I don't see how we don't take a look at him. Dude knows how to play aggressive and blitz!!
/end sarcasm
I don't see how we don't take a look at him. Dude knows how to play aggressive and blitz!!
/end sarcasm
Apparently you're supposed to put that in red
we shilacked that team 26-3 fwiw...@SF no less...smh...we shilacked GB too but, wtf, has there ever been a team with such polarity?
too much faith in mathews? thats the only reason i can come up with thats somewhat justifiable. he had to have believed mathews could get to him, before kapernick could get to them?? Otherwise, at least drop 1 of the 4 useless DL he's playing as a spy since they werent even close to getting pressures...
well to be honest, TC wanted Capers. They both have history, at Jax iirc. And to be honest, I think if you gave Capers OUR defensive unit, he'd look much better. He had that D look respectable most of the yr, often with UDFA rookies at corner...
Yeah I still respect him as a coach. Point is on any given Sunday any team / coach can look like a chump
one thing i noticed, slighty off topic but nonetheless, to counteract the option read offense, having 2 bookend DE's is a MUST. SF just kept doing it away from Mathews side and thats when he got those huge runs. I noticed we tended to do a little better vs spread option teams bc we had for the most part 2 bookend DE's, altho once teams figured on how best to attack (vs osi), we didnt do as well, at least imo.
both played. and kapernick came in the 4th and looked just as ****ty as smith did so...u can make any statement u choose and none will make "we shilacked them 26-3 @ SF" untrue...