[quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="DavenIII"]Yes to Flex
What the hell?
The reason I'm anti flex is because I bought YOUR argument that having no flex was better for good players.[/quote]
I don't know if I ever made that argument lol Matt was always against flex I was always for it.
I like being able to choose 3RB's or 3WR's each week, Matt has this idea that Fantasy is still about the RB (it used to be) so when you allow flex everyone will choose 3 good RB's....this won't happen but that's what he "thinks" will happen.
I'm confused.....No flex would make the RB LESS important.[/quote]
Matt's point - Flex = 3 RB's for everyone all the time.
My Point - Flex = more options for everyone every week.
and while I may have said something to the effect of "you know you are playing in a deep league when you play X Receiver" that is completely separate from whether flex is involved or not...they really have nothing to do with each other, you can play a deep league with flex or without.
No my argument is that strategy should be in how you build your team and weekly matchups is a secondary strategy. When you do 2 WR flex leagues it always puts a rush on running backs. It's something that has been proven time and time again with you when we got back and look at draft results.
Personally I say we compromise, 3 WR flex league, 6 point qb td. Tht way everybody is happy[/quote]
What is a 3 WR flex league? 2 RB's, 3 WR's, PLUS a flex?