+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 120
  1. #21
    All-Pro Morehead State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Westfield, MA
    Posts
    44,808
    Quote Originally Posted by EJ Blue View Post
    2012 stats
    Defense overall- 31st
    Passing- 28th
    Rushing- 25th

    2009 stats
    Defense overall- 19th
    Passing- 18th
    Rushing- 19th

    Bill Sheridan got fired that season, and he was working with less talent.(ie: CC Brown, Aaron Rouse). It's absurd that you guys don't think there is a personnel issue, whether it be players or Coaching. There's no need for an overhaul, but with numbers like that, it shows that there is work that needs to be done, fact not opinion. I'd think you guys would empathize more with OP's topic. I don't understand why some of you are acclimating yourselves to mediocrity. This defense is not good enough the way it is right now.
    What was our ranking in point against and turnovers created? The two most important stats for a defense.
    Get well soon 80.

  2. #22
    Veteran EJ Blue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    650
    Quote Originally Posted by Morehead State View Post
    What was our ranking in point against and turnovers created? The two most important stats for a defense.
    I didn't bother to look. From memory, I recall us getting blown out by the Saints, then we got blown out more frequently, especially down the stretch in 2009, then by the Panthers game, this defense quit playing football and allowed anything to happen points wise. Whereas the 2012 defense had a MUCH higher turnover ratio which kept us in some games, but they still couldn't stop people from scoring.

  3. #23
    All-Pro Morehead State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Westfield, MA
    Posts
    44,808
    Quote Originally Posted by EJ Blue View Post
    I didn't bother to look. From memory, I recall us getting blown out by the Saints, then we got blown out more frequently, especially down the stretch in 2009, then by the Panthers game, this defense quit playing football and allowed anything to happen points wise. Whereas the 2012 defense had a MUCH higher turnover ratio which kept us in some games, but they still couldn't stop people from scoring.
    Well we were 12th best in points allowed and 3rd in turnovers created.
    Our defense last year, while not great, was far better than the ridiculous "yards per game" rating suggests. We were essentially in the middle of the pack.
    Get well soon 80.

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Morehead State View Post
    Well we were 12th best in points allowed and 3rd in turnovers created.
    Our defense last year, while not great, was far better than the ridiculous "yards per game" rating suggests. We were essentially in the middle of the pack.

    Points per drive is the ultimate evaluator. It basically states how often a team can score on you when they have the ball. So that covers your turnover stats and scoring defense. The Giants were 19th in that department since they only had 170 drives against that defense (lowest in the league). They were also ranked 20th in TDs allowed per drive. It basically menas that they let teams control the game and the clock by not being able to force them off the field.

    Face facts the Bucaneers, Bengals Ravens and Falcons destroyed them. Even in close games anytime they were counted on to make a big stop they folded like a cheap tent.

    The offense who everybody wants to "run the ball more" was ranked 2nd in points per drive and 5th in yards per drive but was only given 169 drives all year long because this awful defense couldn't get anyone off the field. How about leave well enough alone ?

    The cold hard truth is that this defense was pathetic and the fact that Fewell still has a job is a joke.The Giants spent more on defensive cap sapce than anyone but the Jets. Sheridan's defense was better all around and they quit on him. The clowns that compare Fewell to Spagnuolo are delusional.

    As far as I am concerned this defense is a bottom feeder that should have been scrapped and rebuilt this year

  5. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by BlueBlooded1979 View Post
    Points per drive is the ultimate evaluator. It basically states how often a team can score on you when they have the ball. So that covers your turnover stats and scoring defense. The Giants were 19th in that department since they only had 170 drives against that defense (lowest in the league). They were also ranked 20th in TDs allowed per drive. It basically menas that they let teams control the game and the clock by not being able to force them off the field.

    Face facts the Bucaneers, Bengals Ravens and Falcons destroyed them. Even in close games anytime they were counted on to make a big stop they folded like a cheap tent.

    The offense who everybody wants to "run the ball more" was ranked 2nd in points per drive and 5th in yards per drive but was only given 169 drives all year long because this awful defense couldn't get anyone off the field. How about leave well enough alone ?

    The cold hard truth is that this defense was pathetic and the fact that Fewell still has a job is a joke.The Giants spent more on defensive cap sapce than anyone but the Jets. Sheridan's defense was better all around and they quit on him. The clowns that compare Fewell to Spagnuolo are delusional.

    As far as I am concerned this defense is a bottom feeder that should have been scrapped and rebuilt this year
    i think the bucs game, ya know when we finally took the lead late and the D let TB walk down the field in succeeding drives in like 3 plays, that the reality of the situation hit home. we all know im a big homer, i couldnt even really convince myself of our D ability after that 1. and that was the story the rest of the year, big play TD after big play TD, sometimes the O was able to keep a lead sometimes we were blown out...

    but i agree, some here claim the D did its job and it was the O who is more to blame or even more comical, the assertion the D struggled because of the O....the D was PUTRID the majority of the season with maybe a few AT MOST quality performances...9ers game, GB game...Carolina game, and really the O was more dominant if anythng which helped the D out...

    Im excited and think Kiwi to DE will be part of the solution. A.Brown in rd 2 would g a long way too imo

  6. #26
    and, what really scares me, is our record w/o KP...thought last yrs D was terrible??? It was its worst when we didn have KP...

  7. #27
    CB scares me the most, and without a stud DT more getting run on all day like welcome mats... If things play out draft day how they do in my head we can be right back in the thick of it, but we can all dream cant we? Jerry Reese knows what he is doing, two rings should display his technique is effective. I would counter my own point and say that I pray we get some impact playmaking lb's and ballhawking cb;s in the draft...

  8. #28
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    9,991
    It should worry everyone. They have one reliable DE, one reliable DT, one reliable CB, a couple of promising Safeties, and a patch work group of LB's.

  9. #29
    Moderator RoanokeFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    102,295
    Quote Originally Posted by nhpgiantsfan View Post
    The holes are plugged but they are not plugged with good talent. CWebb, Stevie, Hosley, Tuck, Jenkins, Kiwi, and the entire LB unit, are all question marks.

    I guess I just should've said the only guys that we can have any confidence in is JPP, Prince, and Linval.
    Shouldn't we wait to see how they play?
    “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1






    # 80

  10. #30
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    9,991
    Quote Originally Posted by EJ Blue View Post
    I didn't bother to look. From memory, I recall us getting blown out by the Saints, then we got blown out more frequently, especially down the stretch in 2009, then by the Panthers game, this defense quit playing football and allowed anything to happen points wise. Whereas the 2012 defense had a MUCH higher turnover ratio which kept us in some games, but they still couldn't stop people from scoring.
    They actually where ranked 12th in points against so they didn't just get scored on at will. The last two losses of the season throw those stats up a bit and the entire team did not show up in those games so the offense needs to eat it too. A lot of those points where set up by offensive TO's as well. No, they where not a great unit last year and might be even worse this year, but those rankings are based on YPG and the difference between the 31st defense and the 10th defense was 50 yards a game.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts