+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Plax vs "H"icks

  1. #1

    Plax vs "H"icks

    I never start threads here, but I'll make it my first because I found it hilarious of a thread started earlier.

    In today's world, who would you take, Nicks or Plax?

    Come on guys, this is a tough question.

    I'll say Nicks

  2. #2
    Hall of Famer MattMeyerBud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    60,564

    Re: Plax vs "H"icks

    in what ways do u think its tough? I think even Jet fans would say its a no brainer
    Fear the name, appreciate the game

  3. #3

    Re: Plax vs "H"icks

    This thread was created because of one thread that stated Plax over Nicks is a better choice, so I am asking the GMB who they all think would be the better choice.

    I don't have the sarcasm font color on this computer otherwise I would do it, but yano, it ain't tough

  4. #4

    Re: Plax vs "H"icks

    Why are people still talking about Plax? He's a dog on a dog team. Let it go.

  5. #5
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    2,097

    Re: Plax vs "H"icks

    Right now nicks hands Down- I would argue nicks is already better then plax ever was- plax never caught as many balls as Hakeem in his second year alone- still right now plax has 41 recs to Hakeem's 71 500 yards to Hakeem's 1000 it's not even close- say Sanchez is the factor but Keller and santonio have more recs and yards on his own team- plax is gettin old Hakeem is coming Into his prime

  6. #6
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    2,097

    Re: Plax vs "H"icks

    If you're wondering why this is a thread you can check out an earlier thread about reggie Wayne where the op and poster no
    Huddle make the astoundingly odd and shocking claim
    They'd rather have plax right now then hakeem
    And while the stats are insanely in Hakeem's favor apparently thats all on Sanchez despite better wideouts having great years with worse qbs and despite Holmes and Keller having better years on his own team despite Holmes drawing coverage not plax

  7. #7
    All-Pro DragonSoul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    11,246

    Re: Plax vs "H"icks

    [quote user="MikeIsaGiant"]I never start threads here, but I'll make it my first because I found it hilarious of a thread started earlier.

    In today's world, who would you take, Nicks or Plax?

    Come on guys, this is a tough question.

    I'll say Nicks[/quote]Really tough question? I hope that was sarcasm.

    Obviously Nicks. While he has been injury prone, so has Plax.

    Nicks is also a true professional, and does not cause the franchise, TC nor his QB any problems.

    He has also shown he is a top tier WR, and can run any route, and do whatever is required of him, by the coaching staff/QB.
    Peace,
    DragonSoul



    Twitter Account! https://twitter.com/DragonSoul

  8. #8
    All-Pro Roosevelt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Del Boca Vista
    Posts
    16,612

    Re: Plax vs "H"icks

    Plax was our offensive MVP in 2007.

    But that was then and this is now.

    Nicks.
    http://boards.giants.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=25347&dateline=138526  4905
    Get well, get back #80

  9. #9

    Re: Plax vs "H"icks

    I'll take a 45 year old Randy Moss instead.

    This team really lacks a veteran above 40 and a headcase of this magnitude.

  10. #10

    Re: Plax vs "H"icks

    Nicks.
    80

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts