Yes or no?
Yes or no?
YOU CAN'T SPELL BELIEVE WITHOUT ELI.
In lieu of a quality replacement - yes. He's reliable.
If only Blair Walshes would just fall out of the sky...
No.
The Giants can do better....Tynes is one of the reasons why the Giants missed the playoffs this season.
The dude can't hit from outside 49 yards.....and it killed us in that loss to Philly.
Considering late season conditions in the Meadowlands, the Giants should logically have one of the strongest kickers in the league....instead, Tynes has one of the weakest legs in the NFL.
"Landry built the 4-3 defense around me. It revolutionized defense and opened the door for all the variations of zones and man-to-man coverage, which are used in conjunction with it today." —Sam Huff
I plan on the Giants to be in many high pressure situations, so I wanted a kicker with no nerves. Tynes is probably a top 5 clutch kicker in the league.
Tynes must work hard... which is a trait that TC loves.
He has gradually increased his kick-off distance. It was poor just 3 years ago, and has improved markedly.
He has been very accurate, despite the misses at the end of the year, which we all always remember.
He has proven that he can make a clutch FG in bad weather.
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
[QUOTE=zimonami;652716]Tynes must work hard... which is a trait that TC loves.
He has gradually increased his kick-off distance. It was poor just 3 years ago, and has improved markedly.
He has been very accurate, despite the misses at the end of the year, which we all always remember.
He has proven that he can make a clutch FG in bad weather.
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.[/QUOTEI'm happy to keep him. The price just has to be right. Not a fan of taking big chances with kickers. Look at what if got us with Dodge.
No one remembers who came in second.
"Landry built the 4-3 defense around me. It revolutionized defense and opened the door for all the variations of zones and man-to-man coverage, which are used in conjunction with it today." —Sam Huff