+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 43
  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by GameTime View Post
    why...
    what was wrong with what he said.?
    He didnt mention JJ but said signing Pugh is a must.

    Is that what you are annoyed at
    BINGO LOL

  2. #22
    All-Pro Gee718's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Planet Naboo
    Posts
    11,579
    I don't disagree with his cons.....But time shall tell

  3. #23
    All-Pro TheAnalyst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Goonies never say die
    Posts
    26,468
    What went wrong

    They failed to address a dismal offensive line. For the second season in a row, the Giants' offense was rendered irrelevant at times by a porous offensive line. Inexplicably, for the second year in a row, Reese did close to nothing to address the issue. New York lost another regular in Marshall Newhouse, and the reinforcements Reese brought in are underwhelming. Free-agent signee D.J. Fluker failed at tackle before settling in as a mediocre guard in San Diego, and the first and only draft selection Reese used on a lineman was a sixth-round pick on Adam Bisnowaty. After a season in which the Giants ranked 26th in rushing DVOA and averaged just 3.5 yards per rush attempt, you would think Reese would have put more of an emphasis on re-signing offensive linemen.
    I feel the same way. Dont you? Lets hope Bisnowaty, Wheeler or Dunker comes through.

    Also, the part about Pugh and Richburg about to get paid. Its true. We wont keep both. Pugh will cost $10m per, overpaid, but better than if Richburg gets $7m per.
    Spin that Webb young Davis

  4. #24
    Moderator RoanokeFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    120,457
    Quote Originally Posted by CRF11504 View Post
    "It was surprising, though, to see the Giants nominally replace Hankins by drafting Alabama nose tackle Dalvin Tomlinson in the second round. He profiles, essentially, as Harrison: a two-down, interior run-stopper who is limited as a pass-rusher. Having one of those guys is good. But two? Not so much."


    LOL....how can you not laugh at this lunacy?
    It's an opinion . No more and no less.
    “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1




  5. #25
    Veteran TEM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    2,427
    What went wrong

    They failed to address a dismal offensive line. For the second season in a row, the Giants' offense was rendered irrelevant at times by a porous offensive line. Inexplicably, for the second year in a row, Reese did close to nothing to address the issue. New York lost another regular in Marshall Newhouse, and the reinforcements Reese brought in are underwhelming. Free-agent signee D.J. Fluker failed at tackle before settling in as a mediocre guard in San Diego, and the first and only draft selection Reese used on a lineman was a sixth-round pick on Adam Bisnowaty. After a season in which the Giants ranked 26th in rushing DVOA and averaged just 3.5 yards per rush attempt, you would think Reese would have put more of an emphasis on re-signing offensive linemen.
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAnalyst View Post
    I feel the same way. Dont you? Lets hope Bisnowaty, Wheeler or Dunker comes through.

    Also, the part about Pugh and Richburg about to get paid. Its true. We wont keep both. Pugh will cost $10m per, overpaid, but better than if Richburg gets $7m per.
    Exactly Fluker has a lot to prove . He may be the have the same pass protection issues he had in SD. He is a big IF. That is not what you want from a projected starting RG or RT.
    Last edited by TEM; 05-17-2017 at 07:33 PM.

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAnalyst View Post
    I feel the same way. Dont you? Lets hope Bisnowaty, Wheeler or Dunker comes through.

    Also, the part about Pugh and Richburg about to get paid. Its true. We wont keep both. Pugh will cost $10m per, overpaid, but better than if Richburg gets $7m per.


    what are you talking about dude? How is Pugh getting 10 better than Richburg getting 7?

    Pugh will get $0 from the Giants beyond 2017. ZERO.
    Last edited by CRF11504; 05-18-2017 at 11:04 AM.

  7. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by TEM View Post
    Exactly Fluker has a lot to prove . He may be the have the same pass protection issues he had in SD. He is a big IF. That is not what you want from a projected starting RG or RT.

    His protection issues came at RG, not at RT

    Fluker grades

    2013 at RT = 71.4
    2014 at RT = 77.0

    2015 at RG = 57.5
    2016 at RG = 63.7


    Fluker = above average Right Tackle

  8. #28
    That depends, Mrs. Jerry. Do you by any chance work at ESPN?

  9. #29
    All-Pro Eli TO Shockey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    7,044
    I agree. What a doof.

  10. #30
    ESPN as a whole is full of morons

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts