+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 98
  1. #1

    Dan Connor vs Karlos Dansby

    Age difference aside, wonder why they passed on Dansby. View him as a plug & play starter for 1-2 years while a draft pick develops. Would probably lead team in tackles & provide much needed veteran leadership while Tuck shrugs his shouders & lacks emotion.

  2. #2
    All-Pro slipknottin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    37,572
    $$$

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by slipknottin View Post
    $$$
    Actually I was thinking it was more like $$$$

  4. #4
    Starter
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    449
    Money money moneyyyy...... Dansby would be an amazing pick up but to expensive. We never have money for a good line backer

  5. #5
    He might be had on the cheap after the draft.

  6. #6
    Veteran myles2424's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Tampa
    Posts
    4,555
    Quote Originally Posted by Kruunch View Post
    He might be had on the cheap after the draft.
    Every year we find reasons to not actually get long term solutions at LB....enough Is enough

  7. #7
    All-Pro TCHOF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    6,196
    Quote Originally Posted by myles2424 View Post
    Every year we find reasons to not actually get long term solutions at LB....enough Is enough
    except that one reason is that we've won a SB without long terms solutions at LB

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by TCHOF View Post
    except that one reason is that we've won a SB without long terms solutions at LB
    And that's pretty much why.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by TCHOF View Post
    except that one reason is that we've won a SB without long terms solutions at LB
    Doesn't mean its the right thing.

  10. #10
    Veteran myles2424's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Tampa
    Posts
    4,555
    Quote Originally Posted by TCHOF View Post
    except that one reason is that we've won a SB without long terms solutions at LB
    That's a moronic argument to not have any decent lbs...we also won our last one with a suspect running game/ defense...so is that not important either?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts