THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

[MattMeyerBud]

[quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="lttaylor56"][quote user="dezzzR"]http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...dential_ballot[/quote]Very good to read. I can't wait until the idiot leaves office.[/quote]newts beating obama 45%-43%.
[/quote]

u a betting man?
[/quote]you know it. newt will go up one side of bam and down the other in a debate.
if newt wins the primary he said he would challenge obama to 7, 3 hour long debates, obama will refuse because he knows hell get owned. newt will then follow obama everywhere he goes by 4 hours to debunk his talking points until he accepts.

this is the same strategy abe lincoln used when he was trailing james buchanan. abe challenged him to debate for 100 days until election day. james thought he was crazy and refused, abe followed him where ever he went and buhcanans numbers started dropping until he accepted and abe owned him in the debates.


its going to be much closer than everyone thinks if newt can keep his foot out of his mouth.

[/quote]

Newt has ZERO chance at beating Obama
[/quote]lol i just posted a poll that shows hes 2 points ahead of obama. obama cant run on hope and change this time and he has very little to show for the 5 trillion hes spent.
[/quote]

lol polls. Zero shot i'll put anything u want on it
[/quote]whats zero shot? hell get blown out? please tell me how obama can blow anybody out with fast and furious scandal, solyndra scandal, his disastrous and highly expensive healthcare bill, all his vacation time, failed stimulus, all of the campaign promises he broke from the first run, and his inability to get anything done? but most importantly, wheres the jobs?? and thats what americans will be asking.
[/quote]

same way bush got by on the second term: no decent candidates to oppose. Americans voting history speaks for itself - only 5 presidents have not been elected after 1 term. Couple that with the mockery that the Republicans are doing with this group. Zero shot...

right now OBama is back in office, your crazy if u think Newt would get voted in over him

[DavenIII]

[quote user="MattMeyerBud"]

zero shot

right now, Obama round 2
[/quote]

I'm glad I think you have no idea what your talking about otherwise that'd be worrying...

I'm against pointless war's, business controlling government, degradation of personal liberties, and unemployment...those are all the things Obama is promising if he gets elected again...that's pretty much his platform...he states it in such a way that you are convinced they are "good" things....but when it's simplified that's what he stands for....but you'll put your head in the sand and refuse to believe it so I don't know why I'm even bringing it up again.

[MattMeyerBud]

[quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]Republican party is killing it self, this next debate hosted by THE DONALD will gift wrap it for Obama
[/quote]
There isn't one serious candidate in the bunch, well Ron Paul, but no one will listen to him because he's anti war.

That said It's hard to believe that Obama would beat any candidate period, pretty sure the Donald could beat him, Obama over the last 4 years has solidified his place as "literally" the worst president in American History...bar none, it's not even close....so I can't imagine anyone losing to him.
[/quote]i think it will be close. obama does have a BILLION dollars to run with.
[/quote]

I can't imagine anyone still believes his bull**** anymore, he's done nothing but lie about everything his entire term (and even before it while on campaigning) it doesn't matter how much money you have, the money is to help get your points out there....but if no one believes any of your points it doesn't matter how much exposure they have.

the only way it will be close is if there is enough brainwashed (young) members of society out there that will vote for him even if he is in direct contrast to what they want simple cause they don't know wtf is going on....AND if a third party candidate steals all the conservative votes.
[/quote]

its funny that u suggest everyone. You have a shut in opinion of people who agree with your points and label that as everybody

Regardless of what you say Obama is back in. Im sure once it happens you'll come back with some garbage, but its in the bag.

[MattMeyerBud]

[quote user="dezzzR"]and i find it funny how obamas always looking up to old republican
presidents. lincoln, and now teddy. but he couldnt be further from those
two, politically AND characteristically.[/quote]

actually politically hes been VERY conservative

[dezzzR]

[quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="lttaylor56"][quote user="dezzzR"]http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...dential_ballot[/quote]Very good to read. I can't wait until the idiot leaves office.[/quote]newts beating obama 45%-43%.
[/quote]

u a betting man?
[/quote]you know it. newt will go up one side of bam and down the other in a debate.
if newt wins the primary he said he would challenge obama to 7, 3 hour long debates, obama will refuse because he knows hell get owned. newt will then follow obama everywhere he goes by 4 hours to debunk his talking points until he accepts.

this is the same strategy abe lincoln used when he was trailing james buchanan. abe challenged him to debate for 100 days until election day. james thought he was crazy and refused, abe followed him where ever he went and buhcanans numbers started dropping until he accepted and abe owned him in the debates.


its going to be much closer than everyone thinks if newt can keep his foot out of his mouth.

[/quote]

Newt has ZERO chance at beating Obama
[/quote]lol i just posted a poll that shows hes 2 points ahead of obama. obama cant run on hope and change this time and he has very little to show for the 5 trillion hes spent.
[/quote]

lol polls. Zero shot i'll put anything u want on it
[/quote]whats zero shot? hell get blown out? please tell me how obama can blow anybody out with fast and furious scandal, solyndra scandal, his disastrous and highly expensive healthcare bill, all his vacation time, failed stimulus, all of the campaign promises he broke from the first run, and his inability to get anything done? but most importantly, wheres the jobs?? and thats what americans will be asking.
[/quote]

same way bush got by on the second term: no decent candidates to oppose. Americans voting history speaks for itself - only 5 presidents have not been elected after 1 term. Couple that with the mockery that the Republicans are doing with this group. Zero shot...

right now OBama is back in office, your crazy if u think Newt would get voted in over him
[/quote]like i said i think it will be close. newt WILL win the debates, and bam still has the left wing media and a billion bucks, BUT<u> people are fed up</u>. nothings gotten better under bam. food, gas prices, every things going up in price and unemployments STILL over 10, i dont care what the media says.

[DavenIII]

[quote user="MattMeyerBud"]same way bush got by on the second term: no decent candidates to oppose[/quote]

Bush got re-elected due to the War, the country wanted continuity, I know you were against the war Matt, but the majority of Americans democrats and republicans together where for it the same way you don't change head coaches in the middle of a season you don't change the commander and chief in the middle of a War.

The only thing Obama has presided over is record spending...almost all of which has to be considered wasteful at this point....that's not something the American people will want continuity on.

[DavenIII]

[quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="dezzzR"]and i find it funny how obamas always looking up to old republican
presidents. lincoln, and now teddy. but he couldnt be further from those
two, politically AND characteristically.[/quote]

actually politically hes been VERY conservative
[/quote]

clearly you don't understand what conservatism means, but we all knew that already...god you really are brainwashed.

[MattMeyerBud]

[quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="dezzzR"]and i find it funny how obamas always looking up to old republican
presidents. lincoln, and now teddy. but he couldnt be further from those
two, politically AND characteristically.[/quote]

actually politically hes been VERY conservative
[/quote]

clearly you don't understand what conservatism means, but we all knew that already...god you really are brainwashed.
[/quote]

lol i know Daven - its hard to accept. Don't worry, you'll have 4 more years to try and swallow it

[dezzzR]

[quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="dezzzR"]and i find it funny how obamas always looking up to old republican
presidents. lincoln, and now teddy. but he couldnt be further from those
two, politically AND characteristically.[/quote]

actually politically hes been VERY conservative
[/quote]obamas said he believes" the redistribution of wealth is a good thing." pretty much the exact opposite of what abe and ted believed.

[bigblue4417]

[quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="bigblue4417"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="bigblue4417"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="bigblue4417"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][/quote]
I'm honored you think I'll be in the finals. I guess it's your way of saying you are great Landon and you played a great year all by yourself. I never thought you would be able to do it but you proved me wrong and I'll never give you **** again about people drafting your team and helping you because obviously that didn't happen without saying it. Right? lol


[/quote]

TRUTH TIME:

I KNOW that your first two draft me and your philly friend helped u tons. Not opinion, but factual

<font color="#0000FF">And the reality of it is that ur team would NOT be good unless u were able to take Vick off of Sharick for peanuts.</font> It lead to every other trade u were able to get off. Only thing thats proven is that your for the rule when it benefits you and against it when you THINK it isn't. BTW, i think u owe blondie an apology and a thank you
[/quote]
Well so much for that...lol

Yeah, if I kept Matt Ryan and Stafford I would have been ****ed. It's fine, you don't have to give me any credit. I told you before this all started that I would finish above you and once again for the 3rd year in a row I will. Had Blondie not pulled that trade she still would have beat MH so it doesn't matter. That trade will end up hurting you in the long run after MH beats you by 30 or 40. You are so stubborn. He helped me with 2 picks but according to you he drafted my whole team and made all my trades for me.

I am not against the rule at all. I backed up the rule countless times. I just thought it was ****ed up that the last place team traded with the 3rd place team. I started the whole thing wrong. It was not the players that were traded, it was the situation. I thought we said that if last place teams traded with 1st place teams it could be vetoed. Blondie had nothing to play for and made MH's team considerably better. It's 6s at this point so whatever. I would not have even said anything but it upset me that everyone just **** on B.

[/quote]

by what logic would u of been ****ed if u kept Stafford and Ryan.

[/quote]
Apparently it's yours. I was being sarcastic. You said it's the only reason I was able to make any of my other trades which could not be farther from the truth. I moved Jordy for Best and Best for Maclin. I moved Stafford for Graham essentially ( which was probably a bad trade for me ) and still would have had Ryan. The fact I got Vick did nothing for my trade prospects. Then I moved Jennings and Beanie for AP ( which was also a bad trade for me ). Vick has been hurt the whole damn time anyway. If I don't win this year I have no one but myself to blame. Maybe I made too many moves....
[/quote]

truth time again:

Lando trades a backup QB and FA back up WR for MIKE VICK. Possibly the most dynamic fantasy player in the game who WILL be healthy for fantasy playoffs. Not to mention that he also single handedly outscored Ryan and Washington single handedly for the first 5 weeks of the trade which put u over the top.

<font color="#0000FF">the fact you were able to get so much value for nothing AND STILL have a legit QB on your team is what opened your whole season up. </font>

You were then were able to trade Greg Jennings &amp; Beanie Wells 4 Adrian Peterson. I think we could all agree that he'll probably be the #1 pick again next year as hes been for the past 3-4 years.

Fair enough trade right? Not really

Because u were then able to move stafford 4 Jimmy Graham.

So really you were able to upgrade Beanie to Peterson and Vick for Matt Ryan/Stafford in exchanging Jimmy Graham for Jennings which is a push....

I respect the moves cuz u pulled em off, can't respect you because your not man enough to admit the truth of the story (Fantasy wise).

When I traded with Daven I admitted I got the better end of the deal, just no where near where u guys are suggesting and it ended up hurting my team anyway. Be honest

Your team was completely upgraded and did enough damage before AP and Vick got hurt to get u a bye and have them healthy for playoffs. Your soooo full of ****

[/quote]
Not my awesome draft huh? Minus CJ of course. lol

I guess I will have to try and win you over next year when you are looking up at me AGAIN. All I can do is put my team in the best position to win and find the best and most fair deals possible. I have no control if someone values Ryan higher than Vick or any other scenario you have trashed me on.