+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: I would trade down ... get more picks since we have more than 1 need RT-DE-CB-S, etc.

  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Redeyejedi View Post
    I think Pass rusher is a definitive need the Giants couldnt get to the QB last year. The Giants won 2 Super Bowls with different offenses the only constant was having a rotation of elite DE's. Those DE's have gotten old. If they want to get this defense going again they must add another pass rusher. This is more about next year 2. I would go up and get Mingo if it was up to me.
    I tend to agree.

    However, Mingo? Seems like trying to put a square peg in a round hole to me.

  2. #22
    All-Pro G-Men Surg.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Down south In Cowturd country
    Quote Originally Posted by G-Men Surg. View Post
    Lots of possibilities that's for sure with one extra pick.
    That been said ,
    I see more potential in a trading partner with the Vicks but obviously the value in return would be less.
    " Success is never final, but failure can be " B.P.

  3. #23
    Any Idea who we could trade with? I heard some talks about teams trading their 2nd rd pick to move up or Barkley. Maybe someone like a Jacksonville?

    Quote Originally Posted by Giantamy View Post
    these guys should be available for us when we pick at 19:

    Damontre Moore DE
    Jarvis Jones OLB
    Johnathan Hankins DT
    Dion Jordan 3-4 OLB
    Manti Te'o MLB
    Eric Reid S
    Xavier Rhodes CB
    Alec Ogletree OLB
    Datone Jones DE
    D.J. Fluker RT
    Tyler Eifert TE
    Cornelius Carradine DE

    why get 1 of those at 19 when we can get 2 of them (maybe 3 after 2 rounds with a trade down)?

    Our needs:
    T- the 3 best tackles will be out before our pick. The value for a T will not be there at 19 (round 2 Pugh, Watson possibilities)
    CB- Outside Xavier Rhodes, the value will not be there at 19 for CB (plus the draft is deep at CB) Round 3-4
    MLB- no value at ALL at 19... at pick 25+ yes Te'o or Minter.
    DE- Moore at 19 nah... Carradine nah... Jones nah...

    without a trade down I would pick Xavier Rhodes
    with a trade down I would get BPA at those positions (DE-CB-T-LB)

  4. #24
    All-Pro nycsportzfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Pittsfield, MA
    Quote Originally Posted by Kruunch View Post
    I tend to agree.

    However, Mingo? Seems like trying to put a square peg in a round hole to me.
    Holy cr-ap, we agree!!!!lol

  5. #25
    I agree...unless somebody like Mingo, Ansah, or Fisher falls into our laps I think we absolutely should. The problem is Reese does not like to trade picks on draft day for some reason, I am sure there is a method to it but you never know.

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by nycsportzfan View Post
    Holy cr-ap, we agree!!!!lol
    I feel the same way.

    These forums may explode.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    None of those are "needs" except RT

    DE, CB, and S aren't "needs"

    A "need" is an obvious hole and/or glaring lack of depth at that position.

    DE - JPP, Tuck, Kiwi, Ojomo, Tracy
    CB - Prince, Webster, Hosley, Ross, Thomas
    S - Rolle, Brown, Hill, Sash, Thomas

    No glaring holes or lack of depth at any of those 3 positions.

    Would we like to improve in all 3 areas? Of course. But that doesn't mean it's a "need". Under that logic, every single position on the team outside of QB is a "need"

    Last edited by EliManningUp; 04-20-2013 at 01:55 AM.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts