Both, why not run a two fb set on passing downs? Can't be much worse than our current offensive line.
There must be more to Hynoski's injury as they have signed Connor for 2 years. Sad as Hynoski was a beast!
both offer diff things.
connor has more size and power. but, he isnt as agile. he also isnt the pass catching option Hyno is. But, he is a serious serious bruiser. Hyno is as well, but he doesnt pack the same punch as Conner. really, the run game has blossomed when either or was in. so, really, we're in a good spot re: the FB position.
hyno is coming off injury. i let both compete, but, imo, Conner would win out unless he got hurt himself before next year. Hyno's also younger. ill also add this, when hyno was playing his best, he was a comparable level to Conner. But that was at his best. its really a tough decision bc we had success with both. do u go with the more powerful guy, or the guy who still has power, just less of it but also has other aspects that he is superior in.
"Measure Twice......Cut Once"
You couldn't be more full of **** if you were break dancing in a Port-a-Potty.......Kruunch
So far, Hynoski has only been around for 3 years and has more receiving yards. Conner has more rushing yards. However, Conner is built like a bowling ball and seems to hit people clean, square and with a lot of force. Hynoski looks like he glances people at times and stumbles.