+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 34 FirstFirst ... 67891018 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 338
  1. #71
    Starter Shimmy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Schenectady, NY
    Posts
    426
    Yea because all that means something when we're getting blown out by at least two scores a game.

    I love it. Absolutely love it. It's like NY Knicks fans that say "Yo although we lost 110-112 to the Nets, at least Carmelo had 59 points, 11 Reb, and 10 Asts! What a Beast! He's on pace for 4,100 points this seaosn!!"

    What do all those stats matter if it's in a loss? It doesn't. Tony Romo had 500 yds and 5 TDs last night, but it means absolutely **** unless you're a fantasy owner.

  2. #72
    Lets trade Nicks so we can draft another receiver in the first round and hope he can be as good as Nicks.

  3. #73
    Quote Originally Posted by Shimmy View Post
    Yea because all that means something when we're getting blown out by at least two scores a game.

    I love it. Absolutely love it. It's like NY Knicks fans that say "Yo although we lost 110-112 to the Nets, at least Carmelo had 59 points, 11 Reb, and 10 Asts! What a Beast! He's on pace for 4,100 points this seaosn!!"

    What do all those stats matter if it's in a loss? It doesn't. Tony Romo had 500 yds and 5 TDs last night, but it means absolutely **** unless you're a fantasy owner.
    We dont have many good players what logic is there to trade 1 of the few one's we have away for a pick they may not pan out

  4. #74
    Quote Originally Posted by TroyArcher View Post
    3rd round pick for Nicks, Are you joking? He is one of the best WR in the NFL.
    Not to mention we would get a 3rd round comp pick if he leaves in FA anyway

  5. #75
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAnalyst View Post
    Yeah, by trading Nicks for picks or an OL. I said that because Nicks contract will strap us for money again and we wont have $$$ to sign OLmen. OL is more important then a WR, especially when we have Cruz and Randle.
    We have spent a ton of money on Oljne we just need to replace the players that are done like Snee and Baas with good players. U guys act like we arent using rescources there but we are. We have have the 8th most expensive line in the NFL. Once we cut Snee thats 8 million dollars that can be used on replacement guard. U draft a Center or Guard at the top of round 2 , U will probably get the 2nd or 3rd best interior lineman in the draft at that spot. Now u have to live with Baas or Boothe for 1 more season until Baas can be cut.
    Last edited by Redeyejedi; 10-07-2013 at 09:54 AM.

  6. #76
    All-Pro slipknottin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    39,596
    Quote Originally Posted by Shimmy View Post
    Yea because all that means something when we're getting blown out by at least two scores a game.

    I love it. Absolutely love it. It's like NY Knicks fans that say "Yo although we lost 110-112 to the Nets, at least Carmelo had 59 points, 11 Reb, and 10 Asts! What a Beast! He's on pace for 4,100 points this seaosn!!"

    What do all those stats matter if it's in a loss? It doesn't. Tony Romo had 500 yds and 5 TDs last night, but it means absolutely **** unless you're a fantasy owner.
    It does matter. It means he played well.

    There are another 50 something players who also have to do their jobs.

    Romo played great yesterday. It's not his fault his defense allowed 51 points.

  7. #77
    Starter Shimmy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Schenectady, NY
    Posts
    426
    Jernigan and Randle were showing they could ball plenty. I mean Jernigan should, right? He's been on the roster for a few years now. Why keep Nicks around to showboat for these 100-yd games that don't matter, when we can use him as value to start re-building the OL or LB core? Makes no sense to keep him around to build pointless stats, especially when he's not mentally in the game anymore. He quits. He's like a 10 year old not getting his way in a Pop Warner game.

  8. #78
    All-Pro slipknottin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    39,596
    Quote Originally Posted by Shimmy View Post
    Jernigan and Randle were showing they could ball plenty. I mean Jernigan should, right? He's been on the roster for a few years now. Why keep Nicks around to showboat for these 100-yd games that don't matter, when we can use him as value to start re-building the OL or LB core? Makes no sense to keep him around to build pointless stats, especially when he's not mentally in the game anymore. He quits. He's like a 10 year old not getting his way in a Pop Warner game.
    Jernigan and Randle? Didn't they also get pointless stats yesterday?

    Trade Cruz then too. He's getting pointless stats as well.

  9. #79
    Moderator RoanokeFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    104,139
    Quote Originally Posted by Shimmy View Post
    Jernigan and Randle were showing they could ball plenty. I mean Jernigan should, right? He's been on the roster for a few years now. Why keep Nicks around to showboat for these 100-yd games that don't matter, when we can use him as value to start re-building the OL or LB core? Makes no sense to keep him around to build pointless stats, especially when he's not mentally in the game anymore. He quits. He's like a 10 year old not getting his way in a Pop Warner game.

    Neither of them is on Nicks' level right now. You point out Nicks' drops but say nothing a bout Randle's in the same game?
    “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1






    # 80

  10. #80
    Quote Originally Posted by Redeyejedi View Post
    Lets trade Nicks so we can draft another receiver in the first round and hope he can be as good as Nicks.
    ^^^^^^^
    "...gently down the loser stream!!"

    --80--

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts