Why don't the Giants look at Desmond Bryant??

[Rat_bastich]

That picture makes me laugh every time . Its like the Rolando Mcclain pic getting arrested

That picture just has Raiders written all over it....and The First 48.

[B-Red22]

Oh because no Giants have ever been arrested befor!!! Him getting arrested doesn't take away from the fact that he could help the Giants out big time and that he is a very good DT.

There is a difference between being on the giants and getting arrested and getting arrested as a free agent and the giants bringing you in. Not sure how many times the latter has happened

[jomo]

Bryant is a free agent from the Raiders he is 6'6 and 311 lbs. Had 10 sacks I believe last year and is only 27 years old. He could be perfect to replace Canty. Very similar in the way he is built except younger and stronger. Now I don't know what kind of money it would require to get him but he seems to be a very capable DT available on the FA market. I'd much rather have him than Cullen Jenkins.

I don't know much about Bryant but I would say that being 6'6" is a negative quality for a DT. It is hard to gain leverage on the guards and centers who are usually a few inches shorter and wider in stature. The only benefit comes in swatting down passes. It is much more critical to stop the run and height won't help us there.

[GiantNYFan8]

I don't know much about Bryant but I would say that being 6'6" is a negative quality for a DT. It is hard to gain leverage on the guards and centers who are usually a few inches shorter and wider in stature. The only benefit comes in swatting down passes. It is much more critical to stop the run and height won't help us there.

How tall was canty? 6'6?

[jomo]

How tall was canty? 6'6?

That's exactly what he is.

[G-Men Surg.]

Attachment 534

Thats all the " looking " I need. Just say NO!

[bearbryant]

I don't know much about Bryant but I would say that being 6'6" is a negative quality for a DT. It is hard to gain leverage on the guards and centers who are usually a few inches shorter and wider in stature. The only benefit comes in swatting down passes. It is much more critical to stop the run and height won't help us there.

After watching Canty try his hand at DT in a 4-3 you'd think folks would understand why DT's are stout, wide, strong dudes. Not tall, rangey, types like DE's. That was one of the problems with CC he was a 3-4 DE not a 4-3 DT. Pass on Bryant. Next one up!

[gmen0820]

After watching Canty try his hand at DT in a 4-3 you'd think folks would understand why DT's are stout, wide, strong dudes. Not tall, rangey, types like DE's. That was one of the problems with CC he was a 3-4 DE not a 4-3 DT. Pass on Bryant. Next one up!

Canty was excellent when healthy. He beasted in 2011.

[RoanokeFan]

I don't know much about Bryant but I would say that being 6'6" is a negative quality for a DT. It is hard to gain leverage on the guards and centers who are usually a few inches shorter and wider in stature. The only benefit comes in swatting down passes. It is much more critical to stop the run and height won't help us there.

Maybe we could use him at WR to replace Barden?

[JPP=BEASTMODE]

Attachment 534

Lol is it me or does it look like he has down syndrome.