewell rant and has tried so far saying that:

-it was completely the defenses fault
-fewells scheme
-9ers aren't that good, they play in weak division

hes just on his anti-fewell thing and trying to apply it to the loss. <u>Im not a fewell fan but alot of completed balls yesterday were in man coverages,</u> aka our guys getting beat.

Not that it even happened THAT much. Regardless the defense was on the hook for about 10 points that should of never even happened.

While I do consider it a team loss, if I HAD to put blame it would be on the offense side of things
[/quote]uhhh no there wasnt. there were a few. look what corey did in the endzone 3 plays in a row in man.
[/quote]

and they got stopped right?

How many of those 240 yards thrown were completed on man coverage? I'll do that breakdown for you tom night
[/quote]the only one that been manned is corey, they said they were going to start doing that 2 weeks ago.
[/quote]

how many times did ross give up plays in man yesterday?

3 off the top of my head and he basically only played the first half

[MattMeyerBud]

[quote user="dezzzR"]anyone watch the marquez pacman fight? it was a close one. something about marquez style makes it a hard fight for pacman. pacman floyd next finally?? saw a bunch of shirt in the crowd that said

"Run Floyd". haha i want one.
[/quote]

I actually stayed true... im not buying boxing until its pac vs may

but I heard they may charge like 90 bucks for the PPV

if they do that then I won't watch just out of spite.

alot of people said Marquez got robbed

[dezzzR]

[quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]the offense for giving the ball to SF on the 17 and then special teams for not staying true to their responsibilities on kick return and giving SF the ball on the 50
[/quote]

If I have to place blame on a particular player/set of players it's on Manningham.

you can't stop like that, he reverted to last year...that **** was happening constantly last year.
[/quote]

well I agree...

but still Dezz is on an anti-fewell rant and has tried so far saying that:

-it was completely the defenses fault
-fewells scheme
-9ers aren't that good, they play in weak division

hes just on his anti-fewell thing and trying to apply it to the loss. <u>Im not a fewell fan but alot of completed balls yesterday were in man coverages,</u> aka our guys getting beat.

Not that it even happened THAT much. Regardless the defense was on the hook for about 10 points that should of never even happened.

While I do consider it a team loss, if I HAD to put blame it would be on the offense side of things
[/quote]uhhh no there wasnt. there were a few. look what corey did in the endzone 3 plays in a row in man.
[/quote]

and they got stopped right?

How many of those 240 yards thrown were completed on man coverage? I'll do that breakdown for you tom night
[/quote]the only one that been manned is corey, they said they were going to start doing that 2 weeks ago.
[/quote]

how many times did ross give up plays in man yesterday?

3 off the top of my head and he basically only played the first half
[/quote]thats good, id rather that then having them wide open.

listen here sonnyjim, giants defense gave up 27 points yesterday. end of story, stop making excuses.

[DavenIII]

To me it looked like Manningham thought it was a broken play...I mean Eli was moving around in the pocket a little....and they do train receivers to break off a route and get open when the QB is running...but Manningham just did it too early....at the worst possible moment.

[JPizzack]

[quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="lttaylor56"][quote user="JPizzack"]


[quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]the offense for giving the ball to SF on the 17 and then special teams for not staying true to their responsibilities on kick return and giving SF the ball on the 50
[/quote]

If I have to place blame on a particular player/set of players it's on Manningham.

you can't stop like that, he reverted to last year...that **** was happening constantly last year.
[/quote]</P>


I have to wonder....
Is Manningham good, or does Eli just make him look good when they connect?!</P>


[/quote]A question def worth consideration.
[/quote]hes good.
[/quote]</P>


Soooo like....he's good, but he just sucks?
Dont we already have that role filled by Victor Cruz? We cant have 2 ****ty good WRs, it can never work that way...</P>

[MattMeyerBud]

[quote user="lttaylor56"][quote user="JPizzack"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="JPizzack"]


[quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]the offense for giving the ball to SF on the 17 and then special teams for not staying true to their responsibilities on kick return and giving SF the ball on the 50
[/quote]

If I have to place blame on a particular player/set of players it's on Manningham.

you can't stop like that, he reverted to last year...that **** was happening constantly last year.
[/quote]</p>


I have to wonder....
Is Manningham good, or does Eli just make him look good when they connect?!</p>


[/quote]

we'll know this offseason what the giants think. Mario is a FA.

Personally I think hes gone and Smith's back.
[/quote]</p>


Sucks to think about....I mean he still IS a good option...but, maybe.
If so, I think I was right about what receivers we would keep. haha....except Smith messed the whole thing up when he ditched us.</p>[/quote]....and the dumbass left me with a Jersey to stare at and not know wtf to do with.
[/quote]

me too

a hot *** black and red giants jersey. Love at first sight

and i can't ever rock it

[MattMeyerBud]

[quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]the offense for giving the ball to SF on the 17 and then special teams for not staying true to their responsibilities on kick return and giving SF the ball on the 50
[/quote]

If I have to place blame on a particular player/set of players it's on Manningham.

you can't stop like that, he reverted to last year...that **** was happening constantly last year.
[/quote]

well I agree...

but still Dezz is on an anti-fewell rant and has tried so far saying that:

-it was completely the defenses fault
-fewells scheme
-9ers aren't that good, they play in weak division

hes just on his anti-fewell thing and trying to apply it to the loss. <u>Im not a fewell fan but alot of completed balls yesterday were in man coverages,</u> aka our guys getting beat.

Not that it even happened THAT much. Regardless the defense was on the hook for about 10 points that should of never even happened.

While I do consider it a team loss, if I HAD to put blame it would be on the offense side of things
[/quote]uhhh no there wasnt. there were a few. look what corey did in the endzone 3 plays in a row in man.
[/quote]

and they got stopped right?

How many of those 240 yards thrown were completed on man coverage? I'll do that breakdown for you tom night
[/quote]the only one that been manned is corey, they said they were going to start doing that 2 weeks ago.
[/quote]

how many times did ross give up plays in man yesterday?

3 off the top of my head and he basically only played the first half
[/quote]thats good, id rather that then having them wide open.

listen here sonnyjim, giants defense gave up 27 points yesterday. end of story, stop making excuses.
[/quote]

well that shows how full of **** u are, sonny jim