It doesn't change the fact that they are able to be amended BUT you make it sound as though it would be no big deal.
The problem is removing the 2nd amendment is no different then removing the 1st in terms of importance or difficulty, so yeah you can remove guns, you can also remove free speech.
the question is "SHOULD" we, not can we.
If we should remove or change the 2nd amendment then should we look at the 1st? what about the 6th?
you open up are terrible terrible discussion if you allow the government to start changing the Bill Of Rights, for what? to endanger everyday citizens by taking away their protection? there is NOTHING good that would come of this only bad.
Last edited by DavenIII; 02-13-2013 at 04:45 PM.
Bipartisan(Mark Kirk, R- Illinois) exploding fistbump. your argument is irrelevant
![]()
Oderint Dum Metuant
dude you are SUUUUUUUUCH A ****ING DOWNER!!! Yes, I KNOW!! Thanks. I read.
Here I am, trying to brighten up a thread that you *******s destroy with your stupid arguments, and you turn it so dark!!! Youre like 40 years older than your actual age. And yet, youve repeatedly call me the one with a bad attitude? look in a mirror pops
Last edited by JPizzack; 02-13-2013 at 07:34 PM.
Oderint Dum Metuant
Last edited by Morehead State; 02-13-2013 at 08:56 PM.
reverbnation.com/yummytheunderdog
One of those generals is a huge Giants fan. Hes given speeches to the team in huge games including the superbowl.
how does repeating a false optic (Bipartisan Fistbump) "brighten up" the thread? I hate that the media is wholly on Obama's side and that anything that can remotely be misconstrued as him working together with the republicans is picked up on and played everywhere...even when it has nothing to do with politics at all, the worst part is that it masks his true intentions, which is to create the largest divide possible.
so no, you repeating white house propaganda does not..."brighten" the thread up Pez.
Last edited by DavenIII; 02-14-2013 at 08:59 AM.