[quote user="JPizzack"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="lttaylor56"][quote user="JPizzack"]
i know i dont have a vote, cuz i wasnt in A-league last year....but, whats with this "compromise" vote??
I mean, I thought the vote was standard (3WR/2RB) vs Flex (2RB/2WR/+flex)
now call me crazy....but why would someone have voted standard if they knew that that this 2nd vote would essentially open up the SAME EXACT ****ing option. </P>
the way I see it, the flex spot already devalues RB selections cuz traditionally you want the consistency from RBs...if you have 3 WRs already, who is going to start a 4th WR in the flex spot?? nobody. These votes essentially FORCE extra RBs on your roster no matter what the decision is....</P>
[/quote]Pizz makes good sense with this one. Btw--How are we on the board today? I thought it shuts down today?[/quote]
THIS is what happened.
3WR vs 2WR=Flex was in the middle of being voted on and Matt came up with a "compromise" 3 WR + Flex
I mentioned I would like that...so what we did was we finished the 3WR vs 2WR+Flex vote...
then after that Matt started ANOTHER separate vote, that vote was to see if we as a league should accept the compromise Matt came up with instead of the regular 2WR+Flex that we had just decided upon.
that vote was pretty unanimous there was enough votes from the people here at the time that it was passed.*
wtf.....thats insane how ppl voted for both...
2WR+flex....there's a choice...
3WR + flex.....there's no choice what im doing with that slot....</P>
it's as if youre voting on whether or not you actually want control of your team....if you DONT....3wr + flex is the way to go...lol</P>[/quote]
you can go for the 3 RBs, but then your WRs will take a serious hit. It plays into the stats that Daven was saying yesterday (which he over exaggerated though, but the main point was correct).
You can't disregard WRs with a 3 WR flex like u can with the 2 WR flex, it has to be accounted for.
You can also use TEs as a Flex