Would you rather have a SB win this year or Spags next year as DC?

[DragonSoul]

If we win a SB I doubt Fewell will be let go.

I rather win the SB then have Sags next year, as you never know what can/will/might happen.

If the team doesn't play well on defense vs Dallas or if we make it to the playoffs and they stink or just skate by, then i want Fewell gone.

Only way I would even remotely consider Fewell again is if the Defense really shows marked improvement in the playoffs, and/or we win a SB with a solid defense.

Otherwise Spags needs to be the man. Playoff run or not.

[MattMeyerBud]

superbowl. IF somebody told you mid 2007 u can win the superbowl this year but then have garbage years for the next 3 years, would you take it?

I would

If your telling me if i'd rather have a DC or 2nd ring in 5 years - its a no brainer

[Tommy_Ribs]

You take the SB - Obviously.

Then you go from there, but if you can win a SB you take it every time.

[TheReal_LT]

without a doubt the Super Bowl

[FBomb]

hmmmm........gee, that's a tough one.[]</P>


</P>

[Firenugget]

lol silly question.

[JJC7301]

A SB, of course. Which would mean that Fewell actually did a good job and we wouldn't even be talking about Spags. But this isn't going to happen, so lets get Spags.

[MikeIsaGiant]

To win a SB it takes a good team to win it?

So why would we let go of Perry?

This is hypothetical of course.

[MikeIsaGiant]

To win a SB it takes a good team to win it?

So why would we let go of Perry?

This is hypothetical of course.

[DemandedAce]

Superbowl easily. I liked Spags a LOT, but I want fresh faces for the players. I like the DC from Cincy a lot and if TC "retires" we should look into him as the HC and DC combined, look what he has done for their defense.

Zimmer is my choice, but Superbowl above all else. I love Gruden too but sources say he's a highly unlikely candidate anywhere this offseason.