Spagnuolo pressure compared to current pressure

[jjj45]

Was listening to Colin Cowherd and he had Peter King on. King was discussing the 07' pressure that the defense brought against Tom Brady, compared to our current unit's pressure to the Quarterback. Suggesting that our current defense might be easier to handle. Because the lack of Spagnuolo's exotic blitz packages.


Discuss?

[NYgiants141]

1 name.


JPP.

[slipknottin]

fewell sends more big blitzes (6+ rushers) than Spags did

[jjj45]

[quote user="slipknottin"]fewell sends more big blitzes (6+ rushers) than Spags did[/quote]Not how many blitzes. But how they were designed, where the pressure is coming from etc...

[G-Man67]

ha, blitzes? ... re-watch the Super Bowl ... it was pressure from the front 4 ... Tuck especially and Osi too !!!! ...it's amazing how people revise history to make their agenda !



oh and Jay Alford !!!! ... what a win , what a game ...



stay tuned !!!!!!!!

[jjj45]

[quote user="G-Man67"]ha, blitzes? ... re-watch the Super Bowl ... it was pressure from the front 4 ... Tuck especially and Osi too !!!! ...it's amazing how people revise history to make their agenda !



oh and Jay Alford !!!! ... what a win , what a game ...</p>



stay tuned !!!!!!!![/quote]Yeah I agree. The front four won us that game. Dare I say it is better now than it was then.
</p>

[TrueBlue07]

there were quite a few big plays in the game made by a guy from the secondary coming on a blitz. i dont think they ever got to Brady but they threw off his timing and the pass was always incomplete.

the front 4 was the main reason we won, but in a game that close every play was important.

[miked1958]

[quote user="NYgiants141"]1 name.


JPP.
[/quote]
Agreed

[miked1958]

[quote user="NYgiants141"]1 name.


JPP.
[/quote]
Agreed

[NYG4ME]

2 words, Coverage Sacks... How sweet a couple two-tree of these would be...