+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26
  1. #1

    Is Anyone Else Disappointed In The Giants Free Agency?

    Brandon Marshall is probably too old. Terrelle Pryor would have
    been better for one-year contract.
    Rhett Ellison might be a good blocker, but the Giants
    need a big play tight end.
    DJ Fluker was basically let go by the Chargers, so how
    much better is he than Marshall at OT?
    John Jerry at OG for 3 yrs?Really?Giants could
    not do better than him in free agency?
    Where is the upgrade at RB? Shane Vereen?
    So will Ereck Flowers be the left tackle when season begins?
    Hope not!

  2. #2
    No because i'm realistic and realize we have no cap space. Fans expecting a spending spree every year like last year need to wake up and realize there is a salary cap.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by free agent View Post
    Brandon Marshall is probably too old. Terrelle Pryor would have
    been better for one-year contract.
    Rhett Ellison might be a good blocker, but the Giants
    need a big play tight end.
    DJ Fluker was basically let go by the Chargers, so how
    much better is he than Marshall at OT?
    John Jerry at OG for 3 yrs?Really?Giants could
    not do better than him in free agency?
    Where is the upgrade at RB? Shane Vereen?
    So will Ereck Flowers be the left tackle when season begins?
    Hope not!
    Im good with Brandon Marshall. He is only one year away from a great season. I won't be too much stock into last season with the jets. They were just a mess. I don't like the Rhett guy. I dont understand how he got that much money as a blocker. Hopefully he can catch?? Free agency is not over. The Giants can still get Blount. Hey even if he gets a 1/3 of his TDs he had last year that's a huge improvement for the giants lol.
    2017 offensive plan
    1. cut jennings, cruz
    2. draft a atleast 1- RB, WR, TE in rounds 1-3
    3.draft oline-rounds 1-3

  4. #4
    Veteran BleedBlue15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    3,016
    Quote Originally Posted by B-Red22 View Post
    No because i'm realistic and realize we have no cap space. Fans expecting a spending spree every year like last year need to wake up and realize there is a salary cap.
    +1000

  5. #5
    the "he got release by another team so he must suck" argument is ridic. I mean yeah it obviously is true some of the time. But also some of the time it's not true. It goes both ways so saying it as an argument for either side is just dumb.

    idk if Fluker will be good or not, but based on his contract and the potential reward, on top of what every other OL got this FA, plus the Giants cap space. Fluker makes a ton of sense.

    Bmarsh is on a 1 year deal pretty much, if the Giants cut Bmarsh after this year they would save $5.5M, so it's essentially a 1 year deal for Bmarsh based on his perfromance. And his cap hit for this year is only $4.5M. Meanwhile Pryor's 1 year deal costs $6M this year. Pryor has 1 year as a good WR plus has beefed with one of our own CBs (Janoris Jenkins), while Marshall has a ton of experience in the league and has been dominant for most of his career. Bmarsh is also a very good run blocker. Bmarsh makes a ton of sense both for team chemistry and financially.

    Ellison is a good blocker like you said. But also you gotta realize 1, There's still the draft LOADED with big play TEs. and 2, that Reese has never valued TE high so he may actually ride out with Ellison as TE1 if the draft doesnt fall in favor of a TE for us. He may have faith in Adams and Ellison combined. Cant hate on the Ellison signing because he gives us a major thing the Giants lacked last year. a TE and a FB that can block.

    Jerry signed for 3 years but for $4.25M guaranteed. He can be cut pretty much at any time after this year and is no big deal. Plus he's depth if we dont find anyone better. It's always better to be safe than sorry, esp on a cheap deal like that. He can compete with Fluker and Jerry and possibly even a rookie for a starting spot this year, and if he doesnt win at least we have someone who started 41 games for us the last 3 years as depth that can come in if there was an injury.

    RB they can still upgrade via the draft, and i think it's highly likely they will. Giants already have Perkins who showed us something last year and Vereen who people forget had 59 catches and 760 total yards in 2015 and was a big part of this offense out of the back field as a receiving threat. They add a big power type back in the draft and the back field is set for a few years to come.

    Who would you of liked to replace Flowers? Would of of overpaid for a 36 year old? How about a 4yr $53M contract to someone whos only marginally better than Flowers but 7 years older than Flowers? As much as he sucked last year and he may potentially suck still this year, there's just simply no better options. Why not gamble on the 23 year old putting it all together in his 3rd year instead of overpaying for someone who costs a ton and would handcuff the rest of the teams moves?

    The Giants moves all made sense this offseason. Theyve added people in FA with limited cap money that can help the team improve this year. They didnt really lose anyone from the 11-5 team of last year and have only improved on the offense.

    The Giants may not of done what you wanted or what every fan wanted to do, but how the attacked FA and what they did made plenty of sense for how they were set up in the cap, how the market played, and the team structure.
    Last edited by gibril28wilson; 03-15-2017 at 09:17 PM.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by gibril28wilson View Post
    the "he got release by another team so he must suck" argument is ridic. I mean yeah it obviously is true some of the time. But also some of the time it's not true. It goes both ways so saying it as an argument for either side is just dumb.

    idk if Fluker will be good or not, but based on his contract and the potential reward, on top of what every other OL got this FA, plus the Giants cap space. Fluker makes a ton of sense.

    Bmarsh is on a 1 year deal pretty much, if the Giants cut Bmarsh after this year they would save $5.5M, so it's essentially a 1 year deal for Bmarsh based on his perfromance. And his cap hit for this year is only $4.5M. Meanwhile Pryor's 1 year deal costs $6M this year. Pryor has 1 year as a good WR plus has beefed with one of our own CBs (Janoris Jenkins), while Marshall has a ton of experience in the league and has been dominant for most of his career. Bmarsh is also a very good run blocker. Bmarsh makes a ton of sense both for team chemistry and financially.

    Ellison is a good blocker like you said. But also you gotta realize 1, There's still the draft LOADED with big play TEs. and 2, that Reese has never valued TE high so he may actually ride out with Ellison as TE1 if the draft doesnt fall in favor of a TE for us. He may have faith in Adams and Ellison combined. Cant hate on the Ellison signing because he gives us a major thing the Giants lacked last year. a TE and a FB that can block.

    Jerry signed for 3 years but for $4.25M guaranteed. He can be cut pretty much at any time after this year and is no big deal. Plus he's depth if we dont find anyone better. It's always better to be safe than sorry, esp on a cheap deal like that. He can compete with Fluker and Jerry and possibly even a rookie for a starting spot this year, and if he doesnt win at least we have someone who started 41 games for us the last 3 years as depth that can come in if there was an injury.

    RB they can still upgrade via the draft, and i think it's highly likely they will. Giants already have Perkins who showed us something last year and Vereen who people forget had 59 catches and 760 total yards in 2015 and was a big part of this offense out of the back field as a receiving threat. They add a big power type back in the draft and the back field is set for a few years to come.

    Who would you of liked to replace Flowers? Would of of overpaid for a 36 year old? How about a 4yr $53M contract to someone whos only marginally better than Flowers but 7 years older than Flowers? As much as he sucked last year and he may potentially suck still this year, there's just simply no better options. Why not gamble on the 23 year old putting it all together in his 3rd year instead of overpaying for someone who costs a ton and would handcuff the rest of the teams moves?

    The Giants moves all made sense this offseason. Theyve added people in FA with limited cap money that can help the team improve this year. They didnt really lose anyone from the 11-5 team of last year and have only improved on the offense.

    The Giants may not of done what you wanted or what every fan wanted to do, but how the attacked FA and what they did made plenty of sense for how they were set up in the cap, how the market played, and the team structure.
    Great Post.. Thank You
    Football has been very, very good to us.
    After losing seasons 2013-15, the giants put up 11 wins in 16.. they are on way Back
    But for now we can console ourselves with this fact-

    # of Super Bowl victories since 1985:

    1-Chicago, St. Louis, Tampa Bay, Indianapolis, New Orleans, Seattle
    2-Washington, Green Bay, Pittsburgh, Baltimore
    3-San Francisco, Dallas, Denver
    4-New York Giants!!!
    5-NE
    Let's make it 5 in 2016 so we can be on a LINE NE again!!!

    ***Stat provided by "Schloss22"***

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by gibril28wilson View Post
    the "he got release by another team so he must suck" argument is ridic. I mean yeah it obviously is true some of the time. But also some of the time it's not true. It goes both ways so saying it as an argument for either side is just dumb.

    idk if Fluker will be good or not, but based on his contract and the potential reward, on top of what every other OL got this FA, plus the Giants cap space. Fluker makes a ton of sense.

    Bmarsh is on a 1 year deal pretty much, if the Giants cut Bmarsh after this year they would save $5.5M, so it's essentially a 1 year deal for Bmarsh based on his perfromance. And his cap hit for this year is only $4.5M. Meanwhile Pryor's 1 year deal costs $6M this year. Pryor has 1 year as a good WR plus has beefed with one of our own CBs (Janoris Jenkins), while Marshall has a ton of experience in the league and has been dominant for most of his career. Bmarsh is also a very good run blocker. Bmarsh makes a ton of sense both for team chemistry and financially.

    Ellison is a good blocker like you said. But also you gotta realize 1, There's still the draft LOADED with big play TEs. and 2, that Reese has never valued TE high so he may actually ride out with Ellison as TE1 if the draft doesnt fall in favor of a TE for us. He may have faith in Adams and Ellison combined. Cant hate on the Ellison signing because he gives us a major thing the Giants lacked last year. a TE and a FB that can block.

    Jerry signed for 3 years but for $4.25M guaranteed. He can be cut pretty much at any time after this year and is no big deal. Plus he's depth if we dont find anyone better. It's always better to be safe than sorry, esp on a cheap deal like that. He can compete with Fluker and Jerry and possibly even a rookie for a starting spot this year, and if he doesnt win at least we have someone who started 41 games for us the last 3 years as depth that can come in if there was an injury.

    RB they can still upgrade via the draft, and i think it's highly likely they will. Giants already have Perkins who showed us something last year and Vereen who people forget had 59 catches and 760 total yards in 2015 and was a big part of this offense out of the back field as a receiving threat. They add a big power type back in the draft and the back field is set for a few years to come.

    Who would you of liked to replace Flowers? Would of of overpaid for a 36 year old? How about a 4yr $53M contract to someone whos only marginally better than Flowers but 7 years older than Flowers? As much as he sucked last year and he may potentially suck still this year, there's just simply no better options. Why not gamble on the 23 year old putting it all together in his 3rd year instead of overpaying for someone who costs a ton and would handcuff the rest of the teams moves?

    The Giants moves all made sense this offseason. Theyve added people in FA with limited cap money that can help the team improve this year. They didnt really lose anyone from the 11-5 team of last year and have only improved on the offense.

    The Giants may not of done what you wanted or what every fan wanted to do, but how the attacked FA and what they did made plenty of sense for how they were set up in the cap, how the market played, and the team structure.
    This is really well said nice post

  8. #8
    Brandon Marshall was a phenomenal pickup in every way. There is literally no downside to acquiring him.

    Pryor would've been better? I find it telling, he was the best weapon the Browns had and they didn't even resign him. With all that cap space they let him walk. Seems to be more glitter than gold.

    I couldn't be happier with this off-season. We didn't overspend on old, injure plagued offensive linemen, we grabbed the one player that would come in and have the biggest immediate impact, in Marshall, and we picked up an immediate asset in run blocking and pass protection, in Ellison. What's not to love?
    2017 FA Targets:

    Considering the draft, and the overall depth available at many positions of need for us, here's my "wish list" for FA.

    Resign:
    *JPP DE NYG*
    *Jonathan Hankins - DT - NYG*
    *Marshall Newhouse - OG/OT - NYG*
    *Robbie Gould - K - NYG*

    Targets:
    WR - Brandon Marshall, Kamar Aiken or Kendall Wright
    OG - Kevin Zeitler, Larry Warford
    OT - Kevin Beachum
    RB - Tim Hightower, Jamaal Charles

  9. #9
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Upstate NY near Lake Ontario
    Posts
    1,254
    Quote Originally Posted by gibril28wilson View Post
    the "he got release by another team so he must suck" argument is ridic. I mean yeah it obviously is true some of the time. But also some of the time it's not true. It goes both ways so saying it as an argument for either side is just dumb.

    idk if Fluker will be good or not, but based on his contract and the potential reward, on top of what every other OL got this FA, plus the Giants cap space. Fluker makes a ton of sense.

    Bmarsh is on a 1 year deal pretty much, if the Giants cut Bmarsh after this year they would save $5.5M, so it's essentially a 1 year deal for Bmarsh based on his perfromance. And his cap hit for this year is only $4.5M. Meanwhile Pryor's 1 year deal costs $6M this year. Pryor has 1 year as a good WR plus has beefed with one of our own CBs (Janoris Jenkins), while Marshall has a ton of experience in the league and has been dominant for most of his career. Bmarsh is also a very good run blocker. Bmarsh makes a ton of sense both for team chemistry and financially.

    Ellison is a good blocker like you said. But also you gotta realize 1, There's still the draft LOADED with big play TEs. and 2, that Reese has never valued TE high so he may actually ride out with Ellison as TE1 if the draft doesnt fall in favor of a TE for us. He may have faith in Adams and Ellison combined. Cant hate on the Ellison signing because he gives us a major thing the Giants lacked last year. a TE and a FB that can block.

    Jerry signed for 3 years but for $4.25M guaranteed. He can be cut pretty much at any time after this year and is no big deal. Plus he's depth if we dont find anyone better. It's always better to be safe than sorry, esp on a cheap deal like that. He can compete with Fluker and Jerry and possibly even a rookie for a starting spot this year, and if he doesnt win at least we have someone who started 41 games for us the last 3 years as depth that can come in if there was an injury.

    RB they can still upgrade via the draft, and i think it's highly likely they will. Giants already have Perkins who showed us something last year and Vereen who people forget had 59 catches and 760 total yards in 2015 and was a big part of this offense out of the back field as a receiving threat. They add a big power type back in the draft and the back field is set for a few years to come.

    Who would you of liked to replace Flowers? Would of of overpaid for a 36 year old? How about a 4yr $53M contract to someone whos only marginally better than Flowers but 7 years older than Flowers? As much as he sucked last year and he may potentially suck still this year, there's just simply no better options. Why not gamble on the 23 year old putting it all together in his 3rd year instead of overpaying for someone who costs a ton and would handcuff the rest of the teams moves?

    The Giants moves all made sense this offseason. Theyve added people in FA with limited cap money that can help the team improve this year. They didnt really lose anyone from the 11-5 team of last year and have only improved on the offense.

    The Giants may not of done what you wanted or what every fan wanted to do, but how the attacked FA and what they did made plenty of sense for how they were set up in the cap, how the market played, and the team structure.
    As the others said, damn good post.

  10. #10
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Upstate NY near Lake Ontario
    Posts
    1,254
    Reese is actually improving at this people management game. If Fluker will ever have a career year, it will be this year. He has the body and should have all the incentive in the world playing for what should be the biggest pay day of his life. B marshall is a tremendous fit for this team. Putting on the storied Blue IMO is going to bring him right back to the top of his game, and he should prove to be a great leader to the young WRs who perhaps took a playoff berth a little too lightly. I like what he's done considering the constraints and he may have a trick or two left.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts