+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24
  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by ELI_HOF_NYG View Post
    fluker is atrocious against the run and has terrible footwork,,we can get a guy like him in the later rounds,dont let the fact that he played for alabama cloud your head.
    I disagre


    I have said Fluker isn't my favorite choice. But, anyone knocking his run blocking hasn't seen him play.
    Last edited by BlueSanta; 04-22-2013 at 03:48 AM.

  2. #22
    Why do i sense some very unhappy Giants Fans if they select Fluker in the first..Would kinda remind me of the Luke Pettigout pick in the first from ND.

  3. #23
    All-Pro G-Men Surg.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Down south In Cowturd country
    Posts
    10,655
    Quote Originally Posted by slipknottin View Post
    Diehl was as good a player as tuck or webster last season
    I do also think they played " fairly " good last season but I very well could see Reese drafting the next RT, CB or DE of the future for that matter. That fact they played well or not has nothing to do with what Reese decides in draft day and if you consider David Deihl, Webster and Tuck are playing out their contracts Reese probably could pull the trigger if some stud player is available even if is not a need at this moment ( this year ).
    " Success is never final, but failure can be " B.P.

  4. #24
    All-Pro Captain Chaos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Alexandria, Va
    Posts
    10,682
    Quote Originally Posted by slipknottin View Post
    He still has his RT starter from last year, and has drafted three OTs to compete for that job.
    Exactly! You are assuming that Brewer and company are not ready to compete with Diehl for the starting job, I think we may be surprised....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts