+ Reply to Thread
Page 51 of 285 FirstFirst ... 41495051525361101151 ... LastLast
Results 501 to 510 of 2845

Thread: GMB FF League

  1. #501
    All-Pro Moke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    12,259
    I'm fine with that considering my team is pretty awful!!

  2. #502
    All-Pro Morehead State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Westfield, MA
    Posts
    44,809
    Quote Originally Posted by gmen0820 View Post
    How does it favor poorer players? Do you mean poorer teams?
    First of all where does this decision come from? Its bull****.
    Secondly, it favors bad players because it takes away the ability to use your knowledge to pick up free agents when they can help your team.
    What are we going to have....19 friggin players on a team?

    Its crap.
    Get well soon 80.

  3. #503
    All-Pro Morehead State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Westfield, MA
    Posts
    44,809
    Quote Originally Posted by Moke View Post
    I'm fine with that considering my team is pretty awful!!
    Then you deserve to struggle. If you can't draft well, you should pay the price.
    Get well soon 80.

  4. #504
    All-Pro Moke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    12,259
    Quote Originally Posted by Morehead State View Post
    Then you deserve to struggle. If you can't draft well, you should pay the price.
    I never disagreed lol

    I admit I had an awful draft. I didn't like any of the RBs at the #9 pick so I got screwed with RBs.

  5. #505
    All-Pro Morehead State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Westfield, MA
    Posts
    44,809
    Quote Originally Posted by gmen0820 View Post
    How does it favor poorer players? Do you mean poorer teams?
    there are 12 players in this league. 12 managers. This bullsht rule favors the poorer managers.
    Get well soon 80.

  6. #506
    All-Pro Moke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    12,259
    Quote Originally Posted by Morehead State View Post
    there are 12 players in this league. 12 managers. This bullsht rule favors the poorer managers.
    I think you're getting a little upset though.

    It's not a ****ing money league

  7. #507
    All-Pro Morehead State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Westfield, MA
    Posts
    44,809
    Quote Originally Posted by Moke View Post
    I never disagreed lol

    I admit I had an awful draft. I didn't like any of the RBs at the #9 pick so I got screwed with RBs.
    Nothing wrong with the #9 spot. The great thing about a late pick is you can pick up a really good RB/WR and then get a great QB.
    Get well soon 80.

  8. #508
    All-Pro gmen0820's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Audubon, New Jersey
    Posts
    19,284
    Quote Originally Posted by Moke View Post
    I still don't get the ****ing rule. I just saw 4 more extra players and I am picking up a few players.

    If that ruins it for me in t he future, **** it... the rule was implemented just recently?
    Nothing ruins anything for you in the future. It's just a way to add a couple more players to your bench without having to outright cut other players on your team.


    Quote Originally Posted by Morehead State View Post
    I don't get this 4 more players nonsense. I'm supposed give give up my primo waiver position to get scrubs. BUT not be able to pick up players because they are all picked clean?
    You're not giving up any waiver position to get scrubs. You don't have to put in any waiver claims at all. The waivers were only put in so that when the bench is expanded, people couldn't go out that second and pick up whoever they wanted. As soon as the waiver period passes (tomorrow), you'll be free to pick anyone up without effecting your waiver position.

    Quote Originally Posted by Morehead State View Post
    This is bull****. You can't change the rules of the league after its started. We had the draft...the rosters are what they are. Changing the friggin rules is absolute bull****.
    I'm not changing any major rules, such as scoring. The benches were small, and the teams are generally thin. I expanded the bench by four slots to provide more flexibility and activity. If you don't need the additional players, then there's no need to add any, but there's no downside to it.

  9. #509
    All-Pro Morehead State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Westfield, MA
    Posts
    44,809
    Quote Originally Posted by Moke View Post
    I think you're getting a little upset though.

    It's not a ****ing money league
    If it was...I would have quit. Its competition. If you don't give a **** about it, I'd rather you not be in the league.
    I want to be in a league where everyone tries hard.
    Get well soon 80.

  10. #510
    All-Pro TCHOF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    6,196
    Quote Originally Posted by Morehead State View Post
    First of all where does this decision come from? Its bull****.
    Secondly, it favors bad players because it takes away the ability to use your knowledge to pick up free agents when they can help your team.
    What are we going to have....19 friggin players on a team?

    Its crap.
    I'll go with the concensus, but I am personally against expanding the benches. Part of the skill of fantasy football is juggling the free agent process with limited bench space. Also, it softens the blow of a bad or marginal draft

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts