Funny how anyone would claim that Joe Flacco is mediocre or average.
Funny how anyone would claim that Joe Flacco is mediocre or average.
Okay, this thread is starting to get a little out of hand and i think its time i try my best to bring a little order "logic wise". Now i know there has been a lot of sensitivity on here lately so please don't take anything i say the wrong way. I am not taking shots at anyone here. I'm just calling out where you're wrong. That being said, lets look at the most bizarre statement thus far.
Lets all take a deep breath.... I'm serious. Inhale and exhale slowly. Then take a look at the numbers
Eli: 61.0% completions, 4,949 totals yards, 29 touchdowns. 16 interceptions, 92.9 qb rating
Rodgers: 68.3% completions, 4,900 total yards, 46 touchdowns, 6 interceptions. 122.5 qb rating.
Eli had a heck of a season give him credit. However, the only category where Eli came close to Rodgers in that year, was passing yards. But IF nearing someone in PASSING YARDS Alone means you played around their level then Matthew Stafford and Cam newton are 2 of the best QB's in the league.
And i know there is the argument about the numbers dont tell the whole story and all of that blah blah blah but lets keep it real. Rodgers looked like a grown man playing with kids during the 2011 season. Rodgers had one of the best seasons in NFL history, he was voted by many of the players as not just the best QB of that year but as the best player, and he won MVP.
now I am not going to say you're wrong here. I am just going to give you the benefit of the doubt and say you made an honest mistake. I understand you're trying to defend ELi, and nothing is wrong with that. All i ask is not just you, but we all keep things in a sensible manner. At least make it debatable.
Last edited by Marvelousmik; 02-18-2013 at 10:18 AM.
Don't take it personal, we're just debating.
~Big Mike~
Whoa whoa giants420.
Maybe in the PLAYOFFS Eli outplayed Rodgers, but not the 2011 regular season.
Giants fan since 525 BC.
This brings me to my next point. Here, someone brings up evidence and facts in order to support his claim in the rodgers vs eli in the playoffs debate.
Here is the counter argument to the quoted statement above. i will highlight the facts in bold and type the conclusion in blue.
(Rodgers and The packers offense has averaged better numbers than Eli and the giants offense in the post season. (Fact)
The Giants defense on average has given up a lot less points than the packers defense in the post season. (Fact)
Since Eli has won more playoff games he is better than Rodgers in the post season.)
This is the logic being used in order to counter the quoted argument.
The giants offense scored 20 points against the 49ers in the playoffs and Eli won.
Green bay's offense scored 31 points against the 49ers in the playoffs and Rodgers lost.
Here is the part most of you leave out.
The giants defense gave up 17 points.
The packers defense gave up 45 points.
I think the eli vs peyton, brees and brady in the post season argument is fine. i'm just not convinced that eli plays better than Rodgers in the post season.
Last edited by Marvelousmik; 02-18-2013 at 11:14 AM.
Don't take it personal, we're just debating.
~Big Mike~
The problem is people try to say one QB outplayed another when in fact they don't even play on the same field or against the same defenses. Rodgers is incredible. Nothing he has done has prevented his team from winning. It's not like he threw a pick to end a post season game or just plain played poorly. If his team had a decent defense he win many more Championships.
Last but not least, I think this along with what morehead and buffy discussed about Rodgers in the post season is a great example of why topics tend to go on forever sometimes. just admit that the other person made a good point. show some sportsmanship. I'm here just reading through this thread and watching people straight up get destroyed, yet they're still replying back trying to hold on. And some of it makes no sense what so ever.
Lol its done. just give the person credit if they make a good point. I think it would make discussions a lot more thoughtful and interesting. But that's just me.
And for the record, Not that i really care or anything, but i think edwards exaggerated a bit on the Eli at the kids table comment. In my opinion a coach or former coach shouldn't take a shot at a player. And this is coming from someone who really doesnt care about media stuff.
Last edited by Marvelousmik; 02-18-2013 at 11:45 AM.
Don't take it personal, we're just debating.
~Big Mike~