Here is a question

[Rudyy]

Did we need a de when he drafted jpp? BPA is what he drafts

The BPA is not a receiver in this draft class.

[giantsfam04]

The guy is a top 10 talent if he is there at 19 it wouldn't surprise me he takes him

[Rudyy]

The guy is a top 10 talent if he is there at 19 it wouldn't surprise me he takes him

So you're willing to draft a WR just because he's good rather than an area of need like an OL or LB?

[Carter.525]

No.. I say no

[TCHOF]

So you're willing to draft a WR just because he's good rather than an area of need like an OL or LB?

That's kind of the whole point of the BPA philosophy . . . .

[giantsfam04]

So you're willing to draft a WR just because he's good rather than an area of need like an OL or LB?

when was the last time we drafted a lb in the first, I think it was 84 and when was the last time we went ol in the first?

[giantsfam04]

That's kind of the whole point of the BPA philosophy . . . .

thank you

[NYGfanSTRICK]

The kid has crazy skills. He is blazing fast and very elusive. He is 6'3 or something too, if you look at his Tenn tape it reminds me a lot of Peter Warrick when he was in college. Crazy athlete but these guys can really be boom or bust. Who knows maybe JR and company have Patterson rated something like their #3 WR. They do BPA according to their rankings so who knows maybe they have some guy like Brown or Tank extremely high on their list compared to most experts and stuff and they pull the trigger on someone like that at 19. It really is tough to say but it would be a lot of talent to pass up at that spot, that is for sure. I guess it would have to depend on who else was available also.. Interesting thread though!

[Rudyy]

when was the last time we drafted a lb in the first, I think it was 84 and when was the last time we went ol in the first?

Ok but still..

[Rudyy]

That's kind of the whole point of the BPA philosophy . . . .

Well it's not always the best philisophy, because you're not drafting a position of need, but that's just me.