1. #135791
    All-Pro Kase-1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    BK 2 LI
    Posts
    13,637

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

    [quote user="MattMeyerBud"]3 WR FLEX IS IN!

    NEXT VOTE:

    HOW MUCH SHOULD QB TDS BE WORTH?

    4 Points:

    6 Points:

    I am undecided to be honest.

    IF the boards shut down we will continue this on facebook. since all of u except Pats and LT are on there. I have LTs phone number though.

    But lets get the votes in while we can. 6 votes wins.
    [/quote]I vote for 4pts
    Come check the G-Fambulance and The Scarf Soldiers every home game in Lot L6, and like us on facebook and instagam 'NYG Scarf Soldiers'


  2. #135792

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

    Pie is better than cake....hair pie is better than both

    I simply cannot believe that they are finally moving to the new boards. I will not believe it till I see it.


  3. #135793

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

    [quote user="byron"][quote user="lttaylor56"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]3 WR FLEX IS IN!

    NEXT VOTE:

    HOW MUCH SHOULD QB TDS BE WORTH?

    4 Points: Daven, Sharick

    6 Points: Byron, Pappy, Amanda, Matt, Lando

    I am undecided to be honest.

    IF the boards shut down we will continue this on facebook. since all of u except Pats and LT are on there. I have LTs phone number though.

    One more and its 6 TDs[/quote]Wow , guess I missed alot in a week and a half. Why are boards shutting down? Are we moving to the new boards finally? I am casting my defensive vote: Defensive teams not players.[/quote] Hey LT new boards this one is shutting down tommorow *till I believe monday[/quote]Thanks B. How are those dogs?

  4. #135794
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    8,823

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD



    [quote user="lttaylor56"][quote user="byron"][quote user="lttaylor56"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]3 WR FLEX IS IN!

    NEXT VOTE:

    HOW MUCH SHOULD QB TDS BE WORTH?

    4 Points: Daven, Sharick

    6 Points: Byron, Pappy, Amanda, Matt, Lando

    I am undecided to be honest.

    IF the boards shut down we will continue this on facebook. since all of u except Pats and LT are on there. I have LTs phone number though.

    One more and its 6 TDs[/quote]Wow , guess I missed alot in a week and a half. Why are boards shutting down? Are we moving to the new boards finally? I am casting my defensive vote: Defensive teams not players.[/quote] Hey LT new boards this one is shutting down tommorow till I believe monday[/quote]Thanks B. How are those dogs?[/quote] your welcome man dogs are doing good we have a 5 pup liter right now at 5 weeks old</P>


    mr green he's the biggest of the bunch 11lbs... big paws</P>


    </P>


    we have some chocolates on the way first chocolate litter in while for us</P>


    see you all on the other side !</P>

  5. #135795
    All-Pro JPizzack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Poughkeepsie, NY. Heeltown, USA
    Posts
    35,545

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD



    YO</P>


    i know i dont have a vote, cuz i wasnt in A-league last year....but, whats with this "compromise" vote??

    I mean, I thought the vote was standard (3WR/2RB) vs Flex (2RB/2WR/+flex)

    now call me crazy....but why would someone have voted standard if they knew that that this 2nd vote would essentially open up the SAME EXACT ****ing option. </P>


    the way I see it, the flex spot already devalues RB selections cuz traditionally you want the consistency from RBs...if you have 3 WRs already, who is going to start a 4th WR in the flex spot?? nobody. These votes essentially FORCE extra RBs on your roster no matter what the decision is....</P>
    Oderint Dum Metuant

    It's too bad, I'm too good....

  6. #135796

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

    [quote user="JPizzack"]

    YO</P>


    i know i dont have a vote, cuz i wasnt in A-league last year....but, whats with this "compromise" vote??

    I mean, I thought the vote was standard (3WR/2RB) vs Flex (2RB/2WR/+flex)

    now call me crazy....but why would someone have voted standard if they knew that that this 2nd vote would essentially open up the SAME EXACT ****ing option. </P>


    the way I see it, the flex spot already devalues RB selections cuz traditionally you want the consistency from RBs...if you have 3 WRs already, who is going to start a 4th WR in the flex spot?? nobody. These votes essentially FORCE extra RBs on your roster no matter what the decision is....</P>[/quote]Pizz makes good sense with this one.

    Btw--How are we on the board today? I thought it shuts down today?

  7. #135797

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

    [quote user="byron"]

    [quote user="lttaylor56"][quote user="byron"][quote user="lttaylor56"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]3 WR FLEX IS IN!

    NEXT VOTE:

    HOW MUCH SHOULD QB TDS BE WORTH?

    4 Points: Daven, Sharick

    6 Points: Byron, Pappy, Amanda, Matt, Lando

    I am undecided to be honest.

    IF the boards shut down we will continue this on facebook. since all of u except Pats and LT are on there. I have LTs phone number though.

    One more and its 6 TDs[/quote]Wow , guess I missed alot in a week and a half. Why are boards shutting down? Are we moving to the new boards finally? I am casting my defensive vote: Defensive teams not players.[/quote] Hey LT new boards this one is shutting down tommorow *till I believe monday[/quote]Thanks B. How are those dogs?[/quote] your welcome man dogs are doing good we have a 5 pup liter right now at 5 weeks old</P>


    mr green he's the biggest of the bunch 11lbs... big paws</P>


    </P>


    we have some chocolates on the way first chocolate litter in while for us</P>


    see you all on the other side !</P>[/quote]That is a solid dog =P

  8. #135798
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    15,681

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

    [quote user="lttaylor56"][quote user="JPizzack"]

    YO</p>


    i know i dont have a vote, cuz i wasnt in A-league last year....but, whats with this "compromise" vote??

    I mean, I thought the vote was standard (3WR/2RB) vs Flex (2RB/2WR/+flex)

    now call me crazy....but why would someone have voted standard if they knew that that this 2nd vote would essentially open up the SAME EXACT ****ing option. </p>


    the way I see it, the flex spot already devalues RB selections cuz traditionally you want the consistency from RBs...if you have 3 WRs already, who is going to start a 4th WR in the flex spot?? nobody. These votes essentially FORCE extra RBs on your roster no matter what the decision is....</p>[/quote]Pizz makes good sense with this one.

    Btw--How are we on the board today? I thought it shuts down today?[/quote]

    LT+Kase+Pizz

    THIS is what happened.

    3WR vs 2WR=Flex was in the middle of being voted on and Matt came up with a "compromise" 3 WR + Flex

    I mentioned I would like that...so what we did was we finished the 3WR vs 2WR+Flex vote...

    2WR+Flex won.

    then after that Matt started ANOTHER separate vote, that vote was to see if we as a league should accept the compromise Matt came up with instead of the regular 2WR+Flex that we had just decided upon.

    that vote was pretty unanimous there was enough votes from the people here at the time that it was passed.

  9. #135799
    All-Pro JPizzack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Poughkeepsie, NY. Heeltown, USA
    Posts
    35,545

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

    [quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="lttaylor56"][quote user="JPizzack"]


    YO</P>


    i know i dont have a vote, cuz i wasnt in A-league last year....but, whats with this "compromise" vote??

    I mean, I thought the vote was standard (3WR/2RB) vs Flex (2RB/2WR/+flex)

    now call me crazy....but why would someone have voted standard if they knew that that this 2nd vote would essentially open up the SAME EXACT ****ing option. </P>


    the way I see it, the flex spot already devalues RB selections cuz traditionally you want the consistency from RBs...if you have 3 WRs already, who is going to start a 4th WR in the flex spot?? nobody. These votes essentially FORCE extra RBs on your roster no matter what the decision is....</P>


    [/quote]Pizz makes good sense with this one. Btw--How are we on the board today? I thought it shuts down today?[/quote]

    LT+Kase+Pizz

    THIS is what happened.

    3WR vs 2WR=Flex was in the middle of being voted on and Matt came up with a "compromise" 3 WR + Flex

    I mentioned I would like that...so what we did was we finished the 3WR vs 2WR+Flex vote...

    2WR+Flex won.

    then after that Matt started ANOTHER separate vote, that vote was to see if we as a league should accept the compromise Matt came up with instead of the regular 2WR+Flex that we had just decided upon.

    that vote was pretty unanimous there was enough votes from the people here at the time that it was passed.
    [/quote]</P>


    wtf.....thats insane how ppl voted for both...
    2WR+flex....there's a choice...
    3WR + flex.....there's no choice what im doing with that slot....</P>


    it's as if youre voting on whether or not you actually want control of your team....if you DONT....3wr + flex is the way to go...lol</P>
    Oderint Dum Metuant

    It's too bad, I'm too good....

  10. #135800
    Hall of Famer MattMeyerBud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    60,671

    Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

    [quote user="JPizzack"]

    YO</P>


    i know i dont have a vote, cuz i wasnt in A-league last year....but, whats with this "compromise" vote??

    I mean, I thought the vote was standard (3WR/2RB) vs Flex (2RB/2WR/+flex)

    now call me crazy....but why would someone have voted standard if they knew that that this 2nd vote would essentially open up the SAME EXACT ****ing option. </P>


    the way I see it, the flex spot already devalues RB selections cuz traditionally you want the consistency from RBs...if you have 3 WRs already, who is going to start a 4th WR in the flex spot?? nobody. These votes essentially FORCE extra RBs on your roster no matter what the decision is....</P>[/quote]

    i agree flex devalues RB, but having the 3 WRs kind of take away from that because you HAVE to go 3 WRs. It opens up for more stratagy.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts