+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    997

    Spagnuolo pressure compared to current pressure

    Was listening to Colin Cowherd and he had Peter King on. King was discussing the 07' pressure that the defense brought against Tom Brady, compared to our current unit's pressure to the Quarterback. Suggesting that our current defense might be easier to handle. Because the lack of Spagnuolo's exotic blitz packages.


    Discuss?

  2. #2

    Re: Spagnuolo pressure compared to current pressure

    1 name.


    JPP.

  3. #3
    All-Pro slipknottin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    37,214

    Re: Spagnuolo pressure compared to current pressure

    fewell sends more big blitzes (6+ rushers) than Spags did

  4. #4
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    997

    Re: Spagnuolo pressure compared to current pressure

    [quote user="slipknottin"]fewell sends more big blitzes (6+ rushers) than Spags did[/quote]Not how many blitzes. But how they were designed, where the pressure is coming from etc...

  5. #5
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,230

    Re: Spagnuolo pressure compared to current pressure

    ha, blitzes? ... re-watch the Super Bowl ... it was pressure from the front 4 ... Tuck especially and Osi too !!!! ...it's amazing how people revise history to make their agenda !



    oh and Jay Alford !!!! ... what a win , what a game ...



    stay tuned !!!!!!!!

  6. #6
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    997

    Re: Spagnuolo pressure compared to current pressure

    [quote user="G-Man67"]ha, blitzes? ... re-watch the Super Bowl ... it was pressure from the front 4 ... Tuck especially and Osi too !!!! ...it's amazing how people revise history to make their agenda !



    oh and Jay Alford !!!! ... what a win , what a game ...





    stay tuned !!!!!!!![/quote]Yeah I agree. The front four won us that game. Dare I say it is better now than it was then.


  7. #7

    Re: Spagnuolo pressure compared to current pressure

    there were quite a few big plays in the game made by a guy from the secondary coming on a blitz. i dont think they ever got to Brady but they threw off his timing and the pass was always incomplete.

    the front 4 was the main reason we won, but in a game that close every play was important.

  8. #8

    Re: Spagnuolo pressure compared to current pressure

    [quote user="NYgiants141"]1 name.


    JPP.
    [/quote]
    Agreed
    Football has been very, very good to us.
    Even though 2013 was a losing season, we can console ourselves with this fact-

    # of Super Bowl victories since 1985:

    1-Chicago, St. Louis, Tampa Bay, Indianapolis, New Orleans, Seattle
    2-Washington, Green Bay, Denver, Pittsburgh, Baltimore
    3-San Francisco, Dallas, New England
    4-New York Giants!!!!!

    Let's make it 5 in 2014 !!!

    ***Stat provided by "Schloss22"***

  9. #9

    Re: Spagnuolo pressure compared to current pressure

    [quote user="NYgiants141"]1 name.


    JPP.
    [/quote]
    Agreed
    Football has been very, very good to us.
    Even though 2013 was a losing season, we can console ourselves with this fact-

    # of Super Bowl victories since 1985:

    1-Chicago, St. Louis, Tampa Bay, Indianapolis, New Orleans, Seattle
    2-Washington, Green Bay, Denver, Pittsburgh, Baltimore
    3-San Francisco, Dallas, New England
    4-New York Giants!!!!!

    Let's make it 5 in 2014 !!!

    ***Stat provided by "Schloss22"***

  10. #10

    Re: Spagnuolo pressure compared to current pressure

    2 words, Coverage Sacks... How sweet a couple two-tree of these would be...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts