+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    16,089

    talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11



    said that was huge in why GB won. Said it is the rule and u have to call it but it didnt disrupt the route and there was on after that way worse that was not called. Also they are all saying the the jennings td was not a td.




    on the otherside of it they said the the late hit on eli by woodson should have not been called.

    Football has been very, very good to us.
    In the midst of this losing season, we can console ourselves with this fact-

    # of Super Bowl victories since 1985:

    1-Chicago, St. Louis, Tampa Bay, Indianapolis, New Orleans, Seattle
    2-Washington, Green Bay, Denver, Pittsburgh, Baltimore
    3-San Francisco, Dallas, New England
    4-New York Giants!!!!!

    ***Stat provided by "Schloss22"***

  2. #2
    All-Pro ny06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    13,808

    Re: talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11

    [quote user="miked1958"]


    said that was huge in why GB won. Said it is the rule and u have to call it but it didnt disrupt the route and there was on after that way worse that was not called. Also they are all saying the the jennings td was not a td.




    on the otherside of it they said the the late hit on eli by woodson should have not been called.




    [/quote]




    That was an easy call, Woodson hit Eli in the area of his head with his forearm.




    That will be called every time...


    Giants fan since the early 80s

  3. #3

    Re: talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11

    What are you saying?

  4. #4

    Re: talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11

    People need to stop blaming the refs. Our Dbs were VERY physical down the field all game. We could have been called for a lot more than we were.

    Take Drivers corner endzone TD catch, Cweb gave him a good thump trying to push him out of bounds, the ref could have easily called that as it was textbook illegal contact.

  5. #5

    Re: talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11

    Agree, but there were a lot of questionable calls. Another I thought could have been called was the play on Nicks in the endz one where he had the ball until Peprah hit him and knocked it out. Looked like Peprah led with his helmet to Nicks's face mask. Suprised that one wasn'tcalled.

  6. #6
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    9,071

    Re: talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11



    [quote user="BlueSanta"]People need to stop blaming the refs. Our Dbs were VERY physical down the field all game. We could have been called for a lot more than we were.

    Take Drivers corner endzone TD catch, Cweb gave him a good thump trying to push him out of bounds, the ref could have easily called that as it was textbook illegal contact.
    [/quote]




    But, they let those players play, unlike Williams where they threw the flag. Very inconsistant, That call was horrible. Just let them play.


  7. #7

    Re: talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11

    [quote user="ny06"][quote user="miked1958"]


    said that was huge in why GB won. Said it is the rule and u have to call it but it didnt disrupt the route and there was on after that way worse that was not called. Also they are all saying the the jennings td was not a td.




    on the otherside of it they said the the late hit on eli by woodson should have not been called.




    [/quote]




    That was an easy call, Woodson hit Eli in the area of his head with his forearm.




    That will be called every time...

    [/quote]

    Nah. He hit him in the chest with his forearm. Poor call.
    My 5 year old son right before the kickoff of the Super Bowl 46: Dad, are the Giants gonna win?

    Burier: Yes.

    My 5 year old son right before the kickoff of Super Bowl 46: Do you promise?

    Burier: Yes. I promise.

  8. #8
    All-Pro GameTime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    No mans land
    Posts
    22,606

    Re: talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11

    [quote user="TuckYou"]


    [quote user="BlueSanta"]People need to stop blaming the refs. Our Dbs were VERY physical down the field all game. We could have been called for a lot more than we were.

    Take Drivers corner endzone TD catch, Cweb gave him a good thump trying to push him out of bounds, the ref could have easily called that as it was textbook illegal contact.
    [/quote]




    But, they let those players play, unlike Williams where they threw the flag. Very inconsistant, That call was horrible. Just let them play.




    [/quote] I agree.....let them play...




    the call on JW was a bad call but they wound up punting anyway.....

    "Measure Twice......Cut Once"
    You couldn't be more full of **** if you were break dancing in a Port-a-Potty.......Kruunch

  9. #9

    Re: talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11

    [quote user="burier"][quote user="ny06"][quote user="miked1958"]


    said that was huge in why GB won. Said it is the rule and u have to call it but it didnt disrupt the route and there was on after that way worse that was not called. Also they are all saying the the jennings td was not a td.




    on the otherside of it they said the the late hit on eli by woodson should have not been called.




    [/quote]





    That was an easy call, Woodson hit Eli in the area of his head with his forearm.




    That will be called every time...

    [/quote]


    Nah. He hit him in the chest with his forearm. Poor call.[/quote]


    Ummmm....you do realize that most, if not all, NFL players have 2 arms, right? Because one of his arms clearly grazed Elis helmet.

    Now don't get me wrong, the rule is garbage and that really shouldn't be called......however the rules what it is and its cost us in the past so ill gladly take the 15.

    Again though, his head was clearly hit if you re-watch.

  10. #10
    Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,539

    Re: talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11

    [quote user="Manning2Niks"][quote user="burier"][quote user="ny06"][quote user="miked1958"]


    said that was huge in why GB won. Said it is the rule and u have to call it but it didnt disrupt the route and there was on after that way worse that was not called. Also they are all saying the the jennings td was not a td.




    on the otherside of it they said the the late hit on eli by woodson should have not been called.




    [/quote]





    That was an easy call, Woodson hit Eli in the area of his head with his forearm.




    That will be called every time...

    [/quote]


    Nah. He hit him in the chest with his forearm. Poor call.[/quote]


    Ummmm....you do realize that most, if not all, NFL players have 2 arms, right? Because one of his arms clearly grazed Elis helmet.

    Now don't get me wrong, the rule is garbage and that really shouldn't be called......however the rules what it is and its cost us in the past so ill gladly take the 15.

    Again though, his head was clearly hit if you re-watch.[/quote]

    Yes, agreed, contact was made. Argue with the rulebook not with the ref.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts