+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: Um...RYAN Grant

  1. #1
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    4,739

    Um...RYAN Grant

    Does this mean we win?

  2. #2
    Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,539

    Re: Um...RYAN Grant

    [quote user="Pakman"]Does this mean we win?[/quote]

    Well hopefully that's not the pattern, because if it is we would hit a wall after next week anyway.

  3. #3
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    4,739

    Re: Um...RYAN Grant

    Saints:

    AdRIAN Arrington

    49ers:

    bRIAN Jennings

    #SuperbowlBound lol

  4. #4

    Re: Um...RYAN Grant



    [quote user="Pakman"]Does this mean we win?[/quote]




    Took me a second to see what you were getting at... but yes, this means we win.




    Awesome.

    80

  5. #5
    All-Pro egyptian420's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    11,590

    Re: Um...RYAN Grant

    [quote user="Pakman"]Saints:

    AdRIAN Arrington

    49ers:

    bRIAN Jennings

    #SuperbowlBound lol[/quote]
    lol you're trying too hard bro

  6. #6
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    997

    Re: Um...RYAN Grant

    [quote user="Pakman"]Saints:

    AdRIAN Arrington

    49ers:

    bRIAN Jennings

    #SuperbowlBound lol[/quote]Too bad we couldn't beat Ryan Kerrigan.

  7. #7
    Bench Player
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    18

    Re: Um...RYAN Grant

    You all recall that we snagged him from the Giants, right? If Starks can go, they represent a good 1-2 punch, even though Bradshaw & Jacobs get all the pub (and rightfully so).

  8. #8

    Re: Um...RYAN Grant



    [quote user="barrister"]You all recall that we snagged him from the Giants, right? If Starks can go, they represent a good 1-2 punch, even though Bradshaw & Jacobs get all the pub (and rightfully so).[/quote]




    I'm sure most are aware here, and probably would have no issues with GB wanting to run the ball more.

    80

  9. #9
    Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,539

    Re: Um...RYAN Grant

    [quote user="barrister"]You all recall that we snagged him from the Giants, right? If Starks can go, they represent a good 1-2 punch, even though Bradshaw & Jacobs get all the pub (and rightfully so).[/quote]

    What we're getting at is we have a winning streak against guys named Ryan (Rex, Rob, Matt).

    But yeah that sucked letting him walk. We have a history of finding awesome undrafted players and then letting them go (see Wake, Cameron). Sure as hell won't happen with Cruz though.

  10. #10
    All-Pro egyptian420's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    11,590

    Re: Um...RYAN Grant

    [quote user="jhamburg"][quote user="barrister"]You all recall that we snagged him from the Giants, right? If Starks can go, they represent a good 1-2 punch, even though Bradshaw & Jacobs get all the pub (and rightfully so).[/quote]

    What we're getting at is we have a winning streak against guys named Ryan (Rex, Rob, Matt).

    But yeah that sucked letting him walk. We have a history of finding awesome undrafted players and then letting them go (see Wake, Cameron). Sure as hell won't happen with Cruz though.[/quote]
    Add Visanthe Shiancoe to that list

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts