1. #25001
    Hall of Famer MattMeyerBud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    60,564

    Re: Oct 11th vs RAIDERS --- We Be Meeting Up

    [quote user="ibleedblue85"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="ibleedblue85"]


    [quote user="bigblue4417"][quote user="dezzzR"]wtf??roy williams broke his collar bone? [/quote]
    I read X rays were negative. Where did you see this?
    [/quote]</p>


    whats going on- i dont feel like reading 4-5 pages.... whos complaining about the flex?!</p>


    [/quote]

    MMB, of course, he's got a problem with everything....big cry baby.

    apparently he doesn't know things have changed and that RB's aren't mandatory first draft picks, apparently he doesn't realize that most RB's split time now...so he thinks the ability to start 3 RBs (or WR's) means you HAVE TO start 3 RB's and that it forces you to draft more RB's....

    he's wrong of course. but that's what he's complaining about.
    [/quote]

    in a flex league 10 out of 12 are going to be RBs minimum
    [/quote]</p>


    not always, esp withRBs splitting time now you could def either start a #2 reciever or a back up running back... also it depends on bye weeks and injuries but i think i had a WR in the flex more then a RB</p>[/quote]

    then that just means u got beat to the third running back lol..

    did u win ur league? if u think having a Kevin Walter , some type of 6th round WR is better than having a 3rd RB in the third round, then cool... i'll enjoy REALLY winning this league....

    honestly with this way every team is guaranteed to have 2 backs after the first 3 rounds... and that is why i don't like it... there is less stratagy drafting....
    Fear the name, appreciate the game

  2. #25002
    Hall of Famer MattMeyerBud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    60,564

    Re: Oct 11th vs RAIDERS --- We Be Meeting Up

    [quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]
    in a flex league 10 out of 12 are going to be RBs minimum
    [/quote]

    I'm willing to bet that's not the case.

    Brady/Manning will got top 12.

    Fitz/Johnson and Johnson will got top 12.

    that's 5 already...now, it maybe 2 or 3 QB's 3 or 4 WR and 5-7 RB's so RB's will still be a focus, but they will be in a 3 WR's league too anyhow in the first round.
    [/quote]

    whatever, i vote no, lando voted no... thats 2-2



    i said i dont' really care, but it def makes the draft more boring and less strategic...



    all of those articles u sent me are not applicable to flex leagues and
    flex leagues are not the traditional format. Hence why they are known
    as flex leagues.





    first of the fact taht u have manning over breez just shows ur lack of fantasy knowledge lol.



    and i doubt breez manning are first rounders ina flex league...


    i'll bet u 50 bucks that more than 7 RBs are taken in the first round
    Fear the name, appreciate the game

  3. #25003

    Re: Oct 11th vs RAIDERS --- We Be Meeting Up

    [quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="ibleedblue85"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="ibleedblue85"]


    [quote user="bigblue4417"][quote user="dezzzR"]wtf??roy williams broke his collar bone? [/quote]
    I read X rays were negative. Where did you see this?
    [/quote]</P>


    whats going on- i dont feel like reading 4-5 pages.... whos complaining about the flex?!</P>


    [/quote]

    MMB, of course, he's got a problem with everything....big cry baby.

    apparently he doesn't know things have changed and that RB's aren't mandatory first draft picks, apparently he doesn't realize that most RB's split time now...so he thinks the ability to start 3 RBs (or WR's) means you HAVE TO start 3 RB's and that it forces you to draft more RB's....

    he's wrong of course. but that's what he's complaining about.
    [/quote]

    in a flex league 10 out of 12 are going to be RBs minimum
    [/quote]</P>


    not always, esp withRBs splitting time now you could def either start a #2 reciever or a back up running back... also it depends on bye weeks and injuries but i think i had a WR in the flex more then a RB</P>


    [/quote]

    then that just means u got beat to the third running back lol..

    did u win ur league? if u think having a Kevin Walter , some type of 6th round WR is better than having a 3rd RB in the third round, then cool... i'll enjoy REALLY winning this league....

    honestly with this way every team is guaranteed to have 2 backs after the first 3 rounds... and that is why i don't like it... there is less stratagy drafting....
    [/quote]</P>


    not at all... with the7th pick there is a good chance i def only have one by the third round... and it doesnt mean i got shafted on a 3rd RB... my rbs were nasty but injury prone so i used WRs there and outta a 14 team league i got 3rd... i shoulda won it all but 1st round of playoffs i played kurt warner who put up like 50 points so i got shafted and still only lost by 2 point and then won out therefore getting thrid so do not challenge my fantasy skills... why dont you shut your mouth and start looking at vacation sights since you will be taking me away come january..........</P>

  4. #25004
    Hall of Famer MattMeyerBud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    60,564

    Re: Oct 11th vs RAIDERS --- We Be Meeting Up

    [quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="ibleedblue85"]every single league i have ever done has had a flex position... lol this was dicussed when i set the league up!! why is this a problem now?![/quote]

    yeah up until last year ever league I'd ever done was a Flex too...I think it's by far the most common league but MMB says otherwise so I suppose I must be wrong.
    [/quote]

    i am in the same 3 money leagues every year.. never had a flex... default for yahoo and espn are without the flex...

    that alone suggests ur wrong about what u think is traditional
    Fear the name, appreciate the game

  5. #25005

    Re: Oct 11th vs RAIDERS --- We Be Meeting Up



    [quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]
    in a flex league 10 out of 12 are going to be RBs minimum
    [/quote]

    I'm willing to bet that's not the case.

    Brady/Manning will got top 12.

    Fitz/Johnson and Johnson will got top 12.

    that's 5 already...now, it maybe 2 or 3 QB's 3 or 4 WR and 5-7 RB's so RB's will still be a focus, but they will be in a 3 WR's league too anyhow in the first round.
    [/quote]

    whatever, i vote no, lando voted no... thats 2-2

    i said i dont' really care, but it def makes the draft more boring and less strategic...

    all of those articles u sent me are not applicable to flex leagues and flex leagues are not the traditional format. Hence why they are known as flex leagues.


    first of the fact taht u have manning over breez just shows ur lack of fantasy knowledge lol.

    and i doubt breez manning are first rounders ina flex league...


    i'll bet u 50 bucks that more than 7 RBs are taken in the first round
    [/quote]</P>


    about 7 RBs are taken in the first round regardless if there is flex for not so thats bull****</P>

  6. #25006
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    15,649

    Re: Oct 11th vs RAIDERS --- We Be Meeting Up

    [quote user="MattMeyerBud"]honestly with this way every team is guaranteed to have 2 backs after the first 3 rounds... and that is why i don't like it... there is less stratagy drafting....
    [/quote]

    simply not true, just because you think that's the best way to go about it doesn't mean it is.

    WR's score just as many points as RB's and Kevin Walter is a beast in FF.

    Kevin Walter - 130 points last year.

    RB's with less?

    Larry Johnson - 120
    Reggie Bush - 127
    Jamal Lewis - 126
    Tim Hightower - 112
    Willis McGahee - 106
    Joseph Addai - 107


    Yeah...all those RB's are 3rd RB's right MMB...you don't know what you are talking about when it comes to FF...I can't wait till you are trashed in this league.

  7. #25007
    Hall of Famer MattMeyerBud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    60,564

    Re: Oct 11th vs RAIDERS --- We Be Meeting Up

    [quote user="ibleedblue85"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="ibleedblue85"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="ibleedblue85"]


    [quote user="bigblue4417"][quote user="dezzzR"]wtf??roy williams broke his collar bone? [/quote]
    I read X rays were negative. Where did you see this?
    [/quote]</p>


    whats going on- i dont feel like reading 4-5 pages.... whos complaining about the flex?!</p>


    [/quote]

    MMB, of course, he's got a problem with everything....big cry baby.

    apparently he doesn't know things have changed and that RB's aren't mandatory first draft picks, apparently he doesn't realize that most RB's split time now...so he thinks the ability to start 3 RBs (or WR's) means you HAVE TO start 3 RB's and that it forces you to draft more RB's....

    he's wrong of course. but that's what he's complaining about.
    [/quote]

    in a flex league 10 out of 12 are going to be RBs minimum
    [/quote]</p>


    not always, esp withRBs splitting time now you could def either start a #2 reciever or a back up running back... also it depends on bye weeks and injuries but i think i had a WR in the flex more then a RB</p>


    [/quote]

    then that just means u got beat to the third running back lol..

    did u win ur league? if u think having a Kevin Walter , some type of 6th round WR is better than having a 3rd RB in the third round, then cool... i'll enjoy REALLY winning this league....

    honestly with this way every team is guaranteed to have 2 backs after the first 3 rounds... and that is why i don't like it... there is less stratagy drafting....
    [/quote]</p>


    not at all... with the7th pick there is a good chance i def only have one by the third round... and it doesnt mean i got shafted on a 3rd RB... my rbs were nasty but injury prone so i used WRs there and outta a 14 team league i got 3rd... i shoulda won it all but 1st round of playoffs i played kurt warner who put up like 50 points so i got shafted and still only lost by 2 point and then won out therefore getting thrid so do not challenge my fantasy skills... why dont you shut your mouth and start looking at vacation sights since you will be taking me away come january..........</p>[/quote]

    lol whatever we'll see blondie we'll see
    Fear the name, appreciate the game

  8. #25008
    Hall of Famer MattMeyerBud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    60,564

    Re: Oct 11th vs RAIDERS --- We Be Meeting Up

    [quote user="ibleedblue85"]

    [quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]
    in a flex league 10 out of 12 are going to be RBs minimum
    [/quote]

    I'm willing to bet that's not the case.

    Brady/Manning will got top 12.

    Fitz/Johnson and Johnson will got top 12.

    that's 5 already...now, it maybe 2 or 3 QB's 3 or 4 WR and 5-7 RB's so RB's will still be a focus, but they will be in a 3 WR's league too anyhow in the first round.
    [/quote]

    whatever, i vote no, lando voted no... thats 2-2

    i said i dont' really care, but it def makes the draft more boring and less strategic...

    all of those articles u sent me are not applicable to flex leagues and flex leagues are not the traditional format. Hence why they are known as flex leagues.


    first of the fact taht u have manning over breez just shows ur lack of fantasy knowledge lol.

    and i doubt breez manning are first rounders ina flex league...


    i'll bet u 50 bucks that more than 7 RBs are taken in the first round
    [/quote]</p>


    about 7 RBs are taken in the first round regardless if there is flex for not so thats bull****</p>[/quote]

    well my point is NO WAY 5 other picks are going to go on WITH the flex that aren't RBs... yes without the flex it could happen that way, it leaves room to work and do htings...

    but if u paly with a flex and try not to bag 3 sick RBs and then go hit or miss with all of the mid range WRs which are from like #12 to 30 overall which is a dime a dozen, then ur crazy
    Fear the name, appreciate the game

  9. #25009
    All-Pro Kase-1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    BK 2 LI
    Posts
    12,237

    Re: Oct 11th vs RAIDERS --- We Be Meeting Up

    I have been playin Fantasy FB for YEARS and have never heard of a league without a flex spot for a RB/WR. And MMB if someone wants 2 take a 3rd RB when there are still WRs thatll put up numbers let those fools do it..... Roddy White and Greg Jennings were my 2 main Flex players, along with Ricky Williams and I KILLED it!!!!

    If anyone wants 2 fall inline and pick up a RB for the flex spot just because its the norm, Im all for it and like MMB said, Ill REALLY enjoy taking your money
    Come check the G-Fambulance and The Scarf Soldiers every home game in Lot L6, and like us on facebook 'NYG Scarf Soldiers'


  10. #25010
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    15,649

    Re: Oct 11th vs RAIDERS --- We Be Meeting Up

    [quote user="MattMeyerBud"]WRs which are from like #12 to 30 overall which is a dime a dozen[/quote]

    you mean like RB's?

    your living in the past MMB.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts