+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31
  1. #21
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    2,824
    Quote Originally Posted by BronxBomberBlue View Post
    Why?? We have Richburg at Center.
    This is the question, it doesn't make sense. Richburg younger and cheaper. Is Mangold gonna sign for 2-3 years cheaper than Richburg will ask for next year on his contract. So they save money in the long run plus depth this year. Which one you going to sit unless one of them can play OT ? Or does one go to Guard and Fluker to Tackle ? This would be a head scratcher to me.

  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by That Guy Rich View Post
    This is the question, it doesn't make sense. Richburg younger and cheaper. Is Mangold gonna sign for 2-3 years cheaper than Richburg will ask for next year on his contract. So they save money in the long run plus depth this year. Which one you going to sit unless one of them can play OT ? Or does one go to Guard and Fluker to Tackle ? This would be a head scratcher to me.
    It says in there they'd only be interested in Manhood as a guard, though having a backup center to boot doesn't hurt, if it's a dirt cheap deal I don't see why this would be a head scratcher, I think it'd be a solid move, we said we wanted competitions in the oline in camp, here's a guy that actually stand a chance and at worse is damn good depth

  3. #23
    Going to have like 100 guards and no tackles.
    Football is a team game. Football is a team game. Football is a team game. Football is a team game. Football is a team game.

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Stoneroses6300 View Post
    Going to have like 100 guards and no tackles.
    What's the depth of our interior looking like? At G there's Pugh, Jerry, Fluker (who could bed up being a back up tackle) and at center there's Richburg and.. Jones?

  5. #25
    All-Pro TheAnalyst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Original Member since 04-04-04
    Posts
    25,464
    Mangold is a pretty good last name.

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAnalyst View Post
    Mangold is a pretty good last name.
    No scramble for us this time?

  7. #27
    Veteran BleedBlue15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    2,718
    Quote Originally Posted by That Guy Rich View Post
    This is the question, it doesn't make sense. Richburg younger and cheaper. Is Mangold gonna sign for 2-3 years cheaper than Richburg will ask for next year on his contract. So they save money in the long run plus depth this year. Which one you going to sit unless one of them can play OT ? Or does one go to Guard and Fluker to Tackle ? This would be a head scratcher to me.
    I actually brought up the idea of signing Mangold a few weeks ago when he was first released. However, I have not seen any reports from beat writers that the Giants are truly interested in Mangold. The linked article means nothing to me. BUT if they were interested, the idea would be for Mangold to play RG. He would not have any impact on Richburg at C. And I doubt it would be a 2-3 year deal. More than likely a 1 year deal. Depends on if Mangold is interested in continuing to play and if he's interested in playing G. It is not a bad idea. Would bring some veteran leadership to the OL.

    You'd have: Flowers - Pugh - Richburg - Mangold - Fluker
    John Jerry, Brett Jones and a draft pick as depth. That draft pick (depending on where taken) can also battle for a starting spot with Fluker at RT and even Flowers at LT

  8. #28
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    2,824
    Quote Originally Posted by Eliordie View Post
    It says in there they'd only be interested in Manhood as a guard, though having a backup center to boot doesn't hurt, if it's a dirt cheap deal I don't see why this would be a head scratcher, I think it'd be a solid move, we said we wanted competitions in the oline in camp, here's a guy that actually stand a chance and at worse is damn good depth
    Quote Originally Posted by BleedBlue15 View Post
    I actually brought up the idea of signing Mangold a few weeks ago when he was first released. However, I have not seen any reports from beat writers that the Giants are truly interested in Mangold. The linked article means nothing to me. BUT if they were interested, the idea would be for Mangold to play RG. He would not have any impact on Richburg at C. And I doubt it would be a 2-3 year deal. More than likely a 1 year deal. Depends on if Mangold is interested in continuing to play and if he's interested in playing G. It is not a bad idea. Would bring some veteran leadership to the OL.

    You'd have: Flowers - Pugh - Richburg - Mangold - Fluker
    John Jerry, Brett Jones and a draft pick as depth. That draft pick (depending on where taken) can also battle for a starting spot with Fluker at RT and even Flowers at LT
    I think you guys have changed my mind it would make the line more solid. It would give us a lot of flexibility as well. I see your thinking moving Fluker to RT over Pugh. But it would give us options. But it kind of looks like last years blueprint of a Center and 4 Guards. Are you cutting Hart ? Though I think the group with Mangold is an improvement on last year.

  9. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by That Guy Rich View Post
    I think you guys have changed my mind it would make the line more solid. It would give us a lot of flexibility as well. I see your thinking moving Fluker to RT over Pugh. But it would give us options. But it kind of looks like last years blueprint of a Center and 4 Guards. Are you cutting Hart ? Though I think the group with Mangold is an improvement on last year.
    Pretty sure we usually carry 4 guards and 2 centers no? Honestly Mangold may be a guy who can save us a roster spot by being the primary back up at C and then throw him in a competition for guard, if he loses hes 2nd string (probably left) guard and center, if he wins a spot and say Richburg goes down he slides over to center and Jerry or Fluker come in his spot

  10. #30
    Veteran BleedBlue15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    2,718
    Quote Originally Posted by That Guy Rich View Post
    Are you cutting Hart?
    Ha no I wasn't cutting Hart. I just forgot about him. He's in the mix as well. Competition is a good thing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts