[quote user="CDN_G-FAN"][quote user="NYG6timeworldchamps"]
They are calling the Giants "SO-CALLED" Champs?
The link below:
There stating that cause the G-Men play in a tougher conference and they play in a better conference the G-Men "stink." Huh?
This one makes me angry as well:
"Difference between 2001 Pats and these two "Championship" Giants teams is that the Pats went on afterwards to prove their domination wasn't a fluke. Greenbay did this last year. The Saints continued to dominate after their turn around as well. The Giants don't do this. They slip back into mediocrity, with no real leadership and reinforce the idea that they really were just lucky."
this thread made me sign up for their boards.
i find it interesting that the historical smear Pats fans used against the Colts is that they could rack up all the fantastic regular season records they wanted, what mattered was championships.
Guess championships don't matter that much when you're not winning them anymore.
To their credit, there's been a few other threads on there that are much more mature than what you'll find on the 49ers board.
There's one talking about Jacobs Geisele comments, and about half of the responses in that thread fall into the "well, if we don't like all the trash talk, we should try beating them in championship games" category.
That's pretty mature for a fanbase that's lost twice to us.[/quote]
The last post in the thread talks about how the Giants slip into Mediocrity after winning the super bowl
Can you point out to them that in 2008, the Giants went 12-4 and Won the division, then lost in the first round, just like the Packers?
I'd appreciate it if you spread some knowledge there, but I don't feel like registering myself