"Measure Twice......Cut Once"
You couldn't be more full of **** if you were break dancing in a Port-a-Potty.......Kruunch
Happy for you that you could find one lost soul who agrees with you though (another who has demonstrated his vast football knowledge in the past lol) and btw I don't expect our line to be spectacular but with a new center thrown in the mix I expect them to be serviceable, our receivers right now look like flat out poop (they were ATTROCIOUS last year and weve done nothing except lose nicks) but for arguments sake lets say they're average. I'd rather have a group of game breaking wideouts and an slightly sub par Oline than the other way around (not that we're gonna have a top teir Oline no matter what we do at this point) again see 2012
Oh I forgot mr 600 yds, 6 tds, 8 picks, and god knows how many drops.. is the second coming lol duh how can I not consider his legend solidified with those gaudy numbers, and you know you've still yet to back your arguments with anything you've SEEN from him, which leads me to question your true knowledge of football and classify you as a stat nerd who's never played the game
If youre gonna stroke him all day long atleast detail some of the things you think he does well, as opposed to just repeating "but 600yds and 6tds!!!" as if that means anything at all
Last edited by Mookskingdom; 04-30-2014 at 02:34 PM.
There have been plenty of teams with good OL's and mediocre receiver groups that have won super bowls. That's easy for you to verify.
And you actually believe rumors that the Giants will trade up for Evans? That's hilarious! That is not the Giants MO, and with the many weaknesses on this Giants team they should trade down and get an extra 2nd/3rd rounder. Trading up and giving up a 2nd/3rd rounder for Evans is foolish and no way happens.
And you're still the only person I've seen who has called getting Evans/Niklas in the first 2 rounds a "waste" I bet atleast 80% of these boards would sign up for that in a heartbeat, if anything it may be wishful thinking on my part, do you even realize the impact each of them would have on our passing AND running game? But I'm guessing you didn't take into account a WR and a TE who can block will go a long way in compensating for a sub par Oline (sorry bro that's the best were gonna get, idk what you think we can turn our Oline into over night)
Last edited by Mookskingdom; 04-30-2014 at 03:02 PM.
Don't forget about his awful concentration on the deep ball and inconsistent hands, other than that he doesn't have a whole lot of issues to pick apart, just those glaring ones. He has a good release, the nuggets to catch the ball in traffic (though he doesnt always do it) good athleticism with the speed to separate and the leaping ability to go get the ball, he has all the physical tools (which is why people like you fall in love with him) but he struggles with the mental aspects of the game and i fear its purely lack of intelligence and compitency. There, you still havnt picked 1 hole in any of my arguments (as you don't have one) you still havnt demonstrated any football knowledge, you still havnt even come up with one coherent and relevant rebuttal to anything I've said about randle and it appears as though your argument is really running out of steam
The stats you particulary stated, do not tell one bit of the story of the year randle had EXCEPT he actually underproduced (which you wouldn't know if you didn't watch or didn't have a thorough idea of what you're watching) given the all the opps he had, he probably left about 300 yards unhad cause he can't catch a deep ball (the best part of our QBs game) and I won't go into what his other deficiencies cost us cause we both already know
Last edited by Mookskingdom; 04-30-2014 at 03:15 PM.