+ Reply to Thread
Page 18 of 27 FirstFirst ... 81617181920 ... LastLast
Results 171 to 180 of 264

Thread: This is what separates Victor Cruz from Wes Welker

  1. #171
    Quote Originally Posted by RoanokeFan View Post
    I seem to recall a very talented RB named Tiki Barber who was a fumbling machine learning to not be one through coaching.

    Call me the eternal optimist, but I believe people can learn and improve. Cruz has had pretty good positive numbers for the two years he's played. He has been Eli's most productive receiver. Imagine if he can cut his drops in half?

    Not uncoachable with the qualifier "per se" = uncoachable
    pretty good? cruz's 2 yr statistical output is amazing when really studied. i think most of us, I know I did, kinda forgot/dismissed just how much success he has had from a statistical viewpoint. Now I know the merits of stats and their importance can be debated for eternity. I merely mean in a "compare Cruz's numbers to other wr's in the league and see who he stacks up against", not in a how the stats were achieved mindset, but just solely the #s...damn impressive, doubt we see another 2 yrs like that from a giants wr ever again...

  2. #172
    All-Pro Drez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    14,614
    Quote Originally Posted by giantsfan420 View Post
    are u discussing cruz's drops? bc thats an inaccurate statement imo if it is. most of cruz's drops, the ball actually gets onto cruz's body and bounces off. when the ball hit his hands, he almost always is holding on.

    and the reason, or part of the reason ( i dont dispute ur comments/points about why, just the how of the drops) is bc he focuses his concentration on the defender from the ball too early. he'll look off looking the ball in to look upfield (or whichever direction depending on defender and location of pass)....
    No, that was in reference to Tiki's fumbles. A good number of Cruz' drops are simple lapses of focus where he tries making a move before securing the ball.

  3. #173
    Quote Originally Posted by Drez View Post
    No, that was in reference to Tiki's fumbles. A good number of Cruz' drops are simple lapses of focus where he tries making a move before securing the ball.
    ok. i thought i jumped in without understanding ur exact premise. my bad.

  4. #174
    Moderator RoanokeFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    102,285
    Quote Originally Posted by giantsfan420 View Post
    pretty good? cruz's 2 yr statistical output is amazing when really studied. i think most of us, I know I did, kinda forgot/dismissed just how much success he has had from a statistical viewpoint. Now I know the merits of stats and their importance can be debated for eternity. I merely mean in a "compare Cruz's numbers to other wr's in the league and see who he stacks up against", not in a how the stats were achieved mindset, but just solely the #s...damn impressive, doubt we see another 2 yrs like that from a giants wr ever again...
    I understate most of the time
    “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1






    # 80

  5. #175
    All-Pro Drez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    14,614
    Quote Originally Posted by giantsfan420 View Post
    ok. i thought i jumped in without understanding ur exact premise. my bad.
    It's all good. At least you asked if I was talking about Cruz or not.
    Last edited by Drez; 04-09-2013 at 10:35 PM.

  6. #176
    All-Pro JJC7301's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    5,324
    I think that Cruz has better big-playmaking ability, but Welker is an awesome slot receiver as well. I would have been happy with Wes for 2 years if the Giants had signed him thinking that they can't keep Cruz long term.

  7. #177
    Quote Originally Posted by JJC7301 View Post
    I think that Cruz has better big-playmaking ability, but Welker is an awesome slot receiver as well. I would have been happy with Wes for 2 years if the Giants had signed him thinking that they can't keep Cruz long term.
    So cruz came into the league older then most, so I guess he figures this is is one and only shot at a payday. If he signs a 3 or 4 year deal, he is not going to get a second big one in this 30s. Welker has had solid seasons season after season, he would be great on the giants because the giants are a team about execution. I think Welker would be like steve smith, mr 3rd down. Cruz is not really a reliable move the chains third down target, he is more of a hybrid deep threat home run hitter. In that regard I think we would be better with welker from a consistency standpoint.

    Cruz just wants to much money, he had a 1000 yard season, it would be a mistake to tie up all this money in him. If he gets injured we are toast.

  8. #178
    Moderator RoanokeFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    102,285
    Quote Originally Posted by appodictic View Post
    So cruz came into the league older then most, so I guess he figures this is is one and only shot at a payday. If he signs a 3 or 4 year deal, he is not going to get a second big one in this 30s. Welker has had solid seasons season after season, he would be great on the giants because the giants are a team about execution. I think Welker would be like steve smith, mr 3rd down. Cruz is not really a reliable move the chains third down target, he is more of a hybrid deep threat home run hitter. In that regard I think we would be better with welker from a consistency standpoint.

    Cruz just wants to much money, he had a 1000 yard season, it would be a mistake to tie up all this money in him. If he gets injured we are toast.
    How about we let Jerry Reese worry about what's "too much" since we don't have a clue.
    “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1






    # 80

  9. #179
    All-Pro TCHOF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    6,776
    Quote Originally Posted by Drez View Post
    Not that he's uncoachable, per se, but just prone to lapses in focus.
    Eh, I don't think that his drops are due to a lack of focus . . . . more likely a focus on where he's going to run after the catch instead of focusing on just making the catch. To me, that's different than a "lack of focus". More like just focusing on the wrong thing for a split second.
    Last edited by TCHOF; 04-10-2013 at 07:56 AM.

  10. #180
    Moderator RoanokeFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    102,285
    Quote Originally Posted by TCHOF View Post
    Eh, I don't think that his drops are due to a lack of focus . . . . more likely a focus on where he's going to run after the catch instead of focusing on just making the catch. To me, that's different than a "lack of focus"
    I think he uses that split second look to see where he needs to shift, juke, etc.and sometimes that's enough to "lose the ball." It is a problem he needs to address, but with all of his drops, he's still been Eli's most productive receiver for two years now.
    “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1






    # 80

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts